Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector.

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450
B Theron, S Visagie
{"title":"Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector.","authors":"B Theron, S Visagie","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen's Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Across cases, the \"Scope and Purpose\" domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). \"Editorial Independence\" scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were \"Applicability\" (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and \"Rigour of Development\" (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: \"Guideline Availability and Necessity\" showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; \"Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline\" indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and \"Guideline Development Requirements\" explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"44450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector.

Objective: To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector.

Methodology: Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen's Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data.

Findings: Across cases, the "Scope and Purpose" domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). "Editorial Independence" scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were "Applicability" (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and "Rigour of Development" (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: "Guideline Availability and Necessity" showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; "Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline" indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and "Guideline Development Requirements" explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development.

Conclusion: Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信