When Lateral Epicondylitis Is Not Lateral Epicondylitis: Analysis of the Risk Factors for the Misdiagnosis of Lateral Elbow Pain.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1177/03635465251319545
Davide Blonna, Norsaga Hoxha, Valentina Greco, Carolina Rivoira, Davide Edoardo Bonasia, Roberto Rossi
{"title":"When Lateral Epicondylitis Is Not Lateral Epicondylitis: Analysis of the Risk Factors for the Misdiagnosis of Lateral Elbow Pain.","authors":"Davide Blonna, Norsaga Hoxha, Valentina Greco, Carolina Rivoira, Davide Edoardo Bonasia, Roberto Rossi","doi":"10.1177/03635465251319545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral elbow pain, often attributed to lateral epicondylitis, presents diagnostic complexities. Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is the most frequent cause of lateral elbow pain, but a differential diagnosis among all the potential causes of lateral elbow pain is not easy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the rate of misdiagnoses in patients previously diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis, identify at-risk patient profiles, and determine sensitive clinical tests for a misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective analysis was conducted on 189 consecutive patients with a previous diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis and failed nonoperative treatment. According to medical history and a physical examination, patients were preliminarily classified into the typical or atypical lateral epicondylitis group. Atypical epicondylitis was defined as one of the following: atypical lateral pain location, history of trauma, limited range of motion (ROM), elbow swelling, negative Cozen test finding, and physical examination findings suggesting a misdiagnosis. Patients in the atypical group were further investigated for a potential lateral epicondylitis misdiagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and/or analysis of intraoperative samples according to suspected underlying abnormalities. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk of a misdiagnosis. A standardized diagnostic analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical tests used during the physical examination to identify misdiagnosed patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A misdiagnosis occurred in 21 of 189 (11%) patients. The most common misdiagnoses were posterolateral elbow instability in 6 patients; radial nerve compression and inflammatory osteoarthritis in 3 patients each; and osteochondritis dissecans, posterolateral plica, and primary osteoarthritis in 2 patients each. The variables associated with a misdiagnosis were young age (≤30 years; odds ratio [OR], 66.90; <i>P</i> < .001), history of trauma (OR, 17.85; <i>P</i> = .0027), history of a limitation of ROM and/or mechanical symptoms (OR, 16.68; <i>P</i> = .0278), history of elbow swelling (OR, 14.32; <i>P</i> = .0032), and number of corticosteroid injections (OR, 2.00; <i>P</i> = .0007). Atypical lateral pain location highly predicted a misdiagnosis, with a sensitivity of 90.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A misdiagnosis can occur in patients affected by longstanding lateral elbow pain. Young patients and patients with a history of elbow trauma, a limitation of ROM, swelling, corticosteroid injections, and atypical lateral pain should be highly suspected for a misdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1195-1201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251319545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral elbow pain, often attributed to lateral epicondylitis, presents diagnostic complexities. Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is the most frequent cause of lateral elbow pain, but a differential diagnosis among all the potential causes of lateral elbow pain is not easy.

Purpose: To evaluate the rate of misdiagnoses in patients previously diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis, identify at-risk patient profiles, and determine sensitive clinical tests for a misdiagnosis.

Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted on 189 consecutive patients with a previous diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis and failed nonoperative treatment. According to medical history and a physical examination, patients were preliminarily classified into the typical or atypical lateral epicondylitis group. Atypical epicondylitis was defined as one of the following: atypical lateral pain location, history of trauma, limited range of motion (ROM), elbow swelling, negative Cozen test finding, and physical examination findings suggesting a misdiagnosis. Patients in the atypical group were further investigated for a potential lateral epicondylitis misdiagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and/or analysis of intraoperative samples according to suspected underlying abnormalities. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk of a misdiagnosis. A standardized diagnostic analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical tests used during the physical examination to identify misdiagnosed patients.

Results: A misdiagnosis occurred in 21 of 189 (11%) patients. The most common misdiagnoses were posterolateral elbow instability in 6 patients; radial nerve compression and inflammatory osteoarthritis in 3 patients each; and osteochondritis dissecans, posterolateral plica, and primary osteoarthritis in 2 patients each. The variables associated with a misdiagnosis were young age (≤30 years; odds ratio [OR], 66.90; P < .001), history of trauma (OR, 17.85; P = .0027), history of a limitation of ROM and/or mechanical symptoms (OR, 16.68; P = .0278), history of elbow swelling (OR, 14.32; P = .0032), and number of corticosteroid injections (OR, 2.00; P = .0007). Atypical lateral pain location highly predicted a misdiagnosis, with a sensitivity of 90.5%.

Conclusion: A misdiagnosis can occur in patients affected by longstanding lateral elbow pain. Young patients and patients with a history of elbow trauma, a limitation of ROM, swelling, corticosteroid injections, and atypical lateral pain should be highly suspected for a misdiagnosis.

当外上髁炎不是外上髁炎:外侧肘痛误诊的危险因素分析。
背景:外侧肘疼痛,通常归因于外侧上髁炎,呈现复杂的诊断。外上髁炎,或网球肘,是肘外侧疼痛最常见的原因,但鉴别诊断的所有潜在原因的肘外侧疼痛是不容易的。目的:评估以前诊断为外上髁炎的患者的误诊率,确定高危患者概况,并确定误诊的敏感临床试验。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:对189例既往诊断为外上髁炎且非手术治疗失败的患者进行前瞻性分析。根据病史和体格检查,将患者初步分为典型和非典型外上髁炎组。不典型上髁炎定义为以下情况之一:不典型外侧疼痛位置,创伤史,活动范围有限,肘关节肿胀,Cozen试验阴性,体检结果提示误诊。非典型组患者进一步调查潜在的外上髁炎误诊,使用磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描和/或根据疑似潜在异常对术中样本进行分析。进行单因素和逻辑回归分析以评估误诊的风险。进行标准化诊断分析,以评估在体格检查中用于识别误诊患者的临床试验。结果:189例患者中有21例(11%)出现误诊。6例中最常见的误诊为肘关节后外侧不稳;桡神经压迫合并炎性骨关节炎各3例;夹层性骨软骨炎、后外侧皱襞和原发性骨关节炎各2例。与误诊相关的变量为年轻(≤30岁;优势比[OR], 66.90;P < 0.001),创伤史(OR, 17.85;P = 0.0027), ROM受限史和/或机械症状(or, 16.68;P = 0.0278)、肘关节肿胀史(OR, 14.32;P = 0.0032)、皮质类固醇注射次数(OR, 2.00;P = .0007)。非典型外侧疼痛部位高度预测误诊,敏感性为90.5%。结论:长期肘部外侧疼痛患者容易误诊。年轻患者和有肘部创伤史、活动受限、肿胀、皮质类固醇注射和非典型外侧疼痛的患者应高度怀疑误诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信