Plasma expansion and renal perfusion in critical COVID-19 with AKI: A prospective case control study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Tomas Luther, Per Eckerbom, Eleanor Cox, Miklos Lipcsey, Sara Bülow-Anderberg, Michael Hultström, Jan Weis, Fredrik Palm, Susan Francis, Per Liss, Robert Frithiof
{"title":"Plasma expansion and renal perfusion in critical COVID-19 with AKI: A prospective case control study.","authors":"Tomas Luther, Per Eckerbom, Eleanor Cox, Miklos Lipcsey, Sara Bülow-Anderberg, Michael Hultström, Jan Weis, Fredrik Palm, Susan Francis, Per Liss, Robert Frithiof","doi":"10.1111/aas.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A decrease in renal perfusion during acute kidney injury (AKI) due to critical COVID-19 has previously been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of plasma expansion with a standardized fluid bolus on renal perfusion in critically ill patients with AKI compared to similar patients without AKI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case control study design was used to investigate group differences before and after a standardized intervention. ICU-treated COVID-19 patients without underlying kidney disease were assigned to two groups based on KDIGO Creatinine criteria for AKI. Renal perfusion was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using phase contrast and arterial spin labeling before and directly after plasma expansion with 7.5 mL/kg Ringer's Acetate (Baxter). Arithmetic means of mean arterial pressures (MAP) recorded before and after plasma infusion were compared. Data was analyzed with a mixed model repeated measures ANOVA for all kidneys using a random effect to account for research subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients with AKI and eight without were included in the study. The hemodynamic response to plasma expansion was similar in both groups, with increases in MAP by 9 mmHg (95% CI 0.5-18) and 15 mmHg (95% CI 5-24) in patients with and without AKI, respectively. Total renal perfusion and cortical perfusion were not significantly changed by plasma expansion in either group. There was a reduction of medullary perfusion in patients without AKI from 55 (95% CI 39-79) to 34 (95% CI 24-48) mL/min/100 g (p = .0027).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma expansion with a standardized fluid bolus did not increase renal perfusion in critically ill patients with COVID-19, with or without AKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e70004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A decrease in renal perfusion during acute kidney injury (AKI) due to critical COVID-19 has previously been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of plasma expansion with a standardized fluid bolus on renal perfusion in critically ill patients with AKI compared to similar patients without AKI.

Methods: A case control study design was used to investigate group differences before and after a standardized intervention. ICU-treated COVID-19 patients without underlying kidney disease were assigned to two groups based on KDIGO Creatinine criteria for AKI. Renal perfusion was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging using phase contrast and arterial spin labeling before and directly after plasma expansion with 7.5 mL/kg Ringer's Acetate (Baxter). Arithmetic means of mean arterial pressures (MAP) recorded before and after plasma infusion were compared. Data was analyzed with a mixed model repeated measures ANOVA for all kidneys using a random effect to account for research subjects.

Results: Nine patients with AKI and eight without were included in the study. The hemodynamic response to plasma expansion was similar in both groups, with increases in MAP by 9 mmHg (95% CI 0.5-18) and 15 mmHg (95% CI 5-24) in patients with and without AKI, respectively. Total renal perfusion and cortical perfusion were not significantly changed by plasma expansion in either group. There was a reduction of medullary perfusion in patients without AKI from 55 (95% CI 39-79) to 34 (95% CI 24-48) mL/min/100 g (p = .0027).

Conclusion: Plasma expansion with a standardized fluid bolus did not increase renal perfusion in critically ill patients with COVID-19, with or without AKI.

危重COVID-19合并AKI的血浆扩张和肾灌注:一项前瞻性病例对照研究
导论:在COVID-19重症急性肾损伤(AKI)期间,肾脏灌注减少已被证实。本研究的目的是比较血浆扩张与标准化液体丸对急性肾损伤危重患者肾灌注的影响,并与无急性肾损伤的类似患者进行比较。方法:采用病例对照研究设计,探讨标准化干预前后的组间差异。根据AKI的KDIGO肌酐标准将icu治疗的无基础肾脏疾病的COVID-19患者分为两组。7.5 mL/kg林格氏醋酸盐(Baxter)血浆扩张前后,通过磁共振成像、相衬和动脉自旋标记评估肾脏灌注。比较输注血浆前后平均动脉压(MAP)的算术平均值。数据分析采用混合模型重复测量方差分析所有肾脏使用随机效应来解释研究对象。结果:9例AKI患者和8例无AKI患者纳入研究。两组对血浆扩张的血流动力学反应相似,有AKI和无AKI患者的MAP分别增加了9 mmHg (95% CI 0.5-18)和15 mmHg (95% CI 5-24)。血浆扩张对两组肾脏总灌注和皮质灌注均无显著影响。无AKI患者的髓质灌注从55 mL/min/ 100g (95% CI 39-79)减少到34 mL/min/ 100g (95% CI 24-48) (p = 0.0027)。结论:在伴有或不伴有AKI的COVID-19危重患者中,标准化液体丸血浆扩张并未增加肾脏灌注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信