Explaining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Advance Care Planning: A Decomposition Analysis

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yifan Lou PhD, LMSW , Emma Zang PhD , Qianqian Li MPH
{"title":"Explaining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Advance Care Planning: A Decomposition Analysis","authors":"Yifan Lou PhD, LMSW ,&nbsp;Emma Zang PhD ,&nbsp;Qianqian Li MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The study quantifies the relative significance of a range of demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), health care service and access, health, and psychological factors in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in advance care planning (ACP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our sample included 8416 White, Black, or Hispanic adults aged 65 or older, using the 2020 Health and Retirement Study. We applied Gelbach's decomposition method to understand the relative contribution of 37 factors in explaining White-Black and White-Hispanic disparities in ACP discussion and advance directives (AD) completion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ACP disparities between White and Hispanic populations were nearly twice as large as the disparity between White and Black populations. Decomposition analyses reveal that the 37 factors collectively explained approximately 65% of the White-Hispanic ACP gaps and 37.5% and 57.1% of the Black-White gaps in ACP discussions and AD completion, respectively. Notably, demographic, SES, and health care service and access factors played substantial roles in these disparities, while health factors did not emerge as significant contributors. Education was the most important contributor across all four tested gaps. Perceptions on how often wishes were respected in healthcare uniquely accounted for 10% of the explained White-Black disparities in ACP discussions. Immigration status and living arrangements were significant contributors to explained White-Hispanic disparities but not to White-Black differences.</div></div><div><h3>Discussions</h3><div>Interventions targeting less educated older Black and Hispanic individuals should be prioritized to narrow the ACP disparity. Negative healthcare experiences in previous care and household dynamics should be addressed while working with Black and Hispanic older adults, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 5","pages":"Pages 527-535.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425000739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study quantifies the relative significance of a range of demographic, socioeconomic status (SES), health care service and access, health, and psychological factors in explaining racial and ethnic disparities in advance care planning (ACP).

Methods

Our sample included 8416 White, Black, or Hispanic adults aged 65 or older, using the 2020 Health and Retirement Study. We applied Gelbach's decomposition method to understand the relative contribution of 37 factors in explaining White-Black and White-Hispanic disparities in ACP discussion and advance directives (AD) completion.

Results

The ACP disparities between White and Hispanic populations were nearly twice as large as the disparity between White and Black populations. Decomposition analyses reveal that the 37 factors collectively explained approximately 65% of the White-Hispanic ACP gaps and 37.5% and 57.1% of the Black-White gaps in ACP discussions and AD completion, respectively. Notably, demographic, SES, and health care service and access factors played substantial roles in these disparities, while health factors did not emerge as significant contributors. Education was the most important contributor across all four tested gaps. Perceptions on how often wishes were respected in healthcare uniquely accounted for 10% of the explained White-Black disparities in ACP discussions. Immigration status and living arrangements were significant contributors to explained White-Hispanic disparities but not to White-Black differences.

Discussions

Interventions targeting less educated older Black and Hispanic individuals should be prioritized to narrow the ACP disparity. Negative healthcare experiences in previous care and household dynamics should be addressed while working with Black and Hispanic older adults, respectively.
解释预先护理规划中的种族和民族差异:分解分析》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信