Standard dose could be better! A multicenter study of tigecycline in patients with liver failure.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jinlin Guo, Xinfeng Cai, Shan Wang, Hongping Wen, Jing Ren, Mi Zhou, Xingang Li, Xiaodan Yan, Shuangshuang Tian, Fang Zhang, Yanqin Liu, Wenjun Zhang, Yunyun Shao, Jianghong Cao, Xiaochun Liu, Kaixuan Hou, Dan Wei, Guan Lin
{"title":"Standard dose could be better! A multicenter study of tigecycline in patients with liver failure.","authors":"Jinlin Guo, Xinfeng Cai, Shan Wang, Hongping Wen, Jing Ren, Mi Zhou, Xingang Li, Xiaodan Yan, Shuangshuang Tian, Fang Zhang, Yanqin Liu, Wenjun Zhang, Yunyun Shao, Jianghong Cao, Xiaochun Liu, Kaixuan Hou, Dan Wei, Guan Lin","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2025.2472346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-dose (HD) tigecycline is often required for severe multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in liver failure patients, despite package recommendations to halve the dose for those with severe liver impairment. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of different tigecycline doses in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 192 patients with Child-Pugh grade C liver failure was divided into label-dose (LD), standard-dose (SD), and HD groups. Primary and secondary outcomes included microbial eradication, mortality, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SD group achieved higher microbial eradication than LD, with comparable efficacy to HD but fewer adverse events, such as fibrinogen requirements. High-dose treatment increased mortality risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.85, <i>p</i> = 0.062). Optimal microbial eradication and minimized adverse effects occurred with the SD group at 7 days of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standard-dose tigecycline offers a balanced approach to microbial eradication and safety, making it preferable in liver failure patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2025.2472346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-dose (HD) tigecycline is often required for severe multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections in liver failure patients, despite package recommendations to halve the dose for those with severe liver impairment. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of different tigecycline doses in this population.

Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort of 192 patients with Child-Pugh grade C liver failure was divided into label-dose (LD), standard-dose (SD), and HD groups. Primary and secondary outcomes included microbial eradication, mortality, and adverse effects.

Results: The SD group achieved higher microbial eradication than LD, with comparable efficacy to HD but fewer adverse events, such as fibrinogen requirements. High-dose treatment increased mortality risk (Hazard Ratio: 1.85, p = 0.062). Optimal microbial eradication and minimized adverse effects occurred with the SD group at 7 days of treatment.

Conclusions: Standard-dose tigecycline offers a balanced approach to microbial eradication and safety, making it preferable in liver failure patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信