A Comparison of Educational Perspectives on VDI 2221 and Axiomatic Design

Patrick Kröpfl , Christian Landschützer , Hannes Hick , Wajih Haider Awan , Christopher A. Brown
{"title":"A Comparison of Educational Perspectives on VDI 2221 and Axiomatic Design","authors":"Patrick Kröpfl ,&nbsp;Christian Landschützer ,&nbsp;Hannes Hick ,&nbsp;Wajih Haider Awan ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.procs.2025.01.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engineering design methods play a crucial role in both academia and industry. These systematic approaches facilitate product and system development, allowing for innovative solutions and refinements. Specifically, this paper will compare two common engineering design methods Axiomatic Design (AD) and VDI 2221 in terms of their application in teaching and their transferability to industry, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Firstly, a quantitative comparison of the two methods will be conducted. Comparative factors will include scope, accessibility, required prior knowledge, and the availability of tools for each method. Following this, insights from teaching experiences at the Technical University of Graz and Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) will be discussed, focusing on the teachability of the methods. This will provide insights into the effectiveness and suitability of the methods for higher education. The transfer potential of the methods to SMEs will be derived from these. Finally, the findings and improvement potential will be summarized, and possibilities for the knowledge transfer of engineering design methods to SMEs will be formulated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20465,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Computer Science","volume":"253 ","pages":"Pages 94-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705092500081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engineering design methods play a crucial role in both academia and industry. These systematic approaches facilitate product and system development, allowing for innovative solutions and refinements. Specifically, this paper will compare two common engineering design methods Axiomatic Design (AD) and VDI 2221 in terms of their application in teaching and their transferability to industry, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Firstly, a quantitative comparison of the two methods will be conducted. Comparative factors will include scope, accessibility, required prior knowledge, and the availability of tools for each method. Following this, insights from teaching experiences at the Technical University of Graz and Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) will be discussed, focusing on the teachability of the methods. This will provide insights into the effectiveness and suitability of the methods for higher education. The transfer potential of the methods to SMEs will be derived from these. Finally, the findings and improvement potential will be summarized, and possibilities for the knowledge transfer of engineering design methods to SMEs will be formulated.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信