From Theory to Practice: The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Medical Students' Communication Skills.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Perspectives on Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/pme.1595
Elda Maria Stafuzza Gonçalves Pires, Stephanie N E Meeuwissen, Hans H C M Savelberg
{"title":"From Theory to Practice: The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Medical Students' Communication Skills.","authors":"Elda Maria Stafuzza Gonçalves Pires, Stephanie N E Meeuwissen, Hans H C M Savelberg","doi":"10.5334/pme.1595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developing communication skills is essential for medical students to work in modern medical practice. A collaborative learning environment, such as Team-Based Learning (TBL), is a promising environment for developing communication skills. In this study, we investigated 1) how medical students self-report their communication skills in a TBL environment and 2) to what extent students perceive a TBL environment as contributing to their communication skills development.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a quantitative study with a qualitative element involving Brazilian undergraduate medical students from one Medical School. Participants completed the Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale and the Team-Based Learning Environment Scale, including an open-ended question. We used ANOVA to compare responses across the seven semesters and thematic analysis for the open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 416 students invited, 307 (74%) responded to both scales. Students had high scores on communication skills. Students highly valued the contribution of five domains of the TBL learning environment: teachers' decisions, teachers' attitudes, students' characteristics, team characteristics, and contextual factors. The sixth domain, formative assessment, was highly valued by first-year students with a downward trend across semesters. Key factors contributing to communication skills development were teachers' alignment with the educational methodology and students' attitudes within teams. Additionally, students noted that their perception of safety and trust to provide feedback influenced their communication skills development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that a TBL environment can maintain students' communication skills. Various elements of the TBL environment play a role here, particularly teachers' alignment, students' attitudes, and a supportive classroom atmosphere.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Developing communication skills is essential for medical students to work in modern medical practice. A collaborative learning environment, such as Team-Based Learning (TBL), is a promising environment for developing communication skills. In this study, we investigated 1) how medical students self-report their communication skills in a TBL environment and 2) to what extent students perceive a TBL environment as contributing to their communication skills development.

Method: We conducted a quantitative study with a qualitative element involving Brazilian undergraduate medical students from one Medical School. Participants completed the Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale and the Team-Based Learning Environment Scale, including an open-ended question. We used ANOVA to compare responses across the seven semesters and thematic analysis for the open-ended responses.

Results: Of the 416 students invited, 307 (74%) responded to both scales. Students had high scores on communication skills. Students highly valued the contribution of five domains of the TBL learning environment: teachers' decisions, teachers' attitudes, students' characteristics, team characteristics, and contextual factors. The sixth domain, formative assessment, was highly valued by first-year students with a downward trend across semesters. Key factors contributing to communication skills development were teachers' alignment with the educational methodology and students' attitudes within teams. Additionally, students noted that their perception of safety and trust to provide feedback influenced their communication skills development.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that a TBL environment can maintain students' communication skills. Various elements of the TBL environment play a role here, particularly teachers' alignment, students' attitudes, and a supportive classroom atmosphere.

从理论到实践:团队学习对医学生沟通技巧的影响。
在现代医学实践中,培养医学生的沟通能力是必不可少的。协作学习环境,例如基于团队的学习(Team-Based learning, TBL),是培养沟通技能的良好环境。在本研究中,我们调查了医学生在TBL环境中如何自我报告他们的沟通技巧,以及学生在多大程度上认为TBL环境有助于他们的沟通技巧发展。方法:我们对一所巴西医学院的本科生进行了定量研究,并结合定性因素。参与者完成了人际沟通能力量表和团队学习环境量表,其中包括一个开放式问题。我们使用方差分析来比较七个学期的回答,并对开放式回答进行主题分析。结果:在被邀请的416名学生中,307人(74%)对两个量表都有反应。学生们在沟通技巧上得分很高。学生高度评价TBL学习环境的五个领域:教师决策、教师态度、学生特征、团队特征和情境因素。第六个领域,形成性评估,受到一年级学生的高度重视,在整个学期中呈下降趋势。促进沟通技巧发展的关键因素是教师与教育方法的一致性和学生在团队中的态度。此外,学生注意到他们对提供反馈的安全感和信任感影响了他们的沟通技巧发展。结论:TBL环境可以维持学生的沟通能力。TBL环境的各种因素在这里发挥了作用,特别是教师的一致性、学生的态度和支持性的课堂氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO). Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission. Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary. The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members. The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief. Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信