Exploring surface-guided systems for intelligent breathing-adapted four-dimensional computed tomography: A comparison to infrared-based reflective marker systems.
IF 2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Niklas Lackner, Andre Karius, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Juliane Szkitsak
{"title":"Exploring surface-guided systems for intelligent breathing-adapted four-dimensional computed tomography: A comparison to infrared-based reflective marker systems.","authors":"Niklas Lackner, Andre Karius, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Juliane Szkitsak","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the technical feasibility of adapting a surface monitoring system, designed for conventional four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), to an intelligent, breathing-adapted 4DCT and examines its potential to expand the currently limited range of supported surrogate systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an experimental phantom setting, we compared breathing curve quality and its impact on breathing-adapted 4DCT generation between a surface monitoring camera and our clinical infrared (IR) system, using a research-grade IR camera coupled with a radiation detector as an independent reference. Breathing curves from the surface monitoring system and the research-grade camera were corrected for table motion. We assessed the influence of differences in breathing curves on the automatic selection of parameters before scanning, intelligent X-ray triggering during acquisition, and the differences of binning point selection for reconstruction as well as image quality. Additionally, we simulated the impact of latency on image quality and measured the observed latencies between the surrogate systems relative to an X-ray measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During table movement, discrepancies were found in breathing signals from the surface monitoring system compared to the clinical and reference systems. After correcting for table motion, the surface monitoring system's curves aligned consistently with those of the other systems with amplitude (AMP) variations of less than 10% and breathing rate (BR) variations of less than 1%. Corrected curves showed improved performance in their ability to generate breathing-adapted 4DCTs. The clinical IR system showed a 45 ms latency advantage over the surface monitoring system, impacting image quality as simulated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After correcting surface monitoring breathing curves, satisfactory agreement with the clinical and independent reference systems was achieved. With modifications, the surface monitor solution could serve as a suitable surrogate for breathing-adapted 4DCT. In our experimental setting, the surface monitoring system had a 45 ms delay relative to the clinical system, potentially affecting image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the technical feasibility of adapting a surface monitoring system, designed for conventional four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), to an intelligent, breathing-adapted 4DCT and examines its potential to expand the currently limited range of supported surrogate systems.
Methods: In an experimental phantom setting, we compared breathing curve quality and its impact on breathing-adapted 4DCT generation between a surface monitoring camera and our clinical infrared (IR) system, using a research-grade IR camera coupled with a radiation detector as an independent reference. Breathing curves from the surface monitoring system and the research-grade camera were corrected for table motion. We assessed the influence of differences in breathing curves on the automatic selection of parameters before scanning, intelligent X-ray triggering during acquisition, and the differences of binning point selection for reconstruction as well as image quality. Additionally, we simulated the impact of latency on image quality and measured the observed latencies between the surrogate systems relative to an X-ray measurement.
Results: During table movement, discrepancies were found in breathing signals from the surface monitoring system compared to the clinical and reference systems. After correcting for table motion, the surface monitoring system's curves aligned consistently with those of the other systems with amplitude (AMP) variations of less than 10% and breathing rate (BR) variations of less than 1%. Corrected curves showed improved performance in their ability to generate breathing-adapted 4DCTs. The clinical IR system showed a 45 ms latency advantage over the surface monitoring system, impacting image quality as simulated.
Conclusions: After correcting surface monitoring breathing curves, satisfactory agreement with the clinical and independent reference systems was achieved. With modifications, the surface monitor solution could serve as a suitable surrogate for breathing-adapted 4DCT. In our experimental setting, the surface monitoring system had a 45 ms delay relative to the clinical system, potentially affecting image quality.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic