Research-Infused Courses are Effective for Online and In-Person Education.

Erin H Arruda, Arturo R Zavala, Panadda Marayong, Jesse Dillon, Chi-Ah Chun, Kim-Phuong L Vu
{"title":"Research-Infused Courses are Effective for Online and In-Person Education.","authors":"Erin H Arruda, Arturo R Zavala, Panadda Marayong, Jesse Dillon, Chi-Ah Chun, Kim-Phuong L Vu","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1005753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engaging students in research is a high impact practice known to increase underrepresented students' persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields and improve their graduation rates. For broad impact, research infusion can be implemented through careful redesign of courses or through the adoption of research modules to supplement class instruction and existing student training programs. In this paper, we present data on a program for the design and implementation of research-infused curricula in major courses across a variety of STEM and related disciplines. Specifically, the Research Across the Curriculum program's goal was to have faculty engage in a redesign of a class to exemplify how specific disciplines engage in research. Fourteen courses were included in the present analysis, and the redesigned components were implemented in the form of interactive activities for in-person or online learning. Overall, the redesigned courses had a large impact on student's perceptions of gains in research skills. Students reported moderate to good gains in understanding the relevance of research in their discipline and skills important to research like problem solving, understanding research papers, and interpreting research results. The modality of the course (online vs. face-to-face) had little impact. Thus, research-focused activities intentionally embedded in courses strengthen the research foundation of students and should be encouraged as a high-impact practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520077,"journal":{"name":"Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference","volume":"159 ","pages":"1860-1870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1005753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engaging students in research is a high impact practice known to increase underrepresented students' persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields and improve their graduation rates. For broad impact, research infusion can be implemented through careful redesign of courses or through the adoption of research modules to supplement class instruction and existing student training programs. In this paper, we present data on a program for the design and implementation of research-infused curricula in major courses across a variety of STEM and related disciplines. Specifically, the Research Across the Curriculum program's goal was to have faculty engage in a redesign of a class to exemplify how specific disciplines engage in research. Fourteen courses were included in the present analysis, and the redesigned components were implemented in the form of interactive activities for in-person or online learning. Overall, the redesigned courses had a large impact on student's perceptions of gains in research skills. Students reported moderate to good gains in understanding the relevance of research in their discipline and skills important to research like problem solving, understanding research papers, and interpreting research results. The modality of the course (online vs. face-to-face) had little impact. Thus, research-focused activities intentionally embedded in courses strengthen the research foundation of students and should be encouraged as a high-impact practice.

研究型课程对在线和面对面教育都很有效。
让学生参与研究是一种高影响力的做法,可以增加代表性不足的学生在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的坚持,并提高他们的毕业率。为了产生广泛的影响,研究注入可以通过仔细重新设计课程或通过采用研究模块来补充课堂教学和现有的学生培训计划来实现。在本文中,我们提供了关于在各种STEM和相关学科的主要课程中设计和实施研究型课程的计划的数据。具体来说,跨课程研究计划的目标是让教师参与重新设计课程,以举例说明特定学科如何参与研究。本分析包括14门课程,重新设计的组成部分以面对面或在线学习的互动活动形式实施。总体而言,重新设计的课程对学生对研究技能提高的看法产生了很大影响。学生们报告说,他们在理解本学科研究的相关性和解决问题、理解研究论文和解释研究结果等重要研究技能方面取得了中等到良好的进展。课程的形式(在线vs.面对面)影响不大。因此,有意在课程中嵌入以研究为中心的活动可以加强学生的研究基础,应该鼓励作为一种高影响的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信