Economic inequality and the monetary reward in a robbery

Stewart J. D'Alessio , Lisa Stolzenberg , Jamie L. Flexon
{"title":"Economic inequality and the monetary reward in a robbery","authors":"Stewart J. D'Alessio ,&nbsp;Lisa Stolzenberg ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Flexon","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between economic inequality and violent crime is usually equated with rational choice or strain theory, although adjudicating between these two distinct perspectives is exceedingly burdensome because their respective predictions are analogous. Multilevel data for 66 cities located across the U.S. are analyzed to evaluate whether economic inequality influences the financial reward (cash/property) derived from a robbery. While rational choice theory proffers that economic inequality increases the monetary reward in a robbery because of the greater availability of lucrative targets to victimize, strain theory makes no such prediction. Results cast doubt on rational choice theory because economic inequality fails to predict the financial reward acquired in a robbery. However, an offender’s monetary reward in cities plagued by economic inequality is observed to be more substantive when a firearm is employed during the commission of a robbery. This latter finding suggests that robbers may be employing firearms in cities plagued by economic inequality to victimize potentially wealthy targets who are likely better protected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Criminology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949791425000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between economic inequality and violent crime is usually equated with rational choice or strain theory, although adjudicating between these two distinct perspectives is exceedingly burdensome because their respective predictions are analogous. Multilevel data for 66 cities located across the U.S. are analyzed to evaluate whether economic inequality influences the financial reward (cash/property) derived from a robbery. While rational choice theory proffers that economic inequality increases the monetary reward in a robbery because of the greater availability of lucrative targets to victimize, strain theory makes no such prediction. Results cast doubt on rational choice theory because economic inequality fails to predict the financial reward acquired in a robbery. However, an offender’s monetary reward in cities plagued by economic inequality is observed to be more substantive when a firearm is employed during the commission of a robbery. This latter finding suggests that robbers may be employing firearms in cities plagued by economic inequality to victimize potentially wealthy targets who are likely better protected.
经济不平等和抢劫中的金钱奖励
经济不平等和暴力犯罪之间的关系通常被等同于理性选择或压力理论,尽管在这两种截然不同的观点之间做出裁决是极其繁重的,因为它们各自的预测是相似的。本文分析了美国66个城市的多层次数据,以评估经济不平等是否会影响抢劫所得的经济奖励(现金/财产)。理性选择理论认为,经济不平等增加了抢劫的金钱回报,因为更容易找到有利可图的目标,而紧张理论没有这样的预测。研究结果对理性选择理论提出了质疑,因为经济不平等无法预测抢劫中获得的经济回报。然而,在受经济不平等困扰的城市,如果在抢劫过程中使用枪支,罪犯的金钱奖励就会更加丰厚。后一项发现表明,在受经济不平等困扰的城市,劫匪可能会使用枪支来伤害那些可能受到更好保护的潜在富人目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信