Assessing the quality of whole slide images in cytology from nuclei features

Q2 Medicine
Paul Barthe , Romain Brixtel , Yann Caillot , Benoît Lemoine , Arnaud Renouf , Vianney Thurotte , Ouarda Beniken , Sébastien Bougleux , Olivier Lézoray
{"title":"Assessing the quality of whole slide images in cytology from nuclei features","authors":"Paul Barthe ,&nbsp;Romain Brixtel ,&nbsp;Yann Caillot ,&nbsp;Benoît Lemoine ,&nbsp;Arnaud Renouf ,&nbsp;Vianney Thurotte ,&nbsp;Ouarda Beniken ,&nbsp;Sébastien Bougleux ,&nbsp;Olivier Lézoray","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms into digital pathology laboratories faces several challenges, notably the variation in whole slide image preparation protocols. The diversity of preparation pipelines forces algorithms to be protocol-dependant. Moreover, the error susceptibility of each stage in the preparation process implies a need of quality control tools. To address these challenges, this article introduces a straightforward, interpretable, and computationally efficient quality control module to ensure optimal algorithmic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The proposed quality control module ensures algorithmic performance by representing an algorithm by a reference whole slide image preparation protocol validated on it. Then, inspired by data description methods, a preparation protocol is represented by nuclei feature distributions, obtained for several whole slide images it has produced. The quality of a preparation protocol is evaluated according to several reference preparation protocols, by comparing their feature distributions with a weighted distance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through empirical analysis conducted on seven distinct preparation protocols, we demonstrated that the proposed method build a quality module that clearly discriminates each preparation. Additionally, we showed that this module performs well on more larger and realistic corpus from laboratories routine, detecting quality deviations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Even if the proposed method necessitates minimal data and few computational resources, we showed that it is interpretable and relevant on realistic corpus from several laboratories' routine. We strongly believe in the necessity of quality control from the algorithmic perspective and hope this kind of approach will be extended to improve quality and reliability of digital pathology whole slide images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353925000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms into digital pathology laboratories faces several challenges, notably the variation in whole slide image preparation protocols. The diversity of preparation pipelines forces algorithms to be protocol-dependant. Moreover, the error susceptibility of each stage in the preparation process implies a need of quality control tools. To address these challenges, this article introduces a straightforward, interpretable, and computationally efficient quality control module to ensure optimal algorithmic performance.

Methods

The proposed quality control module ensures algorithmic performance by representing an algorithm by a reference whole slide image preparation protocol validated on it. Then, inspired by data description methods, a preparation protocol is represented by nuclei feature distributions, obtained for several whole slide images it has produced. The quality of a preparation protocol is evaluated according to several reference preparation protocols, by comparing their feature distributions with a weighted distance.

Results

Through empirical analysis conducted on seven distinct preparation protocols, we demonstrated that the proposed method build a quality module that clearly discriminates each preparation. Additionally, we showed that this module performs well on more larger and realistic corpus from laboratories routine, detecting quality deviations.

Conclusion

Even if the proposed method necessitates minimal data and few computational resources, we showed that it is interpretable and relevant on realistic corpus from several laboratories' routine. We strongly believe in the necessity of quality control from the algorithmic perspective and hope this kind of approach will be extended to improve quality and reliability of digital pathology whole slide images.
从细胞核特征评价细胞学全切片图像的质量
背景和目的机器学习和人工智能算法在数字病理实验室的实施面临着一些挑战,特别是整个幻灯片图像制备协议的变化。准备管道的多样性迫使算法依赖于协议。此外,制备过程中每个阶段的误差敏感性意味着需要质量控制工具。为了解决这些挑战,本文介绍了一个简单、可解释且计算效率高的质量控制模块,以确保最佳算法性能。方法所提出的质量控制模块通过在其上验证的参考全幻灯片图像制备协议来表示算法,从而保证算法的性能。然后,在数据描述方法的启发下,对所生成的几张完整的幻灯片图像,用核特征分布来表示制备方案。通过比较几个参考准备协议的特征分布和加权距离来评估准备协议的质量。结果通过对7种不同制剂方案的实证分析,我们证明所提出的方法建立了一个清晰区分每种制剂的质量模块。此外,我们还证明了该模块在实验室常规的更大、更现实的语料库上表现良好,可以检测质量偏差。结论即使所提出的方法需要最少的数据和很少的计算资源,我们也证明了它在几个实验室常规的现实语料库上是可解释的和相关的。我们坚信从算法角度进行质量控制的必要性,并希望将这种方法推广到提高数字病理整片图像的质量和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信