Abortion care in the emergency department: A national survey of emergency physicians' perspectives.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1111/acem.70002
Abigail M Kempf, Miriam R Singer, Maetal Haas-Kogan, Andrea Pelletier, Ari B Friedman, Sarah Rae Easter, Deborah Bartz
{"title":"Abortion care in the emergency department: A national survey of emergency physicians' perspectives.","authors":"Abigail M Kempf, Miriam R Singer, Maetal Haas-Kogan, Andrea Pelletier, Ari B Friedman, Sarah Rae Easter, Deborah Bartz","doi":"10.1111/acem.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The emergency department (ED) is an essential setting for diagnosis of pregnancy, confirmation of pregnancy location, and management of pregnancy loss and other complications. This health care service delivery is especially important for patients with limited or complicated access into reproductive health care elsewhere. We seek to assess emergency physicians' knowledge, training, attitudes, and practices related to pregnancy options counseling, reproductive health referrals, and provision of medical- and procedural-induced abortion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a sample of emergency physicians in person at a U.S. national medical meeting regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to reproductive health care delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate differences between abortion-restrictive and -permissive states and chi-square tests were used to compare proportions between the two groups and Wilcoxon signed rank was used to compare median scores between questions. Thematic analysis was used to review qualitative responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 295 emergency physicians approached, 252 (85.4%) completed study procedures. The majority (n = 218, 86.5%) practiced in abortion-permissive states. Most (n = 178, 70.6%) supported abortion provision in the ED if legally allowed, though only about half (n = 131, 52.0%) reported ever prescribing medication abortion pills. Despite higher proportions reporting training in services, a small minority responded they could still independently provide pregnancy options counseling (25.1%), direct referrals for abortion (34.9%), medical management for early pregnancy loss (15.1%) or induced abortion (10.7%), or uterine aspiration for any pregnancy indication (1.6%). Training and knowledge were similar, though practice patterns and attitudes differed when comparing abortion-restrictive to -permissive states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national survey demonstrates that, while most emergency physicians support the provision of abortion care in this setting, they do not routinely provide this care due to a variety of factors including lack of knowledge, lack of training, and legal and institutional restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"848-856"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The emergency department (ED) is an essential setting for diagnosis of pregnancy, confirmation of pregnancy location, and management of pregnancy loss and other complications. This health care service delivery is especially important for patients with limited or complicated access into reproductive health care elsewhere. We seek to assess emergency physicians' knowledge, training, attitudes, and practices related to pregnancy options counseling, reproductive health referrals, and provision of medical- and procedural-induced abortion.

Methods: We surveyed a sample of emergency physicians in person at a U.S. national medical meeting regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to reproductive health care delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate differences between abortion-restrictive and -permissive states and chi-square tests were used to compare proportions between the two groups and Wilcoxon signed rank was used to compare median scores between questions. Thematic analysis was used to review qualitative responses.

Results: Of the 295 emergency physicians approached, 252 (85.4%) completed study procedures. The majority (n = 218, 86.5%) practiced in abortion-permissive states. Most (n = 178, 70.6%) supported abortion provision in the ED if legally allowed, though only about half (n = 131, 52.0%) reported ever prescribing medication abortion pills. Despite higher proportions reporting training in services, a small minority responded they could still independently provide pregnancy options counseling (25.1%), direct referrals for abortion (34.9%), medical management for early pregnancy loss (15.1%) or induced abortion (10.7%), or uterine aspiration for any pregnancy indication (1.6%). Training and knowledge were similar, though practice patterns and attitudes differed when comparing abortion-restrictive to -permissive states.

Conclusions: This national survey demonstrates that, while most emergency physicians support the provision of abortion care in this setting, they do not routinely provide this care due to a variety of factors including lack of knowledge, lack of training, and legal and institutional restrictions.

急诊流产护理:急诊医师观点的全国调查
目的:急诊科(ED)是诊断妊娠、确定妊娠部位、处理妊娠丢失及其他并发症的重要场所。这种保健服务的提供对于在其他地方获得生殖保健的机会有限或复杂的患者尤其重要。我们试图评估急诊医生在妊娠选择咨询、生殖健康转诊以及提供药物和程序人工流产方面的知识、培训、态度和做法。方法:我们对参加美国国家医学会议的急诊医生进行了抽样调查,调查内容涉及生殖保健服务的知识、态度和实践。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来评估限制堕胎和允许堕胎状态之间的差异,使用卡方检验来比较两组之间的比例,使用Wilcoxon符号秩来比较问题之间的中位数得分。专题分析用于审查定性答复。结果:在295名急诊医生中,252名(85.4%)完成了研究程序。大多数(n = 218, 86.5%)在允许堕胎的州执业。大多数人(n = 178, 70.6%)支持在法律允许的情况下在急诊科提供堕胎服务,但只有约一半(n = 131, 52.0%)报告曾开过堕胎药。尽管报告服务培训的比例较高,但少数人表示,他们仍然可以独立提供妊娠选择咨询(25.1%)、直接转诊堕胎(34.9%)、早孕流产的医疗管理(15.1%)或人工流产(10.7%),或任何妊娠指征的子宫抽吸(1.6%)。培训和知识是相似的,尽管在比较限制堕胎和允许堕胎的国家时,实践模式和态度有所不同。结论:这项全国调查表明,虽然大多数急诊医生支持在这种情况下提供堕胎护理,但由于各种因素,包括缺乏知识、缺乏培训以及法律和制度的限制,他们并没有常规地提供这种护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信