Capturing what matters: Patient-reported LGI1-ANTibody encephalitis outcome RatiNg scale (LANTERN)

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mark J Kelly, Barbara Wagner, Bryan Ceronie, Christine Strippel, Ann Yee Lin, Adam Handel, John Soltys, Sophie Binks, Philip A Powell, Sarosh R Irani
{"title":"Capturing what matters: Patient-reported LGI1-ANTibody encephalitis outcome RatiNg scale (LANTERN)","authors":"Mark J Kelly,&nbsp;Barbara Wagner,&nbsp;Bryan Ceronie,&nbsp;Christine Strippel,&nbsp;Ann Yee Lin,&nbsp;Adam Handel,&nbsp;John Soltys,&nbsp;Sophie Binks,&nbsp;Philip A Powell,&nbsp;Sarosh R Irani","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>LGI1-antibody encephalitis (LGI1-Ab-E) is a common form of autoimmune encephalitis where most patients demonstrate ‘good’ clinician-rated outcomes. However, more targeted questionnaires reveal numerous debilitating symptoms for many years. To better quantify these persistent features, we designed the <span>L</span>GI1-<span>Ant</span>ibody <span>E</span>ncephalitis <span>R</span>ati<span>n</span>g (LANTERN) scale, a quantified, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), adhering to FDA guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A participant-driven mixed-methods approach to develop a clinically valid questionnaire over three stages: (1) Item generation through semi-structured interviews; (2) Repeated cognitive debriefing rounds to advance comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness; (3) Psychometric survey to condense the most sensitive and valid questions. Analyses incorporated sensitivity testing with multiple internal and external validations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 73 items across six domains (Stage 1; <i>n</i> = 18), a questionnaire assessing the frequency and severity of 43 symptoms (80 questions), plus nine activities of daily living (ADL), was developed through cognitive debriefing (Stage 2; <i>n</i> = 15). This 89-question survey was completed (Stage 3; <i>n</i> = 66 patients and 32 relatives) and distilled, using exploratory factor analyses, to a three-factor symptom-burden questionnaire comprising 41 questions (19 symptoms and 6 ADL), separated into physical, cognitive/behavioural and ADL domains. These factors demonstrated strong internal reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.85–0.91), correlations with relative-completed questionnaires (<i>R</i> = 0.73–0.85; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), good-to-excellent intraclass re-testing correlations (0.81–0.98; <i>n</i> = 19) and strong associations with numerous predefined external measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>LANTERN represents a PROM for LGI1-Ab-E, with initial content, structural and construct validity and test–retest reliability. It can be used as a reliable, tailored, efficient and sensitive method to establish symptom burden in people with LGI1-Ab-E, both in clinical practice and trials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 4","pages":"821-831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

LGI1-antibody encephalitis (LGI1-Ab-E) is a common form of autoimmune encephalitis where most patients demonstrate ‘good’ clinician-rated outcomes. However, more targeted questionnaires reveal numerous debilitating symptoms for many years. To better quantify these persistent features, we designed the LGI1-Antibody Encephalitis Rating (LANTERN) scale, a quantified, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), adhering to FDA guidelines.

Methods

A participant-driven mixed-methods approach to develop a clinically valid questionnaire over three stages: (1) Item generation through semi-structured interviews; (2) Repeated cognitive debriefing rounds to advance comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness; (3) Psychometric survey to condense the most sensitive and valid questions. Analyses incorporated sensitivity testing with multiple internal and external validations.

Results

From 73 items across six domains (Stage 1; n = 18), a questionnaire assessing the frequency and severity of 43 symptoms (80 questions), plus nine activities of daily living (ADL), was developed through cognitive debriefing (Stage 2; n = 15). This 89-question survey was completed (Stage 3; n = 66 patients and 32 relatives) and distilled, using exploratory factor analyses, to a three-factor symptom-burden questionnaire comprising 41 questions (19 symptoms and 6 ADL), separated into physical, cognitive/behavioural and ADL domains. These factors demonstrated strong internal reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.85–0.91), correlations with relative-completed questionnaires (R = 0.73–0.85; p < 0.001), good-to-excellent intraclass re-testing correlations (0.81–0.98; n = 19) and strong associations with numerous predefined external measures.

Discussion

LANTERN represents a PROM for LGI1-Ab-E, with initial content, structural and construct validity and test–retest reliability. It can be used as a reliable, tailored, efficient and sensitive method to establish symptom burden in people with LGI1-Ab-E, both in clinical practice and trials.

Abstract Image

捕捉重要信息:患者报告的 LGI1-ANTibody 脑炎结果比值表(LANTERN)。
背景:lgi1抗体脑炎(LGI1-Ab-E)是一种常见的自身免疫性脑炎,大多数患者表现出“良好”的临床评价结果。然而,更有针对性的调查问卷揭示了许多年来的衰弱症状。为了更好地量化这些持续性特征,我们设计了lgi1抗体脑炎分级(LANTERN)量表,这是一种量化的疾病特异性患者报告的结果测量(PROM),遵循FDA指南。方法:采用参与者驱动的混合方法,分三个阶段编制临床有效的问卷:(1)通过半结构化访谈生成项目;(2)反复进行认知汇报,提高可理解性、相关性和全面性;(3)心理测量调查,浓缩最敏感、最有效的问题。分析结合了多个内部和外部验证的灵敏度测试。结果:从6个领域的73个项目(阶段1;n = 18),通过认知述评(第二阶段;n = 15)。这个89个问题的调查已经完成(第三阶段;n = 66名患者和32名亲属),并通过探索性因素分析,提炼出一份包括41个问题(19个症状和6个ADL)的三因素症状负担问卷,分为身体、认知/行为和ADL领域。这些因素具有较强的内部信度(Cronbach alpha: 0.85-0.91),与相对完成问卷的相关性(R = 0.73-0.85;p讨论:LANTERN代表LGI1-Ab-E的PROM,具有初始内容、结构和构造效度以及重测信度。无论是在临床实践还是试验中,它都可以作为一种可靠、量身定制、高效和敏感的方法来确定LGI1-Ab-E患者的症状负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信