Thomas Neerhut MD, Kathryn McLeod MBBS, MSurgEd, FRACS (Urol), Stuart Willder MNSc, Benjamin Harrison MBBS, Alexander Mills MD, Richard Grills MBBS, FRACS (Urol)
{"title":"Telehealth after lockdown: evaluating a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic","authors":"Thomas Neerhut MD, Kathryn McLeod MBBS, MSurgEd, FRACS (Urol), Stuart Willder MNSc, Benjamin Harrison MBBS, Alexander Mills MD, Richard Grills MBBS, FRACS (Urol)","doi":"10.1111/ans.19419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021–2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 4","pages":"766-772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.
Methods
Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021–2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.
Results
Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.
Conclusion
Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.