Prophylactic Defibrotide in High-Risk Pediatric HSCT: Solution or New Set of Challenges?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Archana Ramgopal DO , Breana K. Goscicki PharmD, BCPPS , Shiva Sridar BS , Li Wang , Daniel Klein , Tsuyoshi Fujita MD , Ram Kalpatthi MD , Jignesh Dalal MD
{"title":"Prophylactic Defibrotide in High-Risk Pediatric HSCT: Solution or New Set of Challenges?","authors":"Archana Ramgopal DO ,&nbsp;Breana K. Goscicki PharmD, BCPPS ,&nbsp;Shiva Sridar BS ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Daniel Klein ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Fujita MD ,&nbsp;Ram Kalpatthi MD ,&nbsp;Jignesh Dalal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication that can arise after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in high-risk pediatric patients. Despite some understanding of key risk factors, a detailed review of these high-risk groups in the U.S. is essential to better assess the contributing factors, healthcare implications, and patient outcomes associated with prophylactic defibrotide use. Previous studies, including one that was terminated early due to lack of efficacy, have not provided conclusive results on its effectiveness. However, its use persists, making it important to evaluate its real-world efficacy in preventing SOS and its effect on patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on 10,250 patient encounters involving 8,200 unique pediatric patients. The study population was divided into high-risk (n=9,584) and very high-risk (n=666) groups based on the Harmony trial criteria. High-risk patients were defined by factors such as prior transplants, active infections, use of hepatotoxic medications, or advanced disease. Very high-risk patients had multiple risk factors or significant liver dysfunction. The patients were divided into three categories: those who received no defibrotide (n=9,606), prophylactic defibrotide (n=344), and treatment defibrotide (n=683). Data were analyzed for outcomes such as the development of SOS, duration of hospital stays, ICU admissions, mortality rates, and costs. The analysis used a mixed-effects regression model, with statistical significance set at p&lt;0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>In the high-risk group, SOS occurred in 1.4% of patients who did not receive defibrotide compared to 26.5% in those who did. For the very high-risk group, SOS occurred in 2.4% of patients without defibrotide and 31.0% in those with prophylactic use. Median hospital stays for high-risk patients were 32 days in the no defibrotide group vs. 40 days in the prophylactic group (p&lt;0.001). ICU admissions were significantly higher in the prophylactic group (50.7% vs. 30.4%, p&lt;0.001). Mortality was also higher for the prophylactic group (7.9% vs. 2.6%, p&lt;0.001), with increased costs for prophylactic defibrotide patients. Similarly, acute GVHD, infections, and sepsis rates were elevated in the prophylactic group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prophylactic defibrotide does not seem to lower the occurrence of SOS in high and very high-risk pediatric HSCT patients. Instead, it is linked to higher rates of ICU admissions, longer hospitalizations, increased mortality, and elevated costs. The findings suggest a need for alternative preventative approaches and additional studies to improve SOS prevention in this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":"31 2","pages":"Page S27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666636725000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a life-threatening complication that can arise after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in high-risk pediatric patients. Despite some understanding of key risk factors, a detailed review of these high-risk groups in the U.S. is essential to better assess the contributing factors, healthcare implications, and patient outcomes associated with prophylactic defibrotide use. Previous studies, including one that was terminated early due to lack of efficacy, have not provided conclusive results on its effectiveness. However, its use persists, making it important to evaluate its real-world efficacy in preventing SOS and its effect on patient outcomes.

Study Design

A retrospective study was conducted on 10,250 patient encounters involving 8,200 unique pediatric patients. The study population was divided into high-risk (n=9,584) and very high-risk (n=666) groups based on the Harmony trial criteria. High-risk patients were defined by factors such as prior transplants, active infections, use of hepatotoxic medications, or advanced disease. Very high-risk patients had multiple risk factors or significant liver dysfunction. The patients were divided into three categories: those who received no defibrotide (n=9,606), prophylactic defibrotide (n=344), and treatment defibrotide (n=683). Data were analyzed for outcomes such as the development of SOS, duration of hospital stays, ICU admissions, mortality rates, and costs. The analysis used a mixed-effects regression model, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Findings

In the high-risk group, SOS occurred in 1.4% of patients who did not receive defibrotide compared to 26.5% in those who did. For the very high-risk group, SOS occurred in 2.4% of patients without defibrotide and 31.0% in those with prophylactic use. Median hospital stays for high-risk patients were 32 days in the no defibrotide group vs. 40 days in the prophylactic group (p<0.001). ICU admissions were significantly higher in the prophylactic group (50.7% vs. 30.4%, p<0.001). Mortality was also higher for the prophylactic group (7.9% vs. 2.6%, p<0.001), with increased costs for prophylactic defibrotide patients. Similarly, acute GVHD, infections, and sepsis rates were elevated in the prophylactic group.

Conclusion

Prophylactic defibrotide does not seem to lower the occurrence of SOS in high and very high-risk pediatric HSCT patients. Instead, it is linked to higher rates of ICU admissions, longer hospitalizations, increased mortality, and elevated costs. The findings suggest a need for alternative preventative approaches and additional studies to improve SOS prevention in this patient population.
高危儿童造血干细胞移植预防性去纤肽:解决方案还是新挑战?
鼻窦阻塞综合征(SOS)是造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后可能出现的危及生命的并发症,特别是在高危儿科患者中。尽管对关键的危险因素有一定的了解,但对美国这些高危人群进行详细的回顾对于更好地评估与预防性使用去纤维肽相关的影响因素、保健意义和患者结果是必要的。以前的研究,包括一项因缺乏疗效而提前终止的研究,都没有提供关于其有效性的结论性结果。然而,它的使用仍然存在,因此评估其在预防SOS方面的实际功效及其对患者预后的影响非常重要。研究设计:对10250例患者进行回顾性研究,涉及8200例特殊儿科患者。根据Harmony试验标准,将研究人群分为高危组(n= 9584)和高危组(n=666)。高危患者由诸如既往移植、活动性感染、使用肝毒性药物或疾病晚期等因素定义。高危患者有多种危险因素或明显的肝功能障碍。患者被分为三组:未使用去纤维肽组(n= 9606)、预防性去纤维肽组(n=344)和治疗性去纤维肽组(n=683)。对结果数据进行分析,如SOS的发展、住院时间、ICU入院率、死亡率和费用。分析采用混合效应回归模型,统计学显著性设置为p<;0.05。在高危组中,未接受去纤肽治疗的患者发生SOS的比例为1.4%,而接受去纤肽治疗的患者发生SOS的比例为26.5%。在高危人群中,未使用去纤维肽的患者发生SOS的比例为2.4%,预防性使用去纤维肽的患者发生SOS的比例为31.0%。未使用去纤维肽组高危患者的中位住院时间为32天,而预防性组为40天(p < 0.001)。预防组的ICU入院率显著高于对照组(50.7% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001)。预防组的死亡率也更高(7.9% vs. 2.6%, p&t;0.001),预防性去纤维肽患者的费用增加。同样,预防组的急性GVHD、感染和败血症发生率升高。结论预防性去纤维肽似乎并不能降低高危儿童HSCT患者SOS的发生。相反,它与更高的ICU入院率、更长的住院时间、更高的死亡率和更高的费用有关。研究结果表明,需要替代的预防方法和额外的研究,以提高该患者群体的SOS预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信