Patient Experience Scores for Telehealth Visits at an Outpatient Child Neurology Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2025.0004
Gogi Kumar, Laura D Fonseca, Sucheta Joshi, Grant Turek, Elizabeth A Ng, Irma Reyes
{"title":"Patient Experience Scores for Telehealth Visits at an Outpatient Child Neurology Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Gogi Kumar, Laura D Fonseca, Sucheta Joshi, Grant Turek, Elizabeth A Ng, Irma Reyes","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has been widely adopted, and several studies have highlighted the benefits of telehealth. However, there are limited studies in pediatric neurology with a focus on epilepsy. The objective of this single-site retrospective cohort study was to examine patient experience scores of telehealth versus in-person established encounters in an outpatient pediatric neurology clinic. <b>Methods:</b> Data were abstracted from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2024. Variables included demographics, appointment type (telehealth vs in-person), appointment date, primary diagnosis and net promoter score (NPS) number and category. A subanalysis of epilepsy diagnosed patients, and a matched patient analysis were conducted. <b>Results:</b> There were 2,863 in-person visit encounters and 635 telehealth visit encounters. Telehealth encounters had a statistically greater mean NPS of 9.7, compared with in-person visits (9.5). Both telehealth and in-person encounters had more than 90% of promoter scores, indicating a high score of 9-10. During the COVID-19 time period (defined as April 1, 2020 to May 4, 2023), NPS were higher with a mean of 9.7 for telehealth encounters, compared with in-person encounters (9.5). There were no differences in NPS post-COVID-19. Primary encounter diagnoses of Epilepsy/Seizure had a slightly greater mean NPS for telehealth visits (9.7) compared with in-person encounters (9.5). The matched patient analysis revealed no difference between telehealth and in-person encounter NPSs with means of 9.7 and 9.6, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> NPS, which are a measure of patient experience, were superior or equal to in-person visits for pediatric neurology telehealth encounters both during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the postpandemic period.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"875-884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has been widely adopted, and several studies have highlighted the benefits of telehealth. However, there are limited studies in pediatric neurology with a focus on epilepsy. The objective of this single-site retrospective cohort study was to examine patient experience scores of telehealth versus in-person established encounters in an outpatient pediatric neurology clinic. Methods: Data were abstracted from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2024. Variables included demographics, appointment type (telehealth vs in-person), appointment date, primary diagnosis and net promoter score (NPS) number and category. A subanalysis of epilepsy diagnosed patients, and a matched patient analysis were conducted. Results: There were 2,863 in-person visit encounters and 635 telehealth visit encounters. Telehealth encounters had a statistically greater mean NPS of 9.7, compared with in-person visits (9.5). Both telehealth and in-person encounters had more than 90% of promoter scores, indicating a high score of 9-10. During the COVID-19 time period (defined as April 1, 2020 to May 4, 2023), NPS were higher with a mean of 9.7 for telehealth encounters, compared with in-person encounters (9.5). There were no differences in NPS post-COVID-19. Primary encounter diagnoses of Epilepsy/Seizure had a slightly greater mean NPS for telehealth visits (9.7) compared with in-person encounters (9.5). The matched patient analysis revealed no difference between telehealth and in-person encounter NPSs with means of 9.7 and 9.6, respectively. Conclusion: NPS, which are a measure of patient experience, were superior or equal to in-person visits for pediatric neurology telehealth encounters both during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the postpandemic period.

儿童神经病学门诊远程医疗访问的患者体验评分:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,远程医疗得到了广泛采用,一些研究强调了远程医疗的好处。然而,在儿童神经病学中,专注于癫痫的研究有限。这项单点回顾性队列研究的目的是检查在门诊儿科神经病学诊所远程医疗与面对面接触的患者体验分数。方法:数据摘自2020年4月1日至2024年3月31日。变量包括人口统计、预约类型(远程医疗vs面对面)、预约日期、初次诊断和净推荐值(NPS)数量和类别。对癫痫诊断患者进行亚分析,并对患者进行匹配分析。结果:现场就诊2863次,远程就诊635次。与面对面就诊(9.5)相比,远程医疗就诊在统计上的平均NPS为9.7。远程医疗和面对面接触都有超过90%的促销员得分,表明9-10的高分。在2019冠状病毒病期间(定义为2020年4月1日至2023年5月4日),远程医疗就诊的平均NPS为9.7,高于现场就诊(9.5)。新冠肺炎后NPS无差异。与面对面就诊(9.5)相比,首次就诊诊断癫痫/癫痫发作的平均NPS(9.7)略高。匹配的患者分析显示,远程医疗和面对面就诊的nps分别为9.7和9.6,两者之间没有差异。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间和大流行后时期,NPS作为一种衡量患者体验的指标,优于或等于儿童神经病学远程医疗就诊的现场就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信