{"title":"Lasmiditan and Different Triptans in Menstrual Migraine: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhaoming Song, Yanao Guo, Jingyu Gu, Chen Yang, Ruisi Qu, Jian Li, Zhouqing Chen, Zhong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00705-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menstrual migraine (MM) is a common subtype of migraine that greatly affects a woman's quality of life. A number of different drugs are used to treat menstrual migraine, but it is not known which is more effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we searched all randomized controlled trials that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria up to December 2023 on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library using a suitable search strategy. We constructed a suitable network model for analysis after evaluating the heterogeneity among the included direct, indirect and pooled evidence. Odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as valid indicators for this network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Bayesian network model we constructed, we found that lasmiditan (vs. placebo OR, 14; 95% CI 3.1-100) was better than rizatriptan (vs. placebo OR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) in terms of the rate of sustained freedom from pain. There was no statistically significant difference between lasmiditan and different triptans in terms of the rate of being pain-free at 2 h (2-h pain-free) and the rate of pain relief at 2 h (2-h pain relief). Regarding safety, the probability of adverse events was significantly higher for rizatriptan (OR, 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-7.3) than for placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In terms of treatment efficacy for MM, lasmiditan was not worse than different triptans and was even better than some of the triptans in the rate of sustained freedom from pain. As an emerging treatment, lasmiditan is promising for the treatment of MM. However, more research needs to be carried out because of the lack of safety analysis for lasmiditan.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"639-653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-025-00705-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Menstrual migraine (MM) is a common subtype of migraine that greatly affects a woman's quality of life. A number of different drugs are used to treat menstrual migraine, but it is not known which is more effective.
Methods: In this study, we searched all randomized controlled trials that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria up to December 2023 on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library using a suitable search strategy. We constructed a suitable network model for analysis after evaluating the heterogeneity among the included direct, indirect and pooled evidence. Odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as valid indicators for this network meta-analysis.
Results: In the Bayesian network model we constructed, we found that lasmiditan (vs. placebo OR, 14; 95% CI 3.1-100) was better than rizatriptan (vs. placebo OR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) in terms of the rate of sustained freedom from pain. There was no statistically significant difference between lasmiditan and different triptans in terms of the rate of being pain-free at 2 h (2-h pain-free) and the rate of pain relief at 2 h (2-h pain relief). Regarding safety, the probability of adverse events was significantly higher for rizatriptan (OR, 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-7.3) than for placebo.
Conclusion: In terms of treatment efficacy for MM, lasmiditan was not worse than different triptans and was even better than some of the triptans in the rate of sustained freedom from pain. As an emerging treatment, lasmiditan is promising for the treatment of MM. However, more research needs to be carried out because of the lack of safety analysis for lasmiditan.
期刊介绍：
Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
