The commodity constrained split delivery vehicle routing problem considering carbon emission: Formulations and a branch-and-cut method

IF 2.1 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Kamyla Maria Ferreira , Claudia Archetti , Diego Delle Donne , Reinaldo Morabito , Pedro Munari
{"title":"The commodity constrained split delivery vehicle routing problem considering carbon emission: Formulations and a branch-and-cut method","authors":"Kamyla Maria Ferreira ,&nbsp;Claudia Archetti ,&nbsp;Diego Delle Donne ,&nbsp;Reinaldo Morabito ,&nbsp;Pedro Munari","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtl.2025.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper introduces the Green Commodity constrained Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem (GC-SDVRP), which involves designing efficient and environmentally friendly delivery routes that reduce the CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions associated with transporting multiple commodities. In this problem, different commodities demanded by a customer can be delivered by one or more vehicles, if beneficial, which poses additional modeling and solution challenges. We propose a relaxed formulation that provides a lower bound on the optimal value of the GC-SDVRP, and adapt two other formulations from the literature to address this problem. Additionally, we develop a branch-and-cut (BC) method based on two of these formulations, and introduce a procedure for deriving feasible solutions to the GC-SDVRP from solutions obtained with the relaxed formulations. The results of computational experiments performed on benchmark instances indicate the superior performance of the BC method based on the proposed formulation. Furthermore, they show that, contrary to the traditional objective of minimizing distance, the GC-SDVRP is significantly easier to solve to optimality and can reduce CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions by 2.59% compared to the problem that minimizes total travel distance. Our investigation also reveals that increasing vehicle capacity improves solution quality in the GC-SDVRP, while split delivery can enable further reductions in CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions. Finally, although increasing the number of commodities imposes challenges in solving the problem, the possibility of split delivery mitigates its impact on the value of the final solution, indicating that an increase in the number of commodities does not necessarily result in higher CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45871,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192437625000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the Green Commodity constrained Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem (GC-SDVRP), which involves designing efficient and environmentally friendly delivery routes that reduce the CO2 emissions associated with transporting multiple commodities. In this problem, different commodities demanded by a customer can be delivered by one or more vehicles, if beneficial, which poses additional modeling and solution challenges. We propose a relaxed formulation that provides a lower bound on the optimal value of the GC-SDVRP, and adapt two other formulations from the literature to address this problem. Additionally, we develop a branch-and-cut (BC) method based on two of these formulations, and introduce a procedure for deriving feasible solutions to the GC-SDVRP from solutions obtained with the relaxed formulations. The results of computational experiments performed on benchmark instances indicate the superior performance of the BC method based on the proposed formulation. Furthermore, they show that, contrary to the traditional objective of minimizing distance, the GC-SDVRP is significantly easier to solve to optimality and can reduce CO2 emissions by 2.59% compared to the problem that minimizes total travel distance. Our investigation also reveals that increasing vehicle capacity improves solution quality in the GC-SDVRP, while split delivery can enable further reductions in CO2 emissions. Finally, although increasing the number of commodities imposes challenges in solving the problem, the possibility of split delivery mitigates its impact on the value of the final solution, indicating that an increase in the number of commodities does not necessarily result in higher CO2 emissions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
129 days
期刊介绍: The EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics promotes the use of mathematics in general, and operations research in particular, in the context of transportation and logistics. It is a forum for the presentation of original mathematical models, methodologies and computational results, focussing on advanced applications in transportation and logistics. The journal publishes two types of document: (i) research articles and (ii) tutorials. A research article presents original methodological contributions to the field (e.g. new mathematical models, new algorithms, new simulation techniques). A tutorial provides an introduction to an advanced topic, designed to ease the use of the relevant methodology by researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信