Effect of Laparoscopic versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy on Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients with Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Chen Liu, He Cheng, Min Wang, Yunqiang Cai, Chongyi Jiang, Liang Tang, Guopei Luo, Kaizhou Jin, Shunrong Ji, Wenyan Xu, Si Shi, Xu Wang, Meng Liu, Weihong Zhao, Xiaowu Xu, Jin Xu, Weiding Wu, Wei Wang, Jianhua Liu, Chenghao Shao, Bing Peng, Renyi Qin, Xianjun Yu
{"title":"Effect of Laparoscopic versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy on Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients with Left-sided Pancreatic Cancer: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Chen Liu, He Cheng, Min Wang, Yunqiang Cai, Chongyi Jiang, Liang Tang, Guopei Luo, Kaizhou Jin, Shunrong Ji, Wenyan Xu, Si Shi, Xu Wang, Meng Liu, Weihong Zhao, Xiaowu Xu, Jin Xu, Weiding Wu, Wei Wang, Jianhua Liu, Chenghao Shao, Bing Peng, Renyi Qin, Xianjun Yu","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this trial was to evaluate the oncological superiority of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The oncological efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer patients. Candidates were recruited from six centers in China, and randomly assigned to receive either LDP or ODP. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, and the secondary outcomes were overall survival, R0 resection rate, and retrieved lymph node numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 481 eligible pancreatic cancer patients between Jan. 9, 2019 and Dec. 8, 2021, 306 candidates were initially enrolled and randomly assigned at 1:1 to receive either LDP or ODP. The last follow-up was performed on Dec. 15, 2023, and 130 patients in the LDP group and 129 patients in the ODP group were included for per-protocol analysis. Median RFS was 15.5 (12.5-18.5) months in the LDP group compared to 15 (9.5-20.5) months in the ODP group (P=0.471). The R0 resection rate in two groups was 88.5% versus 89.1%, respectively. Median retrieved lymph node numbers in two groups were similar (13.5 [10-20] versus 12 [7-17], P=0.165). Complications with a Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3 occurred in 10 of 130 patients in the LDP group, and 11 of 129 patients in the ODP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although LDP did not provide significant oncological benefits for left-sided pancreatic cancer, it was safe and applicable appropriate. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792932.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the oncological superiority of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer.

Background: The oncological efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer remains controversial.

Methods: We performed a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer patients. Candidates were recruited from six centers in China, and randomly assigned to receive either LDP or ODP. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, and the secondary outcomes were overall survival, R0 resection rate, and retrieved lymph node numbers.

Results: Of the 481 eligible pancreatic cancer patients between Jan. 9, 2019 and Dec. 8, 2021, 306 candidates were initially enrolled and randomly assigned at 1:1 to receive either LDP or ODP. The last follow-up was performed on Dec. 15, 2023, and 130 patients in the LDP group and 129 patients in the ODP group were included for per-protocol analysis. Median RFS was 15.5 (12.5-18.5) months in the LDP group compared to 15 (9.5-20.5) months in the ODP group (P=0.471). The R0 resection rate in two groups was 88.5% versus 89.1%, respectively. Median retrieved lymph node numbers in two groups were similar (13.5 [10-20] versus 12 [7-17], P=0.165). Complications with a Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3 occurred in 10 of 130 patients in the LDP group, and 11 of 129 patients in the ODP group.

Conclusion: Although LDP did not provide significant oncological benefits for left-sided pancreatic cancer, it was safe and applicable appropriate. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03792932.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信