{"title":"Assessing the quality of whole slide images in cytology from nuclei features","authors":"Paul Barthe , Romain Brixtel , Yann Caillot , Benoît Lemoine , Arnaud Renouf , Vianney Thurotte , Ouarda Beniken , Sébastien Bougleux , Olivier Lézoray","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms into digital pathology laboratories faces several challenges, notably the variation in whole slide image preparation protocols. The diversity of preparation pipelines forces algorithms to be protocol-dependant. Moreover, the error susceptibility of each stage in the preparation process implies a need of quality control tools. To address these challenges, this article introduces a straightforward, interpretable, and computationally efficient quality control module to ensure optimal algorithmic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The proposed quality control module ensures algorithmic performance by representing an algorithm by a reference whole slide image preparation protocol validated on it. Then, inspired by data description methods, a preparation protocol is represented by nuclei feature distributions, obtained for several whole slide images it has produced. The quality of a preparation protocol is evaluated according to several reference preparation protocols, by comparing their feature distributions with a weighted distance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through empirical analysis conducted on seven distinct preparation protocols, we demonstrated that the proposed method build a quality module that clearly discriminates each preparation. Additionally, we showed that this module performs well on more larger and realistic corpus from laboratories routine, detecting quality deviations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Even if the proposed method necessitates minimal data and few computational resources, we showed that it is interpretable and relevant on realistic corpus from several laboratories' routine. We strongly believe in the necessity of quality control from the algorithmic perspective and hope this kind of approach will be extended to improve quality and reliability of digital pathology whole slide images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
Implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms into digital pathology laboratories faces several challenges, notably the variation in whole slide image preparation protocols. The diversity of preparation pipelines forces algorithms to be protocol-dependant. Moreover, the error susceptibility of each stage in the preparation process implies a need of quality control tools. To address these challenges, this article introduces a straightforward, interpretable, and computationally efficient quality control module to ensure optimal algorithmic performance.
Methods
The proposed quality control module ensures algorithmic performance by representing an algorithm by a reference whole slide image preparation protocol validated on it. Then, inspired by data description methods, a preparation protocol is represented by nuclei feature distributions, obtained for several whole slide images it has produced. The quality of a preparation protocol is evaluated according to several reference preparation protocols, by comparing their feature distributions with a weighted distance.
Results
Through empirical analysis conducted on seven distinct preparation protocols, we demonstrated that the proposed method build a quality module that clearly discriminates each preparation. Additionally, we showed that this module performs well on more larger and realistic corpus from laboratories routine, detecting quality deviations.
Conclusion
Even if the proposed method necessitates minimal data and few computational resources, we showed that it is interpretable and relevant on realistic corpus from several laboratories' routine. We strongly believe in the necessity of quality control from the algorithmic perspective and hope this kind of approach will be extended to improve quality and reliability of digital pathology whole slide images.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.