Understanding factors that influence the drug choice of prescribers: A Q-methodology study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mariëlle G Hartjes, Annelot E F Elsevier, Jan Willem Grijpma, Milan C Richir, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar
{"title":"Understanding factors that influence the drug choice of prescribers: A Q-methodology study.","authors":"Mariëlle G Hartjes, Annelot E F Elsevier, Jan Willem Grijpma, Milan C Richir, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic decision-making often involves weighing several treatment options on the basis of, among other things, the disease profile, patient characteristics but also prescriber-specific factors. This study investigated the factors influencing therapeutic decision-making among prescribers and explores how these factors differ between healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Q-methodology study involved 37 participants from different medical backgrounds, including physicians, dentists, midwives, physician assistants and advanced nurse practitioners from various intra- and extramural settings in the Netherlands. Participants ranked 55 factors on their importance for medication prescribing, and factor analysis was used to identify distinct prescriber profiles. These profiles were subsequently enriched using qualitative data derived from post-sorting interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four prescriber profiles were identified that explained 59% of the study variance: pragmatic contextual, guideline oriented, experience driven and vulnerability focused. Several factors were ranked differently in each profile. The pragmatic contextual profile emphasized patient context and risk prevention, the guideline-oriented profile adhered to clinical guidelines, the experience-driven profile relied on clinical experience and patient-centred communication, and the vulnerability-focused profile prioritized personalized care for specific patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study sheds light on the diverse factors influencing prescriber decision-making in medical practice. By identifying four prescriber profiles, it reveals the complexity and diversity in how prescribers balance guidelines, clinical experience and patient-specific considerations in their practice. These findings offer direction for developing educational and policy initiatives to enhance the quality of prescribing, ultimately improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Therapeutic decision-making often involves weighing several treatment options on the basis of, among other things, the disease profile, patient characteristics but also prescriber-specific factors. This study investigated the factors influencing therapeutic decision-making among prescribers and explores how these factors differ between healthcare professionals.

Methods: This Q-methodology study involved 37 participants from different medical backgrounds, including physicians, dentists, midwives, physician assistants and advanced nurse practitioners from various intra- and extramural settings in the Netherlands. Participants ranked 55 factors on their importance for medication prescribing, and factor analysis was used to identify distinct prescriber profiles. These profiles were subsequently enriched using qualitative data derived from post-sorting interviews.

Results: Four prescriber profiles were identified that explained 59% of the study variance: pragmatic contextual, guideline oriented, experience driven and vulnerability focused. Several factors were ranked differently in each profile. The pragmatic contextual profile emphasized patient context and risk prevention, the guideline-oriented profile adhered to clinical guidelines, the experience-driven profile relied on clinical experience and patient-centred communication, and the vulnerability-focused profile prioritized personalized care for specific patient groups.

Conclusion: This study sheds light on the diverse factors influencing prescriber decision-making in medical practice. By identifying four prescriber profiles, it reveals the complexity and diversity in how prescribers balance guidelines, clinical experience and patient-specific considerations in their practice. These findings offer direction for developing educational and policy initiatives to enhance the quality of prescribing, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信