Jeremy C Heard, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Yoni Dulitzki, Dylan Resnick, Jeffrey Zucker, Alexander Shaer, Jose A Canseco, Jeffrey A Rihn, Barrett Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Evaluating the Association Between Physical Therapy Variables and Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"Jeremy C Heard, Teeto Ezeonu, Yunsoo Lee, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Kellish, Yoni Dulitzki, Dylan Resnick, Jeffrey Zucker, Alexander Shaer, Jose A Canseco, Jeffrey A Rihn, Barrett Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate how inpatient physical therapy variables impact (1) inpatient complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, (3) 1-year reoperation rates, and (4) length of stay after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Previous studies have emphasized the role of early ambulation in postoperative spine patients as an effective method for improving pain and decreasing length of stay, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of inpatient physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Physical therapy data, including time to first inpatient PT session, gait trial distance achieved, post-treatment pain rating, and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC]) scores were collected using manual chart review. Surgical outcome variables included length of stay, inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations within 1 year of primary surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 425 patients were identified. There was no difference in hours to PT or total gait trial distance achieved between patients who experienced a complication and those that did not. Patients in the noncomplication group had higher AM-PAC scores than patients in the complication group. There was no difference with regards to time to PT, AM-PAC score, or gait trial distance achieved between readmitted patients and nonreadmitted patients or revision patients and nonrevision patients. Stepwise logistic regression showed that having a physical therapy session within 6 hours of surgery was predictive of a decreased length of stay both in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While inpatient physical therapy within 6 hours of surgery does not appear to impact readmissions, complications, or reoperations, surgeons should encourage early ambulation postoperatively to decrease extended hospital stays. Future investigation should seek to identify factors that delay inpatient PT in the 6 hours after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":"38 2","pages":"E129-E134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate how inpatient physical therapy variables impact (1) inpatient complications, (2) 90-day readmissions, (3) 1-year reoperation rates, and (4) length of stay after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion.
Summary of background data: Previous studies have emphasized the role of early ambulation in postoperative spine patients as an effective method for improving pain and decreasing length of stay, but few studies have evaluated the efficacy of inpatient physical therapy.
Methods: Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion from 2019 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Physical therapy data, including time to first inpatient PT session, gait trial distance achieved, post-treatment pain rating, and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care [AM-PAC]) scores were collected using manual chart review. Surgical outcome variables included length of stay, inpatient complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations within 1 year of primary surgery.
Results: Overall, 425 patients were identified. There was no difference in hours to PT or total gait trial distance achieved between patients who experienced a complication and those that did not. Patients in the noncomplication group had higher AM-PAC scores than patients in the complication group. There was no difference with regards to time to PT, AM-PAC score, or gait trial distance achieved between readmitted patients and nonreadmitted patients or revision patients and nonrevision patients. Stepwise logistic regression showed that having a physical therapy session within 6 hours of surgery was predictive of a decreased length of stay both in all patients.
Conclusions: While inpatient physical therapy within 6 hours of surgery does not appear to impact readmissions, complications, or reoperations, surgeons should encourage early ambulation postoperatively to decrease extended hospital stays. Future investigation should seek to identify factors that delay inpatient PT in the 6 hours after surgery.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.