Oxygen Saturation Sub-analyses Errors in the Dominant Meta-analysis Used to Deimplement Albuterol as a Therapeutic Option for Bronchiolitis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003352
Larry Mellick, Gabriella Weston, Paul Walsh, Shane McKinney, Hongyan Xu
{"title":"Oxygen Saturation Sub-analyses Errors in the Dominant Meta-analysis Used to Deimplement Albuterol as a Therapeutic Option for Bronchiolitis.","authors":"Larry Mellick, Gabriella Weston, Paul Walsh, Shane McKinney, Hongyan Xu","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical experience and patient-level physiological studies indicate that albuterol transiently reduces oxygen saturation, irrespective of the underlying respiratory condition causing the wheezing. Three revisions of the Cochrane review, Bronchodilators for Bronchiolitis (Review), have found that albuterol temporarily increases oxygen saturation. Rarely, these findings were even statistically significant, but the direction of effect is consistently opposite from physiological studies. In this study, we attempted to resolve this apparent paradox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original trial publications included in multiple oxygen saturation sub-analyses in the 2006, 2010, and 2014 updates of the Cochrane review were assessed for appropriate study inclusion, correctness of calculations, and correct analysis with respect to direction of effect. The studies were also reviewed to assess whether the data was correctly transferred to the meta-analysis software. We repeated the meta-analyses calculations after correcting for suspected errors and plotted the results of the meta-analyses as originally reported and in their corrected form on an albatross plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found data miscalculations, errors of transposition of albuterol and placebo data, the inclusion of inpatient data in outpatient analyses, and questionable study inclusions in the 3 Cochrane review updates. After corrections were made, the direction of effect of albuterol switched negative, albeit nonsignificantly, a finding most consistent with clinical and physiological observations. In addition, the very wide heterogeneity between the original meta-analyses disappeared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After multiple suspected data flaws were corrected our reanalyses of the reported data confirmed that decreased oxygen saturation can be expected following administration of albuterol to infants presenting with bronchiolitis syndrome, thereby resolving the apparent paradox in favor of clinical observation and research physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"423-428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinical experience and patient-level physiological studies indicate that albuterol transiently reduces oxygen saturation, irrespective of the underlying respiratory condition causing the wheezing. Three revisions of the Cochrane review, Bronchodilators for Bronchiolitis (Review), have found that albuterol temporarily increases oxygen saturation. Rarely, these findings were even statistically significant, but the direction of effect is consistently opposite from physiological studies. In this study, we attempted to resolve this apparent paradox.

Methods: The original trial publications included in multiple oxygen saturation sub-analyses in the 2006, 2010, and 2014 updates of the Cochrane review were assessed for appropriate study inclusion, correctness of calculations, and correct analysis with respect to direction of effect. The studies were also reviewed to assess whether the data was correctly transferred to the meta-analysis software. We repeated the meta-analyses calculations after correcting for suspected errors and plotted the results of the meta-analyses as originally reported and in their corrected form on an albatross plot.

Results: We found data miscalculations, errors of transposition of albuterol and placebo data, the inclusion of inpatient data in outpatient analyses, and questionable study inclusions in the 3 Cochrane review updates. After corrections were made, the direction of effect of albuterol switched negative, albeit nonsignificantly, a finding most consistent with clinical and physiological observations. In addition, the very wide heterogeneity between the original meta-analyses disappeared.

Conclusion: After multiple suspected data flaws were corrected our reanalyses of the reported data confirmed that decreased oxygen saturation can be expected following administration of albuterol to infants presenting with bronchiolitis syndrome, thereby resolving the apparent paradox in favor of clinical observation and research physiology.

用于取消沙丁胺醇作为毛细支气管炎治疗选择的优势荟萃分析中的氧饱和度亚分析错误。
目的:临床经验和患者水平的生理研究表明,沙丁胺醇可短暂降低氧饱和度,而与引起喘息的潜在呼吸条件无关。对Cochrane综述《细支气管炎支气管扩张剂》(综述)的三次修订发现沙丁胺醇可暂时提高血氧饱和度。这些发现甚至很少有统计学意义,但效果的方向始终与生理学研究相反。在这项研究中,我们试图解决这个明显的悖论。方法:对Cochrane综述2006年、2010年和2014年更新的多个血氧饱和度亚分析中纳入的原始试验出版物进行评估,以确定纳入研究的适宜性、计算的正确性以及效应方向分析的正确性。还对研究进行了回顾,以评估数据是否正确地转移到元分析软件中。在修正了可疑的错误后,我们重复了meta分析的计算,并在信天翁图上绘制了原始报告和修正后的meta分析结果。结果:我们发现数据计算错误,沙丁胺醇和安慰剂数据调换错误,门诊分析中纳入住院患者数据,3篇Cochrane综述更新中纳入可疑的研究。修正后,沙丁胺醇的作用方向变为阴性,尽管不显著,这一发现与临床和生理观察最一致。此外,原始荟萃分析之间的广泛异质性消失了。结论:在纠正了多个可疑的数据缺陷后,我们对报告数据的重新分析证实,对患有毛细支气管炎综合征的婴儿给予沙丁胺醇后,可以预期血氧饱和度降低,从而解决了明显的矛盾,有利于临床观察和研究生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信