Shahrier Hossain, Clifton Mo, Sarah Patches, Houry Leblebjian, Kathryn Goodrich, Eileen Regan, Kathleen O'Neill, Kim Noonan, Paul G. Richardson, Jacob Laubach
{"title":"Outcomes of Melflufen Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma","authors":"Shahrier Hossain, Clifton Mo, Sarah Patches, Houry Leblebjian, Kathryn Goodrich, Eileen Regan, Kathleen O'Neill, Kim Noonan, Paul G. Richardson, Jacob Laubach","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone is fully approved in Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of melflufen in the real-world setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective analysis, we examined baseline features, efficacy, and safety outcomes with melflufen plus dexamethasone in a cohort of 12 patients with heavily pre-treated RRMM at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients had received a median of 5.5 prior lines of therapy. Three patients (25%) had extramedullary disease, three (25%) cytogenetically high-risk features, and five (42%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 55% (complete response: three [27%], very good partial response: one [9%], partial response: two [18%] patients). Five patients (42%) had stable disease; one was non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly hematologic and proved manageable; two patients had Grade 2 infections. Reasons for melflufen discontinuation were progressive disease (42%), drug withdrawal from the United States market (33%), AEs (17%), and sudden death (8%) unrelated to treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent with clinical trial data, melflufen had an expected safety profile with manageable toxicity and clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with RRMM treated in the real-world setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":"114 6","pages":"982-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejh.14398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.14398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone is fully approved in Europe for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of melflufen in the real-world setting.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis, we examined baseline features, efficacy, and safety outcomes with melflufen plus dexamethasone in a cohort of 12 patients with heavily pre-treated RRMM at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA.
Results
Patients had received a median of 5.5 prior lines of therapy. Three patients (25%) had extramedullary disease, three (25%) cytogenetically high-risk features, and five (42%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 55% (complete response: three [27%], very good partial response: one [9%], partial response: two [18%] patients). Five patients (42%) had stable disease; one was non-evaluable. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly hematologic and proved manageable; two patients had Grade 2 infections. Reasons for melflufen discontinuation were progressive disease (42%), drug withdrawal from the United States market (33%), AEs (17%), and sudden death (8%) unrelated to treatment.
Conclusions
Consistent with clinical trial data, melflufen had an expected safety profile with manageable toxicity and clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with RRMM treated in the real-world setting.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.