Model’s parameter sensitivity assessment and their impact on Urban Densification using regression analysis

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Anasua Chakraborty , Mitali Yeshwant Joshi , Ahmed Mustafa , Mario Cools , Jacques Teller
{"title":"Model’s parameter sensitivity assessment and their impact on Urban Densification using regression analysis","authors":"Anasua Chakraborty ,&nbsp;Mitali Yeshwant Joshi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mustafa ,&nbsp;Mario Cools ,&nbsp;Jacques Teller","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of different global and local variables in urban development processes requires a systematic study to fully comprehend the underlying complexities in them. The interplay between such variables is crucial for modelling urban growth to closely reflects reality. Despite extensive research, ambiguity remains about how variations in these input variables influence urban densification. In this study, we conduct a global sensitivity analysis (SA) using a multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model to assess the model’s explanatory and predictive power. We examine the influence of global variables, including spatial resolution, neighborhood size, and density classes, under different input combinations at a provincial scale to understand their impact on densification. Additionally, we perform a stepwise regression to identify the significant explanatory variables that are important for understanding densification in the Brussels Metropolitan Area (BMA). Our results indicate that a finer spatial resolution of 50 m and 100 m, smaller neighborhood size of 5 × 5 and 3 × 3, and specific density classes—namely 3 (non-built-up, low and high built-up) and 4 (non-built-up, low, medium and high built-up)—optimally explain and predict urban densification. In line with the same, the stepwise regression reveals that models with a coarser resolution of 300 m lack significant variables, reflecting a lower explanatory power for densification. This approach aids in identifying optimal and significant global variables with higher explanatory power for understanding and predicting urban densification. Furthermore, these findings are reproducible in a global urban context, offering valuable insights for planners, modelers and geographers in managing future urban growth and minimizing modelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266668392500015X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of different global and local variables in urban development processes requires a systematic study to fully comprehend the underlying complexities in them. The interplay between such variables is crucial for modelling urban growth to closely reflects reality. Despite extensive research, ambiguity remains about how variations in these input variables influence urban densification. In this study, we conduct a global sensitivity analysis (SA) using a multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model to assess the model’s explanatory and predictive power. We examine the influence of global variables, including spatial resolution, neighborhood size, and density classes, under different input combinations at a provincial scale to understand their impact on densification. Additionally, we perform a stepwise regression to identify the significant explanatory variables that are important for understanding densification in the Brussels Metropolitan Area (BMA). Our results indicate that a finer spatial resolution of 50 m and 100 m, smaller neighborhood size of 5 × 5 and 3 × 3, and specific density classes—namely 3 (non-built-up, low and high built-up) and 4 (non-built-up, low, medium and high built-up)—optimally explain and predict urban densification. In line with the same, the stepwise regression reveals that models with a coarser resolution of 300 m lack significant variables, reflecting a lower explanatory power for densification. This approach aids in identifying optimal and significant global variables with higher explanatory power for understanding and predicting urban densification. Furthermore, these findings are reproducible in a global urban context, offering valuable insights for planners, modelers and geographers in managing future urban growth and minimizing modelling.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信