Outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament injury with concomitant damage to the medial collateral ligament.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Charles Kajetanek, Etienne Cavaignac, Emilie Bérard, Benjamin Freychet, Alexandre Hardy, Corentin Hercé, Christian Lutz, Thomas Neri, Matthieu Ollivier, Nicolas Bouguennec
{"title":"Outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament injury with concomitant damage to the medial collateral ligament.","authors":"Charles Kajetanek, Etienne Cavaignac, Emilie Bérard, Benjamin Freychet, Alexandre Hardy, Corentin Hercé, Christian Lutz, Thomas Neri, Matthieu Ollivier, Nicolas Bouguennec","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with concomitant damage to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is frequently seen following knee trauma. Non-surgical treatment of the MCL lesion generally results in good internal healing, but surgery may be necessary depending on the location of the lesion, the severity, and the laxity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine outcomes following ACL reconstruction surgery when there is concomitant damage to the MCL compared to isolated ACL lesions, as assessed through a prospective, multi-center cohort study in France.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective, multi-center cohort study, patients who had a primary ACL lesion with or without concomitant damage to the MCL, and who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery were included. Complications related to the surgery were evaluated prospectively (ACL re-rupture, contralateral rupture, reoperation), and functional scores were obtained until the last follow-up (subjective IKDC, Tegner, ACL-RSI, and SKV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 722 patients were included in the study: 314 (43.5%) with an isolated ACL lesion and 408 (56.5%) with a combined ACL + MCL lesion. The ACL + MCL group had a significantly higher reoperation rate than the ACL group (7.4% versus 3.2%, p = 0.015). The ACL + MCL group also had mean IKDC and SKV scores at the last follow-up that were significantly poorer than the ACL group (p < 0.0001). High-grade MCL lesions (grade II or III) were identified in 18.2% of cases, and this was found to be predictive of poorer functional scores at the last follow-up. The mean IKDC score was significantly better when non-surgical MCL treatment was possible (p = 0.005). When MCL surgery was indicated, all of the functional scores were significantly better for ligament reinsertion surgery compared to ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For combined ACL + MCL lesions, the outcomes are poorer, with a higher reoperation rate and lower functional scores. For high-grade MCL lesions, the functional recovery is poorer, particularly when there are chronic lesions that require multi-ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II; prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with concomitant damage to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is frequently seen following knee trauma. Non-surgical treatment of the MCL lesion generally results in good internal healing, but surgery may be necessary depending on the location of the lesion, the severity, and the laxity.

Objectives: To determine outcomes following ACL reconstruction surgery when there is concomitant damage to the MCL compared to isolated ACL lesions, as assessed through a prospective, multi-center cohort study in France.

Materials and methods: In this prospective, multi-center cohort study, patients who had a primary ACL lesion with or without concomitant damage to the MCL, and who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery were included. Complications related to the surgery were evaluated prospectively (ACL re-rupture, contralateral rupture, reoperation), and functional scores were obtained until the last follow-up (subjective IKDC, Tegner, ACL-RSI, and SKV).

Results: A total of 722 patients were included in the study: 314 (43.5%) with an isolated ACL lesion and 408 (56.5%) with a combined ACL + MCL lesion. The ACL + MCL group had a significantly higher reoperation rate than the ACL group (7.4% versus 3.2%, p = 0.015). The ACL + MCL group also had mean IKDC and SKV scores at the last follow-up that were significantly poorer than the ACL group (p < 0.0001). High-grade MCL lesions (grade II or III) were identified in 18.2% of cases, and this was found to be predictive of poorer functional scores at the last follow-up. The mean IKDC score was significantly better when non-surgical MCL treatment was possible (p = 0.005). When MCL surgery was indicated, all of the functional scores were significantly better for ligament reinsertion surgery compared to ligament reconstruction.

Conclusion: For combined ACL + MCL lesions, the outcomes are poorer, with a higher reoperation rate and lower functional scores. For high-grade MCL lesions, the functional recovery is poorer, particularly when there are chronic lesions that require multi-ligament reconstruction.

Level of evidence: II; prospective cohort study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信