Optimal ecological restoration strategy development based on value-cost trade-offs

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Yunxuan Liu , Cui Zhang , Miaomiao Xie , Jingyi Xie
{"title":"Optimal ecological restoration strategy development based on value-cost trade-offs","authors":"Yunxuan Liu ,&nbsp;Cui Zhang ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Xie ,&nbsp;Jingyi Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration can provide a holistic and systemic perspective for the implementation of ecosystem protection and restoration projects. However, making decisions on optimal ecological restoration strategies remains a challenge. This study supports strategy development by balancing ecological improvement and economic viability. In this study, we took Huanghua, a county under provincial jurisdiction in China, as an example. We identified areas prioritized for ecological restoration by employing the research paradigm of \"sources-resistance surface-corridors-nodes\". In addition, we searched for Pareto-optimal solutions using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to balance the trade-offs between different objectives. The results of this study revealed that 46 ecological barriers were identified as priority ecological restoration areas in Huanghua, mainly for cropland and construction land. Three optimal ecological restoration strategies with high value<img>cost ratio, high ecological value, and low implementation cost were proposed for typical ecological restoration priority areas for different decision-making needs. Area I has the highest value<img>cost ratio, whereas Area II and Area III have the same value<img>cost ratio, and it is most appropriate to prioritize restoration for Area I. When the investment budget is lower than the implementation cost of ecological restoration, ecological restoration projects with a high value<img>cost ratio are often chosen. This study constructed a methodological framework for formulating optimal ecological restoration strategies, which effectively enhanced the science of the decision-making process. The results provide a highly valuable scientific basis for developing ecological restoration strategies in Huanghua.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restoration can provide a holistic and systemic perspective for the implementation of ecosystem protection and restoration projects. However, making decisions on optimal ecological restoration strategies remains a challenge. This study supports strategy development by balancing ecological improvement and economic viability. In this study, we took Huanghua, a county under provincial jurisdiction in China, as an example. We identified areas prioritized for ecological restoration by employing the research paradigm of "sources-resistance surface-corridors-nodes". In addition, we searched for Pareto-optimal solutions using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to balance the trade-offs between different objectives. The results of this study revealed that 46 ecological barriers were identified as priority ecological restoration areas in Huanghua, mainly for cropland and construction land. Three optimal ecological restoration strategies with high valuecost ratio, high ecological value, and low implementation cost were proposed for typical ecological restoration priority areas for different decision-making needs. Area I has the highest valuecost ratio, whereas Area II and Area III have the same valuecost ratio, and it is most appropriate to prioritize restoration for Area I. When the investment budget is lower than the implementation cost of ecological restoration, ecological restoration projects with a high valuecost ratio are often chosen. This study constructed a methodological framework for formulating optimal ecological restoration strategies, which effectively enhanced the science of the decision-making process. The results provide a highly valuable scientific basis for developing ecological restoration strategies in Huanghua.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信