α1-Adrenoceptor Blockade by Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Guinea Pig Thoracic Aorta as Revealed by Mechanical and Fluorescence Displacement Analysis.
{"title":"α<sub>1</sub>-Adrenoceptor Blockade by Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Guinea Pig Thoracic Aorta as Revealed by Mechanical and Fluorescence Displacement Analysis.","authors":"Iyuki Namekata, Maika Seki, Hiro Igarashi, Kohei Tsukada, Ayaka Kawazoe, Kuniaki Shirai, Marina Miyahara, Shogo Hamaguchi, Hikaru Tanaka","doi":"10.1248/bpb.b24-00797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of thirteen Vaughn Williams class I antiarrhythmic drugs on the α<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic receptor-mediated contraction were examined in thoracic aorta tissue preparations isolated from the guinea pig. Cibenzoline, quinidine, aprindine, and ranolazine, as well as prazosin, inhibited the phenylephrine-induced contraction with pA<sub>2</sub> values of 5.64, 5.59, 5.61, 5.08, and 8.50, respectively, but not prostaglandin F<sub>2α</sub>-induced. These drugs reduced the staining of the smooth muscle layer by fluorescent prazosin. Propafenone inhibited the phenylephrine-induced contraction with an apparent pA<sub>2</sub> value of 5.31 and reduced the staining by fluorescent prazosin, but also inhibited the prostaglandin F<sub>2α</sub>-induced contraction. Other class I antiarrhythmic drugs, disopyramide, pirmenol, procainamide, lidocaine, mexiletine, flecainide, pilsicainide, and GS-458967, affected neither the contraction by phenylephrine nor the fluorescent staining by prazosin. These results indicate that among the class I antiarrhythmic drugs, cibenzoline, aprindine, and propafenone, as well as quinidine and ranolazine, have α<sub>1</sub>-adrenoceptor-blocking activity at therapeutically relevant concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8955,"journal":{"name":"Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"48 2","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b24-00797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effects of thirteen Vaughn Williams class I antiarrhythmic drugs on the α1-adrenergic receptor-mediated contraction were examined in thoracic aorta tissue preparations isolated from the guinea pig. Cibenzoline, quinidine, aprindine, and ranolazine, as well as prazosin, inhibited the phenylephrine-induced contraction with pA2 values of 5.64, 5.59, 5.61, 5.08, and 8.50, respectively, but not prostaglandin F2α-induced. These drugs reduced the staining of the smooth muscle layer by fluorescent prazosin. Propafenone inhibited the phenylephrine-induced contraction with an apparent pA2 value of 5.31 and reduced the staining by fluorescent prazosin, but also inhibited the prostaglandin F2α-induced contraction. Other class I antiarrhythmic drugs, disopyramide, pirmenol, procainamide, lidocaine, mexiletine, flecainide, pilsicainide, and GS-458967, affected neither the contraction by phenylephrine nor the fluorescent staining by prazosin. These results indicate that among the class I antiarrhythmic drugs, cibenzoline, aprindine, and propafenone, as well as quinidine and ranolazine, have α1-adrenoceptor-blocking activity at therapeutically relevant concentrations.
期刊介绍:
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Biol. Pharm. Bull.) began publication in 1978 as the Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics. It covers various biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences. A fourth Society journal, the Journal of Health Science, was merged with Biol. Pharm. Bull. in 2012.
The main aim of the Society’s journals is to advance the pharmaceutical sciences with research reports, information exchange, and high-quality discussion. The average review time for articles submitted to the journals is around one month for first decision. The complete texts of all of the Society’s journals can be freely accessed through J-STAGE. The Society’s editorial committee hopes that the content of its journals will be useful to your research, and also invites you to submit your own work to the journals.