Oxygen Saturation Sub-analyses Errors in the Dominant Meta-analysis Used to Deimplement Albuterol as a Therapeutic Option for Bronchiolitis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Larry Mellick, Gabriella Weston, Paul Walsh, Shane McKinney, Hongyan Xu
{"title":"Oxygen Saturation Sub-analyses Errors in the Dominant Meta-analysis Used to Deimplement Albuterol as a Therapeutic Option for Bronchiolitis.","authors":"Larry Mellick, Gabriella Weston, Paul Walsh, Shane McKinney, Hongyan Xu","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical experience and patient-level physiological studies indicate that albuterol transiently reduces oxygen saturation, irrespective of the underlying respiratory condition causing the wheezing. Three revisions of the Cochrane review, Bronchodilators for Bronchiolitis (Review), have found that albuterol temporarily increases oxygen saturation. Rarely, these findings were even statistically significant, but the direction of effect is consistently opposite from physiological studies. In this study, we attempted to resolve this apparent paradox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original trial publications included in multiple oxygen saturation sub-analyses in the 2006, 2010, and 2014 updates of the Cochrane review were assessed for appropriate study inclusion, correctness of calculations, and correct analysis with respect to direction of effect. The studies were also reviewed to assess whether the data was correctly transferred to the meta-analysis software. We repeated the meta-analyses calculations after correcting for suspected errors and plotted the results of the meta-analyses as originally reported and in their corrected form on an albatross plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found data miscalculations, errors of transposition of albuterol and placebo data, the inclusion of inpatient data in outpatient analyses, and questionable study inclusions in the 3 Cochrane review updates. After corrections were made, the direction of effect of albuterol switched negative, albeit nonsignificantly, a finding most consistent with clinical and physiological observations. In addition, the very wide heterogeneity between the original meta-analyses disappeared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After multiple suspected data flaws were corrected our reanalyses of the reported data confirmed that decreased oxygen saturation can be expected following administration of albuterol to infants presenting with bronchiolitis syndrome, thereby resolving the apparent paradox in favor of clinical observation and research physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinical experience and patient-level physiological studies indicate that albuterol transiently reduces oxygen saturation, irrespective of the underlying respiratory condition causing the wheezing. Three revisions of the Cochrane review, Bronchodilators for Bronchiolitis (Review), have found that albuterol temporarily increases oxygen saturation. Rarely, these findings were even statistically significant, but the direction of effect is consistently opposite from physiological studies. In this study, we attempted to resolve this apparent paradox.

Methods: The original trial publications included in multiple oxygen saturation sub-analyses in the 2006, 2010, and 2014 updates of the Cochrane review were assessed for appropriate study inclusion, correctness of calculations, and correct analysis with respect to direction of effect. The studies were also reviewed to assess whether the data was correctly transferred to the meta-analysis software. We repeated the meta-analyses calculations after correcting for suspected errors and plotted the results of the meta-analyses as originally reported and in their corrected form on an albatross plot.

Results: We found data miscalculations, errors of transposition of albuterol and placebo data, the inclusion of inpatient data in outpatient analyses, and questionable study inclusions in the 3 Cochrane review updates. After corrections were made, the direction of effect of albuterol switched negative, albeit nonsignificantly, a finding most consistent with clinical and physiological observations. In addition, the very wide heterogeneity between the original meta-analyses disappeared.

Conclusion: After multiple suspected data flaws were corrected our reanalyses of the reported data confirmed that decreased oxygen saturation can be expected following administration of albuterol to infants presenting with bronchiolitis syndrome, thereby resolving the apparent paradox in favor of clinical observation and research physiology.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信