Long-term outcomes of cutaneous ureterostomy with the aim of stent-free stoma

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1002/bco2.499
Chul Jang Kim, Masayuki Nagasawa, Eiki Hanada, Kayo Takeuchi, Toshiyuki Ihara, Susumu Kageyama
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of cutaneous ureterostomy with the aim of stent-free stoma","authors":"Chul Jang Kim,&nbsp;Masayuki Nagasawa,&nbsp;Eiki Hanada,&nbsp;Kayo Takeuchi,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Ihara,&nbsp;Susumu Kageyama","doi":"10.1002/bco2.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated post-surgical renal function and risk factors for renal function deterioration (RFD), defined as a &gt; 25% decrease in the estimated serum creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), after cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) and collected follow-up data on hydronephrosis after CU construction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>CU was performed following radical cystectomy in 46 patients (90 renal units [RUs]) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The median follow-up period was 102.1 months. The stoma was created using the Toyoda method. A surgical stabilization step for the abdominal tunnel of the ureters was added. Post-surgical changes in renal function and hydronephrosis were reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At the end of follow-up, RFD was observed in 19 (41.3%) of 46 patients. The 5- and 10-year RFD-free survivals were 61.3% and 47.2%, respectively. Seventy-six RUs (84.4%) exhibited no hydronephrosis, whereas six RUs (6.7%) in six patients progressed to atrophic kidneys. Stent catheters were inserted in eight RUs (8.9%) in six patients. After excluding 10 patients with progression to atrophic kidneys (six patients) or ureteral obstruction attributable to retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis by cancer progression (four patients), RFD was identified in 13 (36.1%) out of 36 patients. These patients were categorized into Group 1 (without RFD, 23 patients) and Group 2 (with RFD, 13 patients). Stent insertion was identified as a significant predictor of post-surgical RFD by univariate (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and multivariate analyses (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>RFD was observed in 41.3% patients during follow-up. We achieved an 84.4% hydronephrosis-free rate following CU construction. Stent insertion was identified as a significant risk factor for RFD after CU construction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.499","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We evaluated post-surgical renal function and risk factors for renal function deterioration (RFD), defined as a > 25% decrease in the estimated serum creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), after cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) and collected follow-up data on hydronephrosis after CU construction.

Patients and methods

CU was performed following radical cystectomy in 46 patients (90 renal units [RUs]) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The median follow-up period was 102.1 months. The stoma was created using the Toyoda method. A surgical stabilization step for the abdominal tunnel of the ureters was added. Post-surgical changes in renal function and hydronephrosis were reviewed.

Results

At the end of follow-up, RFD was observed in 19 (41.3%) of 46 patients. The 5- and 10-year RFD-free survivals were 61.3% and 47.2%, respectively. Seventy-six RUs (84.4%) exhibited no hydronephrosis, whereas six RUs (6.7%) in six patients progressed to atrophic kidneys. Stent catheters were inserted in eight RUs (8.9%) in six patients. After excluding 10 patients with progression to atrophic kidneys (six patients) or ureteral obstruction attributable to retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis by cancer progression (four patients), RFD was identified in 13 (36.1%) out of 36 patients. These patients were categorized into Group 1 (without RFD, 23 patients) and Group 2 (with RFD, 13 patients). Stent insertion was identified as a significant predictor of post-surgical RFD by univariate (p = 0.001) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

RFD was observed in 41.3% patients during follow-up. We achieved an 84.4% hydronephrosis-free rate following CU construction. Stent insertion was identified as a significant risk factor for RFD after CU construction.

Abstract Image

以无支架造口为目的的皮肤输尿管造口术的远期疗效
目的:我们评估术后肾功能和肾功能恶化(RFD)的危险因素,定义为皮肤输尿管造瘘(CU)后估计血清肌酐基础肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降25%,并收集输尿管造瘘后肾积水的随访数据。患者和方法46例患者(90肾单位[RUs])根治性膀胱切除术后行CU,最小随访期为12个月。中位随访期为102.1个月。这个气孔是用丰田法造出来的。增加了输尿管腹部隧道的手术稳定步骤。我们回顾了术后肾功能和肾积水的变化。结果随访结束时,46例患者中有19例(41.3%)出现RFD。5年和10年无rfd生存率分别为61.3%和47.2%。76例(84.4%)未出现肾积水,6例患者中6例(6.7%)进展为肾萎缩。6例患者中8例置入支架导管(8.9%)。在排除10例进展为肾萎缩(6例)或肿瘤进展导致腹膜后淋巴结转移的输尿管梗阻(4例)后,36例患者中有13例(36.1%)被确定为RFD。将这些患者分为1组(无RFD, 23例)和2组(有RFD, 13例)。单因素分析(p = 0.001)和多因素分析(p = 0.001)表明,支架置入是术后RFD的重要预测因素。结论41.3%的患者在随访中出现RFD。在CU构建后,我们实现了84.4%的无肾积水率。支架插入被认为是CU构建后RFD的重要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信