Carol Gonzalez, Douglas G Chang, Thomas Rutledge, Erik J Groessl
{"title":"Promoting Adherence to a Yoga Intervention for Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain.","authors":"Carol Gonzalez, Douglas G Chang, Thomas Rutledge, Erik J Groessl","doi":"10.1177/27536130251323247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research demonstrates that yoga can be effective for improving chronic low back pain (cLBP) among military veterans and non-veterans. Attendance of yoga interventions is necessary to obtain benefits, yet yoga class attendance can be a challenge both within and outside of research, especially for persons who lack resources.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to describe efforts to boost attendance within a randomized trial of yoga for cLBP, and to examine factors related to attendance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previous trial of yoga for cLBP among military veterans randomly assigned participants to 2x weekly yoga for 12 weeks, or delayed treatment. After the second of 6 intervention cohorts, efforts were made to improve participant attendance. Attendance and reasons for missing yoga sessions were tracked using sign-in logs and phone calls. Regression analysis was used to examine factors related to attendance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After efforts to boost attendance, mean attendance increased from 10.2/24 sessions, (42% attending at least half of sessions), to 13.3/24 sessions, (df (1,74), t = -1.44; <i>P</i> = 0.15) (59% attending half of the sessions). The most common reasons for non-attendance were transportation, financial problems, other health issues, and work or school conflicts. Living status and back pain-related disability at baseline were significantly associated with attendance (<i>P</i>= < .001 and <i>P</i> = .038 respectively). When including all participants, yoga session attendance was significantly associated with reduced pain severity (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efforts to boost attendance appeared meaningful but the changes were not statistically significant. Attendance rate in later cohorts were comparable to those in other studies. Reasons provided for non-attendance by participants, and the regression results suggest that resources such as transportation, a stable living situation, and disability levels at baseline were related to attendance rates for this in-person intervention. Remotely delivered yoga may address some of these barriers but hybrid interventions that bring in-person yoga closer to participants may be the best option.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"14 ","pages":"27536130251323247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130251323247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research demonstrates that yoga can be effective for improving chronic low back pain (cLBP) among military veterans and non-veterans. Attendance of yoga interventions is necessary to obtain benefits, yet yoga class attendance can be a challenge both within and outside of research, especially for persons who lack resources.
Objective: Our objective was to describe efforts to boost attendance within a randomized trial of yoga for cLBP, and to examine factors related to attendance.
Methods: A previous trial of yoga for cLBP among military veterans randomly assigned participants to 2x weekly yoga for 12 weeks, or delayed treatment. After the second of 6 intervention cohorts, efforts were made to improve participant attendance. Attendance and reasons for missing yoga sessions were tracked using sign-in logs and phone calls. Regression analysis was used to examine factors related to attendance.
Results: After efforts to boost attendance, mean attendance increased from 10.2/24 sessions, (42% attending at least half of sessions), to 13.3/24 sessions, (df (1,74), t = -1.44; P = 0.15) (59% attending half of the sessions). The most common reasons for non-attendance were transportation, financial problems, other health issues, and work or school conflicts. Living status and back pain-related disability at baseline were significantly associated with attendance (P= < .001 and P = .038 respectively). When including all participants, yoga session attendance was significantly associated with reduced pain severity (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: Efforts to boost attendance appeared meaningful but the changes were not statistically significant. Attendance rate in later cohorts were comparable to those in other studies. Reasons provided for non-attendance by participants, and the regression results suggest that resources such as transportation, a stable living situation, and disability levels at baseline were related to attendance rates for this in-person intervention. Remotely delivered yoga may address some of these barriers but hybrid interventions that bring in-person yoga closer to participants may be the best option.