Hearing loss assessment by pure tone audiometry amongst the survivors of intensive care unit: A prospective observational cohort study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Sai Saran , Abhishek Bahadur Singh , Avinash Agrawal , Saumitra Misra , Suhail Sarwar Siddiqui , Ayush Lohiya , Prabhaker Misra
{"title":"Hearing loss assessment by pure tone audiometry amongst the survivors of intensive care unit: A prospective observational cohort study","authors":"Sai Saran ,&nbsp;Abhishek Bahadur Singh ,&nbsp;Avinash Agrawal ,&nbsp;Saumitra Misra ,&nbsp;Suhail Sarwar Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Ayush Lohiya ,&nbsp;Prabhaker Misra","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess hearing deficits (HD) through pure tone audiometry (PTA), amongst the survivors of intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective observational study, ICU survivors aged 18 years and above were subjected to PTA and were classified into two groups based on PTA findings as those “with HD” and “without HD”. Demographic and clinical factors were compared between these groups with a <em>p</em>-value of ≤0.05 considered as significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and two survivors were enrolled with a median age of 25.5 years (23–30.5), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score of 19 (14–22). Sixty were diagnosed (58.89 %) with HD based on PTA, and forty-two (41.2 %) without HD. More than 80 % of the survivors (52/60) had sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Propensity match analysis, after the exact matching of the APACHE-II score between those “with HD” and “without HD”, revealed that patients with HD had a longer duration of shock days (mean ± SD) (0.96 ± 1.24 vs 1.68 ± 1.28; <em>p</em> value: 0.022), received higher maximum noradrenaline dose (0.03 v/s 0.06 μg/kg/min; p value: 0.004), longer duration of endotracheal tube (2.04 ± 1.17 vs 3.52 ± 2.06) days; p value:0.009), more days on mechanical ventilation (2.24 ± 1.33 vs 4.44 ± 5.12; p value: 0.011), and length of stay in the ICU (7.2 ± 3.8 vs 9.24 ± 4.68; p value: 0.013) than those without HD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hearing deficits are present in majority of the survivors of critical illness and audiometric screening is recommended.</div><div><strong>Trial Registration:</strong> Clinical trials registry. India (CTRI/2022/01/039539) dated 18.01.2022. <span><span>https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 155042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125000292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess hearing deficits (HD) through pure tone audiometry (PTA), amongst the survivors of intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

In this prospective observational study, ICU survivors aged 18 years and above were subjected to PTA and were classified into two groups based on PTA findings as those “with HD” and “without HD”. Demographic and clinical factors were compared between these groups with a p-value of ≤0.05 considered as significant.

Results

One hundred and two survivors were enrolled with a median age of 25.5 years (23–30.5), and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score of 19 (14–22). Sixty were diagnosed (58.89 %) with HD based on PTA, and forty-two (41.2 %) without HD. More than 80 % of the survivors (52/60) had sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Propensity match analysis, after the exact matching of the APACHE-II score between those “with HD” and “without HD”, revealed that patients with HD had a longer duration of shock days (mean ± SD) (0.96 ± 1.24 vs 1.68 ± 1.28; p value: 0.022), received higher maximum noradrenaline dose (0.03 v/s 0.06 μg/kg/min; p value: 0.004), longer duration of endotracheal tube (2.04 ± 1.17 vs 3.52 ± 2.06) days; p value:0.009), more days on mechanical ventilation (2.24 ± 1.33 vs 4.44 ± 5.12; p value: 0.011), and length of stay in the ICU (7.2 ± 3.8 vs 9.24 ± 4.68; p value: 0.013) than those without HD.

Conclusions

Hearing deficits are present in majority of the survivors of critical illness and audiometric screening is recommended.
Trial Registration: Clinical trials registry. India (CTRI/2022/01/039539) dated 18.01.2022. https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信