In-Silico Investigation of 3D Quantitative Angiography for Internal Carotid Aneurysms Using Biplane Imaging and 3D Vascular Geometry Constraints.

ArXiv Pub Date : 2025-02-13
Kyle A Williams, Sv Setlur Nagesh, Daniel R Bednarek, Stephen Rudin, Ciprian Ionita
{"title":"In-Silico Investigation of 3D Quantitative Angiography for Internal Carotid Aneurysms Using Biplane Imaging and 3D Vascular Geometry Constraints.","authors":"Kyle A Williams, Sv Setlur Nagesh, Daniel R Bednarek, Stephen Rudin, Ciprian Ionita","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative angiography (QA) in two dimensions has been instrumental in assessing neurovascular contrast flow patterns, aiding disease severity evaluation and treatment outcome prediction using data-driven models. However, QA requires high temporal and spatial resolution, restricting its use to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 2D projective nature of DSA introduces errors and noise due to the inherently three-dimensional flow dynamics. This study examines whether 3D QA information can be recovered by reconstructing four-dimensional (4D) angiography using data from standard clinical imaging protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-specific 3D vascular geometries were used to generate high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of contrast flow in internal carotid aneurysms. The resulting 4D angiograms, representing ground truth, were used to simulate biplane DSA under clinical imaging protocols, including projection spacing and injection timing. 4D angiography was reconstructed from two views using back-projection constrained by an a priori 3D geometry. Quantitative angiographic parametric imaging (API) metrics obtained from the CFD-based 4D angiography and reconstructed 4D angiography, respectively, were compared using mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reconstructed 4D datasets effectively captured 3D flow dynamics, achieving an average MSE of 0.007 across models and flow conditions. API metrics such as PH and AUC closely matched the CFD ground truth, with temporal metrics showing some variability in regions with overlapping projections. These results demonstrate the potential to recover 3D QA information using simulated 4D angiography constrained by standard clinical imaging parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the feasibility of recovering 3D QA information from reconstructed 4D DSA simulated from biplane projections. The method provides a robust framework for evaluating and improving QA in clinical neurovascular applications, offering new insights into the dynamics of aneurysmal contrast flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative angiography (QA) in two dimensions has been instrumental in assessing neurovascular contrast flow patterns, aiding disease severity evaluation and treatment outcome prediction using data-driven models. However, QA requires high temporal and spatial resolution, restricting its use to digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Purpose: The 2D projective nature of DSA introduces errors and noise due to the inherently three-dimensional flow dynamics. This study examines whether 3D QA information can be recovered by reconstructing four-dimensional (4D) angiography using data from standard clinical imaging protocols.

Methods: Patient-specific 3D vascular geometries were used to generate high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of contrast flow in internal carotid aneurysms. The resulting 4D angiograms, representing ground truth, were used to simulate biplane DSA under clinical imaging protocols, including projection spacing and injection timing. 4D angiography was reconstructed from two views using back-projection constrained by an a priori 3D geometry. Quantitative angiographic parametric imaging (API) metrics obtained from the CFD-based 4D angiography and reconstructed 4D angiography, respectively, were compared using mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).

Results: The reconstructed 4D datasets effectively captured 3D flow dynamics, achieving an average MSE of 0.007 across models and flow conditions. API metrics such as PH and AUC closely matched the CFD ground truth, with temporal metrics showing some variability in regions with overlapping projections. These results demonstrate the potential to recover 3D QA information using simulated 4D angiography constrained by standard clinical imaging parameters.

Conclusions: This study highlights the feasibility of recovering 3D QA information from reconstructed 4D DSA simulated from biplane projections. The method provides a robust framework for evaluating and improving QA in clinical neurovascular applications, offering new insights into the dynamics of aneurysmal contrast flow.

利用双翼成像和三维血管几何约束的内颈动脉瘤三维定量血管成像的计算机研究。
二维定量血管造影(QA)在评估神经血管对比血流模式、帮助疾病严重程度和治疗结果评估方面发挥了重要作用。然而,QA需要高时空分辨率,限制了其在数字减影血管造影(DSA)中的应用,并且在高3D血流模式的量化方面容易出现错误。本研究探讨了是否可以通过使用标准临床成像方案的数据重建四维(4D)血管造影来恢复3D QA信息。患者特定的颈内动脉瘤模型用于生成高保真的对比血流计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟。所得到的四维血管图像用于模拟临床成像方案下的双翼DSA。利用先验三维几何约束的反向投影,从两个视图重建四维血管造影。采用均方误差(MSE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)对基于cfd的4D血管造影和重建4D血管造影获得的定量血管造影参数成像(API)指标进行比较。重建的四维数据集有效捕获了三维流动动力学,不同模型和流动条件下的平均MSE为0.007。API指标(如PH和AUC)与CFD的实际情况非常吻合,时间指标在重叠投影区域显示出一些变化。这些结果表明,在标准临床成像参数的约束下,使用模拟四维血管造影恢复3D QA信息的潜力。该方法为评估和改进临床神经血管应用中的QA提供了一个强大的框架,为动脉瘤造影剂血流动力学提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信