Outcomes of Melflufen Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Shahrier Hossain, Clifton Mo, Sarah Patches, Houry Leblebjian, Kathryn Goodrich, Eileen Regan, Kathleen O'Neill, Kim Noonan, Paul G. Richardson, Jacob Laubach
{"title":"Outcomes of Melflufen Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma","authors":"Shahrier Hossain,&nbsp;Clifton Mo,&nbsp;Sarah Patches,&nbsp;Houry Leblebjian,&nbsp;Kathryn Goodrich,&nbsp;Eileen Regan,&nbsp;Kathleen O'Neill,&nbsp;Kim Noonan,&nbsp;Paul G. Richardson,&nbsp;Jacob Laubach","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone is fully approved in Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of melflufen in the real-world setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective analysis, we examined baseline features, efficacy, and safety outcomes with melflufen plus dexamethasone in a cohort of 12 patients with heavily pre-treated RRMM at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients had received a median of 5.5 prior lines of therapy. Three patients (25%) had extramedullary disease, three (25%) cytogenetically high-risk features, and five (42%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 55% (complete response: three [27%], very good partial response: one [9%], partial response: two [18%] patients). Five patients (42%) had stable disease; one was non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly hematologic and proved manageable; two patients had Grade 2 infections. Reasons for melflufen discontinuation were progressive disease (42%), drug withdrawal from the United States market (33%), AEs (17%), and sudden death (8%) unrelated to treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent with clinical trial data, melflufen had an expected safety profile with manageable toxicity and clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with RRMM treated in the real-world setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":"114 6","pages":"982-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejh.14398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.14398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone is fully approved in Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of melflufen in the real-world setting.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, we examined baseline features, efficacy, and safety outcomes with melflufen plus dexamethasone in a cohort of 12 patients with heavily pre-treated RRMM at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA.

Results

Patients had received a median of 5.5 prior lines of therapy. Three patients (25%) had extramedullary disease, three (25%) cytogenetically high-risk features, and five (42%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 55% (complete response: three [27%], very good partial response: one [9%], partial response: two [18%] patients). Five patients (42%) had stable disease; one was non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly hematologic and proved manageable; two patients had Grade 2 infections. Reasons for melflufen discontinuation were progressive disease (42%), drug withdrawal from the United States market (33%), AEs (17%), and sudden death (8%) unrelated to treatment.

Conclusions

Consistent with clinical trial data, melflufen had an expected safety profile with manageable toxicity and clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with RRMM treated in the real-world setting.

美氟芬治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效
目的:Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) +地塞米松在欧洲被完全批准用于既往治疗≥3条线的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者。我们分析了melflufen在现实世界中的有效性和安全性。方法:在这项回顾性分析中,我们对美国丹娜-法伯癌症研究所的12例重度预治疗的RRMM患者进行了melflufen +地塞米松的基线特征、疗效和安全性分析。结果:患者先前接受的治疗中位数为5.5行。3名患者(25%)患有髓外疾病,3名患者(25%)具有细胞遗传学高危特征,5名患者(42%)先前接受过自体干细胞移植。总有效率为55%(完全缓解:3例[27%],非常好的部分缓解:1例[9%],部分缓解:2例[18%])。5例(42%)病情稳定;一个是不可评估的。不良事件(ae)主要是血液学的,并被证明是可控的;2例患者为2级感染。美氟芬停药的原因是疾病进展(42%)、美国市场停药(33%)、不良反应(17%)和与治疗无关的猝死(8%)。结论:与临床试验数据一致,在现实环境中治疗的RRMM患者中,melflufen具有预期的安全性、可控的毒性和具有临床意义的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信