Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector.

Q3 Medicine
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450
B Theron, S Visagie
{"title":"Exploring the need for lower limb prosthetic guidelines in South Africa's private healthcare sector.","authors":"B Theron, S Visagie","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen's Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Across cases, the \"Scope and Purpose\" domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). \"Editorial Independence\" scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were \"Applicability\" (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and \"Rigour of Development\" (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: \"Guideline Availability and Necessity\" showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; \"Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline\" indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and \"Guideline Development Requirements\" explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"44450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence based guidelines can assist with prosthetic component selection and clinical intervention. There is limited evidence on lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private health care sector.

Objective: To explore the need for lower limb prosthetic prescription guidelines in the South African private healthcare sector.

Methodology: Three main funders of lower limb prosthetics in the South African private healthcare sector (Road Accident Fund (RAF), Workmen's Compensation Fund (WCA), and Council of Medical Schemes (CMS)) were explored using a case study design. Data were collected from six regulatory documents, sixteen purposively sampled prosthetic users, who received services from these funders, and seven key informants. Documents were assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), across six domains. Data from users and key informants were collected with telephonic, semi-structured interviews guided by interview schedules. Interview schedules were self-developed and tailored for each participant group. AGREE II data were analyzed descriptively. Inductive thematic analysis was used for interview data.

Findings: Across cases, the "Scope and Purpose" domain scored the highest: 50% (WCA), 47% (CMS), and 22% (RAF). "Editorial Independence" scored 0% for all three cases. Other challenging domains were "Applicability" (WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%) and "Rigour of Development" (WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%). The following three cross-case themes emerged from the interviews: "Guideline Availability and Necessity" showed that guidelines were seldom used and that guidelines could be beneficial; "Purpose of a Lower Limb Prosthetic Guideline" indicated that guidelines can support accessible, equitable, ethical, and transparent services; and "Guideline Development Requirements" explained that an evidence based collaborative process, facilitated by an independent body should underscore guideline development.

Conclusion: Evidence based, standardized, transparent guidelines will be beneficial to direct prosthetic service delivery in the South African private healthcare sector. The guidelines must be applicable, rigorously developed, and show editorial independence.

探索南非私人医疗保健部门对下肢假肢指南的需求。
背景:基于证据的指南可以帮助假肢部件的选择和临床干预。在南非私人卫生保健部门,下肢假肢处方指南的证据有限。目的:探讨南非私营医疗保健部门对下肢假肢处方指南的需求。方法:使用案例研究设计探讨了南非私营医疗保健部门下肢假肢的三个主要资助者(道路事故基金(RAF)、工人赔偿基金(WCA)和医疗计划委员会(CMS))。数据收集自6个规范性文件,16个有目的抽样的义肢使用者,他们从这些资助者那里得到服务,以及7个关键举报人。通过研究与评估指南II (AGREE II)评估了六个领域的文件。通过电话半结构化访谈收集用户和主要举报人的数据。面试时间表是自行制定的,并为每个参与者群体量身定制。对AGREE II数据进行描述性分析。访谈资料采用归纳专题分析。结果:在所有案例中,“范围和目的”领域得分最高:50% (WCA), 47% (CMS)和22% (RAF)。在这三种情况下,“编辑独立性”得分均为0%。其他具有挑战性的领域是“适用性”(WCA: 17%, CMS: 6%, RAF: 6%)和“开发的严谨性”(WCA: 8%, CMS: 25%, RAF: 0%)。访谈中出现了以下三个跨案例主题:“指南的可用性和必要性”表明指南很少被使用,指南可能是有益的;《下肢假肢指南的目的》指出,指南可以支持无障碍、公平、合乎道德和透明的服务;和《指南制定要求》解释说,由一个独立机构推动的基于证据的协作过程应该强调指南的制定。结论:以证据为基础的、标准化的、透明的指导方针将有利于南非私营医疗保健部门直接提供假肢服务。这些指导方针必须是适用的,严格制定的,并显示编辑的独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信