Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 1 - A scoping review of healing and non-healing definitions.

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43715
H Williams-Reid, A Johannesson, A Buis
{"title":"Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 1 - A scoping review of healing and non-healing definitions.","authors":"H Williams-Reid, A Johannesson, A Buis","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following lower limb amputation, timely prosthetic fitting enhances mobility and quality of life. However, inconsistent definitions of surgical site healing complicate prosthesis readiness assessment and highlight the need for objective wound management measures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to compile definitions of healing and non-healing provided in the literature investigating biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using \"biomarkers,\" \"wound healing,\" and \"amputation\" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 3,306 articles screened, 219 met the inclusion criteria and are reviewed in this article, with 77% rated strong quality. 43% of all included sources did not define healing, while the remainder used specific criteria including epithelialization (14%), wound size reduction (28%), gradings scales (3%), scarring (1%), absence of wound complications (2%), hydroxyproline levels (0.5%), no amputation (0.5%), or neovascularization (0.5%). 84% of included sources did not provide definitions of non-healing. Studies defining non-healing used criteria like wound complications (4%), the need for operative interventions (4%), or lack of wound size reduction (1%). For 10% of included sources, healing and non-healing definitions were considered not applicable given the research content. Total percentages exceed 100% for both healing and non-healing definitions because some sources used two definition classifications, such as epithelialization and wound size reduction. The findings indicate a lack of standardized definitions irrespective of study type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review reveals significant gaps in current definitions of healing and non-healing, often based on superficial assessments that overlook deeper tissue healing and mechanical properties essential for prosthesis use. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive definitions incorporating biomarkers and psychosocial factors to improve wound management and post-amputation recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"43715"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.43715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following lower limb amputation, timely prosthetic fitting enhances mobility and quality of life. However, inconsistent definitions of surgical site healing complicate prosthesis readiness assessment and highlight the need for objective wound management measures.

Objective: This review aimed to compile definitions of healing and non-healing provided in the literature investigating biomarkers of healing of the tissues and structures found in the residual limbs of adults with amputation.

Methodology: A scoping review was conducted following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Searches using "biomarkers," "wound healing," and "amputation" were performed on May 6, 2023, on Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: 1) References to biomarkers and healing; 2) Residuum tissue healing; 3) Clear methodology with ethical approval; 4) Published from 2017 onwards. Articles were assessed for quality (QualSyst tool) and evidence level (JBI system).

Findings: Of 3,306 articles screened, 219 met the inclusion criteria and are reviewed in this article, with 77% rated strong quality. 43% of all included sources did not define healing, while the remainder used specific criteria including epithelialization (14%), wound size reduction (28%), gradings scales (3%), scarring (1%), absence of wound complications (2%), hydroxyproline levels (0.5%), no amputation (0.5%), or neovascularization (0.5%). 84% of included sources did not provide definitions of non-healing. Studies defining non-healing used criteria like wound complications (4%), the need for operative interventions (4%), or lack of wound size reduction (1%). For 10% of included sources, healing and non-healing definitions were considered not applicable given the research content. Total percentages exceed 100% for both healing and non-healing definitions because some sources used two definition classifications, such as epithelialization and wound size reduction. The findings indicate a lack of standardized definitions irrespective of study type.

Conclusion: This review reveals significant gaps in current definitions of healing and non-healing, often based on superficial assessments that overlook deeper tissue healing and mechanical properties essential for prosthesis use. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive definitions incorporating biomarkers and psychosocial factors to improve wound management and post-amputation recovery.

伤口管理,愈合和早期假肢康复:第1部分-愈合和非愈合定义的范围审查。
背景:下肢截肢后,及时安装假肢可提高活动能力和生活质量。然而,手术部位愈合的不一致定义使假体准备评估复杂化,并强调需要客观的伤口管理措施。目的:本综述旨在整理研究成人截肢残肢组织和结构愈合的生物标志物的文献中提供的愈合和不愈合的定义。方法:根据JBI和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查。使用“生物标志物”、“伤口愈合”和“截肢”于2023年5月6日在Web of Science、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Scopus、Cochrane、PubMed和CINAHL数据库上进行搜索。纳入标准为:1)参考生物标志物和愈合;2)残余组织愈合;3)方法明确,伦理认可;4) 2017年以后出版。对文章的质量(QualSyst工具)和证据水平(JBI系统)进行评估。结果:在筛选的3306篇文献中,219篇符合纳入标准,本文对其进行了回顾,其中77%评价为高质量。所有纳入的来源中有43%没有定义愈合,而其余的则使用特定的标准,包括上皮化(14%)、伤口大小缩小(28%)、分级量表(3%)、瘢痕形成(1%)、伤口无并发症(2%)、羟脯氨酸水平(0.5%)、未截肢(0.5%)或新生血管(0.5%)。84%的纳入文献没有提供不愈合的定义。研究使用诸如伤口并发症(4%)、需要手术干预(4%)或伤口大小未缩小(1%)等标准来定义未愈合。对于10%的纳入来源,考虑到研究内容,治疗和非治疗的定义被认为不适用。愈合和非愈合定义的总百分比超过100%,因为一些来源使用了两种定义分类,如上皮化和伤口大小缩小。研究结果表明,无论研究类型如何,都缺乏标准化的定义。结论:这篇综述揭示了目前愈合和非愈合定义的重大差距,通常基于肤浅的评估,忽视了假体使用所必需的深层组织愈合和机械特性。它强调需要综合定义纳入生物标志物和社会心理因素,以改善伤口管理和截肢后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信