Telehealth after lockdown: evaluating a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Thomas Neerhut MD, Kathryn McLeod MBBS, MSurgEd, FRACS (Urol), Stuart Willder MNSc, Benjamin Harrison MBBS, Alexander Mills MD, Richard Grills MBBS, FRACS (Urol)
{"title":"Telehealth after lockdown: evaluating a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic","authors":"Thomas Neerhut MD,&nbsp;Kathryn McLeod MBBS, MSurgEd, FRACS (Urol),&nbsp;Stuart Willder MNSc,&nbsp;Benjamin Harrison MBBS,&nbsp;Alexander Mills MD,&nbsp;Richard Grills MBBS, FRACS (Urol)","doi":"10.1111/ans.19419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021–2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 4","pages":"766-772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.

Methods

Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021–2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.

Results

Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.

Conclusion

Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.

Abstract Image

封锁后的远程医疗:评估大流行前后的区域泌尿远程医疗服务。
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行促进了远程医疗在澳大利亚的迅速普及。迄今为止,没有研究分析了患者在大流行前后对区域泌尿科远程保健服务的看法。凭借超过10年的经验,提供远程医疗西南维多利亚州,我们的目标是突出区域泌尿远程医疗服务的好处,局限性和进步。方法:邀请参加我们2017年调查并在2021-2023年期间继续进行泌尿科远程医疗咨询的居住在西维多利亚州的区域患者参加我们的2023年调查。问题包括简答题和多项选择题。78例患者符合纳入标准,42例回复。数据分析采用混合方法。结果:2017年患者的总体看法是有利的,并且在整个大流行期间有所改善。最大的改进体现在性能方面:总体满意度、技术方面、理解能力和经济效益。大流行之后,患者准备前往进行面对面检查的距离减少了,与面对面咨询相比,对远程医疗的偏好增加了近20%。然而,专题分析揭示了个性化护理的丧失、技术缺陷、固定信念和不适当的任命是这种护理模式的局限性。结论:患者对区域泌尿远程医疗服务的看法绝大多数是积极的,突出了泌尿远程医疗在向区域人口提供公平的泌尿保健方面的重要地位。总体而言,2019冠状病毒病后,患者对远程医疗服务及其在为地区患者提供及时、支持性和高质量泌尿科护理方面的作用的看法有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信