Effectiveness of Analgesics in Dental Whitening Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2025.2472021
Gabriella Alves Julião Costa, Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano, Ravy Jucá Farias, Diana Araújo Cunha, Dayrine Silveira de Paula, Edson Luiz Cetira Filho, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva
{"title":"Effectiveness of Analgesics in Dental Whitening Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Gabriella Alves Julião Costa, Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano, Ravy Jucá Farias, Diana Araújo Cunha, Dayrine Silveira de Paula, Edson Luiz Cetira Filho, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2472021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents on managing pain and sensitivity related to dental bleaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42024528788) searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, EBSCOhost, LIVIVO, Embase, and Grey literature (Google Scholar) up to March 2024. From 3,185 articles screened, 16 placebo-controlled RCTs involving 823 patients were included. NSAIDs were the most commonly used drugs, with some studies incorporating corticosteroids. Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using Rob-2, and a meta-analysis evaluated mean differences and relative risks across subgroups. GRADE-pro assessed evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed no significant improvement in pain or sensitivity scores (VAS: <i>p</i> = 0.770; NRS: <i>p</i> = 0.980) or tooth sensitivity incidence (<i>p</i> = 0.750) compared to placebo. However, 1 hour post-bleaching, the intervention group showed a slight VAS score reduction (mean difference: -0.49, CI95% = -0.83 to -0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Whitening results (ΔE: <i>p</i> = 0.140) and NSGU perception showed no differences, but the VITA scale slightly favored the placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.030). Ibuprofen or paracetamol-plus-codeine were the only that showed any clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anti-inflammatory or analgesic agents provided minimal benefit for controlling post-bleaching pain/sensitivity reducing 0.49-VAS-scores (clinically insignificant). There is a need to optimize pain management in dental bleaching, especially focusing on COX-2 selective NSAIDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"639-652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2472021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the impact of anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents on managing pain and sensitivity related to dental bleaching.

Methods: A PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42024528788) searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, EBSCOhost, LIVIVO, Embase, and Grey literature (Google Scholar) up to March 2024. From 3,185 articles screened, 16 placebo-controlled RCTs involving 823 patients were included. NSAIDs were the most commonly used drugs, with some studies incorporating corticosteroids. Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using Rob-2, and a meta-analysis evaluated mean differences and relative risks across subgroups. GRADE-pro assessed evidence certainty.

Results: Findings revealed no significant improvement in pain or sensitivity scores (VAS: p = 0.770; NRS: p = 0.980) or tooth sensitivity incidence (p = 0.750) compared to placebo. However, 1 hour post-bleaching, the intervention group showed a slight VAS score reduction (mean difference: -0.49, CI95% = -0.83 to -0.16; p = 0.004). Whitening results (ΔE: p = 0.140) and NSGU perception showed no differences, but the VITA scale slightly favored the placebo (p = 0.030). Ibuprofen or paracetamol-plus-codeine were the only that showed any clinical benefit.

Conclusions: Anti-inflammatory or analgesic agents provided minimal benefit for controlling post-bleaching pain/sensitivity reducing 0.49-VAS-scores (clinically insignificant). There is a need to optimize pain management in dental bleaching, especially focusing on COX-2 selective NSAIDs.

镇痛药在牙齿美白疼痛管理中的有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:本研究评估抗炎和镇痛药物对处理牙齿漂白相关疼痛和敏感性的影响。方法:一项在prospero注册的系统评价(CRD42024528788),检索截止到2024年3月PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、EBSCOhost、LIVIVO、Embase和Grey文献(谷歌Scholar)。从筛选的3185篇文章中,纳入了16项安慰剂对照rct,涉及823名患者。非甾体抗炎药是最常用的药物,一些研究还结合了皮质类固醇。使用rob2评估偏倚风险(RoB),并进行荟萃分析评估亚组间的平均差异和相对风险。GRADE-pro评估的证据确定性。结果:研究结果显示疼痛或敏感性评分无显著改善(VAS: p = 0.770;NRS: p = 0.980)或牙齿敏感发生率(p = 0.750)。然而,漂白后1小时,干预组VAS评分略有下降(平均差异:-0.49,CI95% = -0.83 ~ -0.16;p = 0.004)。美白结果(ΔE: p = 0.140)和NSGU感知没有差异,但VITA量表略偏向安慰剂(p = 0.030)。布洛芬或扑热息痛加可待因是唯一显示出任何临床疗效的药物。结论:抗炎或镇痛药物对控制漂白后疼痛/敏感性的作用微乎其微,降低0.49 vas评分(临床不显著)。在牙齿漂白中需要优化疼痛管理,特别是针对COX-2选择性非甾体抗炎药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信