Thomas Neerhut, Kathryn McLeod, Stuart Willder, Benjamin Harrison, Alexander Mills, Richard Grills
{"title":"Telehealth after lockdown: evaluating a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic.","authors":"Thomas Neerhut, Kathryn McLeod, Stuart Willder, Benjamin Harrison, Alexander Mills, Richard Grills","doi":"10.1111/ans.19419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021-2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic facilitated the rapid uptake of telehealth Australia wide. To date, no studies have analysed patient perceptions of a regional urological telehealth service before and after the pandemic. With over 10 years of experience delivering telehealth to Southwest Victoria, we aim to highlight the benefits, limitations and progress of a regional urological telehealth service.
Methods: Regional patients living within Western Victoria who participated in our 2017 survey and continued their urological telehealth consultations throughout 2021-2023 were invited to participate in our 2023 survey. Questions were both short answer and multiple choice. Seventy-eight patients met inclusion criteria, and 42 responses were returned. Data analysis utilized a mixed methods approach.
Results: Overall patient perceptions were favourable in 2017 and improved throughout the Pandemic. The greatest improvements were seen within the performance areas: overall satisfaction, technological aspects, comprehension and financial benefits. Following the pandemic, the distance patients were prepared to travel for face-to-face reviews decreased and preferences for telehealth compared to face-to-face consultations increased by almost 20%. However thematic analysis revealed loss of personalized care, technological faults, fixed beliefs and unsuitable appointments as limitations of this model of care.
Conclusion: Patients' perspectives of a regional urological telehealth service were overwhelmingly positive highlighting the vital place of urological telehealth in the delivery of equitable urological healthcare to a regional population. Overall, post COVID-19 there were improved patient perceptions of a telehealth service and its role in providing regional patients with the provision of timely, supportive and high-quality urological care.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.