Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.
{"title":"Effect of opioid sparing strategies on postoperative pain and perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Lei Wang, Xinhua Hong, Yiting Xue, Zhen Su","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>SBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPV<sub>SBP,</sub> CV<sub>DBP</sub>, and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPV<sub>SBP</sub>, BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, BPV<sub>MAP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>MAP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub>, ARV<sub>DBP</sub> and ARV<sub>MAP</sub> were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPV<sub>DBP</sub>, CV<sub>DBP</sub>, ARV<sub>SBP</sub> and ARV<sub>DBP</sub> were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02953-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Opioid-sparing anesthesia(OSA) or opioid-free anesthesia(OFA) strategy can reduce postoperative pain, but the effect of different stratigies on postoperative pain for patients with high pain sensitivity remains unclear, and the effect of different stratigies on perioperative haemodynamic fluctuations remains controversial for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: A total of 173 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into three groups: opioid-free anesthesia group(Group OFA), opioid-sparing anesthesia group(Group OSA) or opioid-based anesthesia group (Group OBA). The preoperative assessment of patients' pain sensitivity was conducted using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) and Heart Rate (HR) were recorded at baseline(T0), after admission (T1), after induction(T2), 1 min after tracheal intubation (T3), 1 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and calculated as the variability of blood pressure (BPV), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV). Time to awake, acute pain, rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to first exhaust were also recorded.
Results: Compared with Group OBA, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group OFA and OSA at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVSBP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in both Group OSA and OBA compared to the Group OFA (P < 0.05). Group OSA exhibited lower BPVSBP, CVDBP, and ARVDBP compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). In the subgroup analysis of patients with high pain sensitivity, BPVSBP, BPVDBP, BPVMAP, CVDBP, CVMAP, ARVSBP, ARVDBP and ARVMAP were lower in Group OSA compared to Group OFA (P < 0.05). BPVDBP, CVDBP, ARVSBP and ARVDBP were lower in the OSA group compared to the OBA group (P < 0.05). The time to first exhaust was significantly reduced in patients in Group OFA compared with Group OSA and OBA (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: OSA can effectively control patients' postoperative pain with lower perioperative haemodynamic variability. It also has lower perioperative haemodynamic variability and acute pain in patients with high pain sensitivity, making it suitable for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial registration: The trial is registered with the China Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ChiCTR2400093036. Retrospectively registered (date of registration: 27/11/2024).
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.