Knowledge and practices of emergency contraception use and associated factors among female undergraduate students in Northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

Barbra Kelly Acen, Isaac Obonyo, Tonny Ocen, Benedict Arebo, Anna Grace Auma, Humphrey Beja
{"title":"Knowledge and practices of emergency contraception use and associated factors among female undergraduate students in Northern Uganda: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Barbra Kelly Acen, Isaac Obonyo, Tonny Ocen, Benedict Arebo, Anna Grace Auma, Humphrey Beja","doi":"10.1177/17455057251321204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency contraception (EC) can prevent up to 95% of unplanned pregnancies if used correctly. Despite efforts to enhance its accessibility, cost and cultural stigmas persist as formidable barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the knowledge and practices of EC use and determined the associated factors among the female undergraduate students of Northern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a descriptive, institutional-based cross-sectional study conducted among the female undergraduate students of Lira University in Northern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 328 female undergraduates who were surveyed using self-administered questionnaires after obtaining informed consent from them. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and presented as frequencies and percentages, and binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the association between the outcome variable and the independent variables. Results were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and associations were considered statistically significant at <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response proportion was 328/334 (98%). Majority of the participants were 18-23 years old (233/328; 71.0%), had a consistent sexual partner (221/328; 67.4%), and unmarried (206/328; 62.8%). Almost all the participants (315/328; 96%) had heard about EC, where 150/328 (45.7%) learned about EC from health professionals and 135/328 (41.2%) learned about EC from family members and friends. The most well-known brand of EC was Postinor-2 (Levonorgestrel), as reported by 130/328(39.6%) participants. Of the study participants, 200/328 (61.0%) were knowledgeable about the correct timing of EC. Regarding practices of EC use, 214/328 (65.2%) used EC, of whom 122/214 (57.0%) acquired EC from the pharmacy, and most of the participants who had used EC used Postinor-2 (92/214; 43.0%). Of those who used EC, 175/214 (81.8%) used it to prevent unplanned pregnancy, and 182/214 (85.0%) participants used it with the correct timing. The factors that were associated with EC use were being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.27, CI: 1.61, 10.09, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.003) and the absence of a consistent current sexual partner (AOR: 8.63, CI: 4.49, 16.59, <i>p</i> ⩽ 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants showed good EC knowledge and usage, but gaps persist. Factors like being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences, and lack of a consistent current sexual partner correlated with EC use. Consistent education efforts are needed to address knowledge gaps, focusing on diverse EC forms, reliable information, and affordability.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251321204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251321204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency contraception (EC) can prevent up to 95% of unplanned pregnancies if used correctly. Despite efforts to enhance its accessibility, cost and cultural stigmas persist as formidable barriers.

Objective: This study assessed the knowledge and practices of EC use and determined the associated factors among the female undergraduate students of Northern Uganda.

Design: This was a descriptive, institutional-based cross-sectional study conducted among the female undergraduate students of Lira University in Northern Uganda.

Methods: Data were collected from 328 female undergraduates who were surveyed using self-administered questionnaires after obtaining informed consent from them. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and presented as frequencies and percentages, and binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the association between the outcome variable and the independent variables. Results were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and associations were considered statistically significant at p ⩽ 0.05.

Results: The response proportion was 328/334 (98%). Majority of the participants were 18-23 years old (233/328; 71.0%), had a consistent sexual partner (221/328; 67.4%), and unmarried (206/328; 62.8%). Almost all the participants (315/328; 96%) had heard about EC, where 150/328 (45.7%) learned about EC from health professionals and 135/328 (41.2%) learned about EC from family members and friends. The most well-known brand of EC was Postinor-2 (Levonorgestrel), as reported by 130/328(39.6%) participants. Of the study participants, 200/328 (61.0%) were knowledgeable about the correct timing of EC. Regarding practices of EC use, 214/328 (65.2%) used EC, of whom 122/214 (57.0%) acquired EC from the pharmacy, and most of the participants who had used EC used Postinor-2 (92/214; 43.0%). Of those who used EC, 175/214 (81.8%) used it to prevent unplanned pregnancy, and 182/214 (85.0%) participants used it with the correct timing. The factors that were associated with EC use were being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.27, CI: 1.61, 10.09, p ⩽ 0.003) and the absence of a consistent current sexual partner (AOR: 8.63, CI: 4.49, 16.59, p ⩽ 0.00).

Conclusion: Participants showed good EC knowledge and usage, but gaps persist. Factors like being a student who was studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences, and lack of a consistent current sexual partner correlated with EC use. Consistent education efforts are needed to address knowledge gaps, focusing on diverse EC forms, reliable information, and affordability.

Registration: Not applicable.

乌干达北部女大学生的紧急避孕知识和做法及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
背景:如果使用正确,紧急避孕(EC)可以预防高达95%的意外怀孕。尽管努力提高其可及性,但成本和文化污名仍然是巨大的障碍。目的:本研究评估乌干达北部女大学生电子商务知识和实践情况,并确定相关因素。设计:这是一项描述性的、基于机构的横断面研究,在乌干达北部里拉大学的女本科生中进行。方法:对328名女大学生进行知情同意后,采用自填问卷进行调查。使用SPSS软件对数据进行分析,并以频率和百分比表示,并使用二元和多元逻辑回归来确定结果变量与自变量之间的关联。结果以95%置信区间的比值比表示,p < 0.05认为相关性具有统计学意义。结果:有效率为328/334(98%)。大多数参与者年龄在18-23岁之间(233/328;71.0%),有固定的性伴侣(221/328;67.4%),未婚(206/328;62.8%)。几乎所有的参与者(315/328;96%的人听说过早泄,其中150/328(45.7%)从卫生专业人员那里了解早泄,135/328(41.2%)从家人和朋友那里了解早泄。有130/328(39.6%)的参与者报告说,EC最知名的品牌是Postinor-2(左炔诺孕酮)。在研究参与者中,200/328(61.0%)了解EC的正确时间。关于使用EC的实践,214/328(65.2%)使用EC,其中122/214(57.0%)从药房获得EC,使用EC的大多数参与者使用Postinor-2 (92/214;43.0%)。在使用EC的参与者中,175/214(81.8%)的参与者使用EC来预防意外怀孕,182/214(85.0%)的参与者在正确的时间使用EC。与EC使用相关的因素是在健康科学学院学习的学生(调整优势比(AOR): 4.27, CI: 1.61, 10.09, p≤0.003)和没有固定的当前性伴侣(AOR: 8.63, CI: 4.49, 16.59, p≤0.00)。结论:参与者表现出良好的电子商务知识和使用,但差距仍然存在。像在健康科学学院学习的学生,以及缺乏稳定的性伴侣等因素都与电子烟的使用有关。需要持续的教育工作来解决知识差距,重点是多样化的电子商务形式、可靠的信息和可负担性。报名:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信