Joint resource exchange and pricing for intercity multimodal transport systems

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Xiaoshu Ding, Sisi Jian
{"title":"Joint resource exchange and pricing for intercity multimodal transport systems","authors":"Xiaoshu Ding,&nbsp;Sisi Jian","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2025.103184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intercity multimodal transportation systems hold great promise for enhancing travel, boosting regional economies, and promoting sustainability. However, realizing their full potential hinges on effective cooperation among transport service providers (TSPs), which current practices often lack. This study proposes a novel framework to address this challenge by leveraging price competition through mobility resource exchange. Our framework considers both independent TSP operations and collaborative resource sharing, incorporating the price elasticity of demand to determine optimal resource exchange and pricing strategies. Through comprehensive analysis of Nash equilibrium outcomes under various capacity conditions, we identify strategies that maximize total profit for participating TSPs. Furthermore, we introduce an ex-post revenue sharing rule to ensure equitable profit allocation among alliance members. Our analytical findings prove that a resource exchange alliance consistently outperforms a no alliance scenario in terms of total profit, particularly in competitive markets with ample resources. Remarkably, the alliance can even achieve the first-best profit level, typically attainable only through perfect coordination. Numerical studies using real-world data further validate the viability of the proposed resource exchange framework. Results demonstrate that a resource exchange alliance not only ensures equitable benefit distribution but also consistently enhances profits across all price elasticity scenarios, highlighting its potential to revolutionize intercity multimodal transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 103184"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261525000335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercity multimodal transportation systems hold great promise for enhancing travel, boosting regional economies, and promoting sustainability. However, realizing their full potential hinges on effective cooperation among transport service providers (TSPs), which current practices often lack. This study proposes a novel framework to address this challenge by leveraging price competition through mobility resource exchange. Our framework considers both independent TSP operations and collaborative resource sharing, incorporating the price elasticity of demand to determine optimal resource exchange and pricing strategies. Through comprehensive analysis of Nash equilibrium outcomes under various capacity conditions, we identify strategies that maximize total profit for participating TSPs. Furthermore, we introduce an ex-post revenue sharing rule to ensure equitable profit allocation among alliance members. Our analytical findings prove that a resource exchange alliance consistently outperforms a no alliance scenario in terms of total profit, particularly in competitive markets with ample resources. Remarkably, the alliance can even achieve the first-best profit level, typically attainable only through perfect coordination. Numerical studies using real-world data further validate the viability of the proposed resource exchange framework. Results demonstrate that a resource exchange alliance not only ensures equitable benefit distribution but also consistently enhances profits across all price elasticity scenarios, highlighting its potential to revolutionize intercity multimodal transportation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信