Deep learning image enhancement for confident diagnosis of TMJ osteoarthritis in zero-TE MR imaging.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Chena Lee, Joonsung Lee, Sagar Mandava, Maggie Fung, Yoon Joo Choi, Kug Jin Jeon, Sang-Sun Han
{"title":"Deep learning image enhancement for confident diagnosis of TMJ osteoarthritis in zero-TE MR imaging.","authors":"Chena Lee, Joonsung Lee, Sagar Mandava, Maggie Fung, Yoon Joo Choi, Kug Jin Jeon, Sang-Sun Han","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning method for denoising and artifact reduction (AR) in zero-TE (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Also, Clinical applicability was evaluated by comparing image diagnosis to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For thirty patients CBCT and routine ZTE-MRI data was collected, and an additional reduced scan time-ZTE-MRI was also obtained. Scan time-reduced image sets were processed into denoised and AR image based on deep learning technique. The image quality of routine sequence, de-noised and AR image sets were compared in quantitative evaluation using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and in qualitative using 3-point grading system (0, poor; 1, good; 2, excellent). The presence of osteoarthritis was assessed in each imaging protocol. Diagnostic accuracy of each protocol was compared against the CBCT results, which served as the reference standard. The SNR and the qualitative scores was compared using analysis of variance test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the Cohen κ (<0.5 = poor; 0.5 to < 0.75 = moderate; 0.75 to < 0.9 = good; ≥0.9 = excellent).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both denoised and AR protocol resulted the significantly enhanced SNR compared to routine protocol and AR protocol showed higher SNR than denoised one. The qualitative assessment also showed highest grade in AR protocol with statistical significance. The osteoarthritis diagnosis showed enhanced agreement with CBCT in denoised (κ=0.928) and AR images (κ=0.929) than routine images (κ=0.707).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A newly developed deep learning technique for both denoising and artifact reduction in ZTE-MRI presented clinical usefulness. Specifically, AR protocol showed significantly improved image quality and comparable diagnostic accuracy as CBCT. It can be expected that this novel technique would help overcome the current limitation of ZTE-MRI for replacing CBCT in bone imaging of TMJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning method for denoising and artifact reduction (AR) in zero-TE (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Also, Clinical applicability was evaluated by comparing image diagnosis to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: For thirty patients CBCT and routine ZTE-MRI data was collected, and an additional reduced scan time-ZTE-MRI was also obtained. Scan time-reduced image sets were processed into denoised and AR image based on deep learning technique. The image quality of routine sequence, de-noised and AR image sets were compared in quantitative evaluation using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and in qualitative using 3-point grading system (0, poor; 1, good; 2, excellent). The presence of osteoarthritis was assessed in each imaging protocol. Diagnostic accuracy of each protocol was compared against the CBCT results, which served as the reference standard. The SNR and the qualitative scores was compared using analysis of variance test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed using the Cohen κ (<0.5 = poor; 0.5 to < 0.75 = moderate; 0.75 to < 0.9 = good; ≥0.9 = excellent).

Results: Both denoised and AR protocol resulted the significantly enhanced SNR compared to routine protocol and AR protocol showed higher SNR than denoised one. The qualitative assessment also showed highest grade in AR protocol with statistical significance. The osteoarthritis diagnosis showed enhanced agreement with CBCT in denoised (κ=0.928) and AR images (κ=0.929) than routine images (κ=0.707).

Conclusions: A newly developed deep learning technique for both denoising and artifact reduction in ZTE-MRI presented clinical usefulness. Specifically, AR protocol showed significantly improved image quality and comparable diagnostic accuracy as CBCT. It can be expected that this novel technique would help overcome the current limitation of ZTE-MRI for replacing CBCT in bone imaging of TMJ.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信