Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii
{"title":"Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.","authors":"Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pathological complete response has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant trials in early stage triple-negative breast cancer, and the Food and Drug Administration accepted pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes in high-risk early stage breast cancer for new drug approval. However, there is insufficient trial-level data to robustly support pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized clinical trials of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for patients with clinical stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer. Data of odds ratios (ORs) for pathological complete response and hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival and overall survival were extracted. Disease-free survival was used as an alternative when event-free survival data were unavailable. A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale, coefficient of difference, and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to assess the trial-level association between odds ratio for pathological complete response and hazard ratio for overall survival and event-free survival.
Results: Eight trials with 2342 patients were included. Three trials tested immune checkpoint inhibitors. Coefficient of difference (R2) was 0.2 for hazard ratio of event-free survival (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .27), and R2 for hazard ratio of overall survival was 0.19 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.22, P = .33).
Conclusions: There is no strong evidence to support using pathological complete response as a surrogate marker for event-free survival or overall survival in early stage triple-negative breast cancer at the trial level. Because of the necessity of minimizing drug approval delay with reliable long-term outcome, further studies of surrogate markers in early stage triple-negative breast cancer are warranted.