Systemic barriers and stigma: Healthcare provider perspectives on perinatal and neonatal care in the fentanyl crisis

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ekaterina Burduli , Tullamora Landis , Christina Brumley , Leslie Kenefick , Kaylee Paulsgrove , Hendrée E. Jones , Celestina Barbosa-Leiker , Olivia Brooks , Maria A. Gartstein , Lisa Saldana
{"title":"Systemic barriers and stigma: Healthcare provider perspectives on perinatal and neonatal care in the fentanyl crisis","authors":"Ekaterina Burduli ,&nbsp;Tullamora Landis ,&nbsp;Christina Brumley ,&nbsp;Leslie Kenefick ,&nbsp;Kaylee Paulsgrove ,&nbsp;Hendrée E. Jones ,&nbsp;Celestina Barbosa-Leiker ,&nbsp;Olivia Brooks ,&nbsp;Maria A. Gartstein ,&nbsp;Lisa Saldana","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The rise in fentanyl use during pregnancy has created new challenges in caring for women with opioid use disorders (OUD) and their infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome or neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NAS/NOWS). Despite complexities in treating opioid-affected dyads, little research exists on healthcare workers' perspectives regarding fentanyl's impact on perinatal and neonatal care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Explore dynamic challenges fentanyl has brought to the care of perinatal women with OUD and their infants experiencing NAS/NOWS from healthcare providers' perspectives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen healthcare providers (neonatologists, OBGYNs, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and pediatricians) from the Pacific Northwest completed an online qualitative survey with a mixture of Likert-type and open-ended questions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze open-ended responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three themes emerged from provider data that reflect systemic failures in addressing the complex needs of perinatal women and their families and highlight challenges in implementation of evidence-based care: 1) Systemic Barriers to Perinatal and Infant Care, 2) Impact of Increasing Polysubstance Use on Neonates and Mothers, and 3) Stigma and Judgment from Healthcare Providers toward Perinatal Women with Substance Use Disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Themes reflected how broad and interconnected systemic issues contribute to inadequate care and support for mothers and newborns in the context of rising fentanyl and polysubstance use. Themes echoed the root of the problems lies in systemic failures—issues within the healthcare system, societal attitudes, and policy frameworks that collectively fail to meet the complex and evolving needs of families affected by the ever-changing landscape of substance use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 209644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The rise in fentanyl use during pregnancy has created new challenges in caring for women with opioid use disorders (OUD) and their infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome or neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NAS/NOWS). Despite complexities in treating opioid-affected dyads, little research exists on healthcare workers' perspectives regarding fentanyl's impact on perinatal and neonatal care.

Objectives

Explore dynamic challenges fentanyl has brought to the care of perinatal women with OUD and their infants experiencing NAS/NOWS from healthcare providers' perspectives.

Methods

Fifteen healthcare providers (neonatologists, OBGYNs, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and pediatricians) from the Pacific Northwest completed an online qualitative survey with a mixture of Likert-type and open-ended questions. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze open-ended responses.

Results

Three themes emerged from provider data that reflect systemic failures in addressing the complex needs of perinatal women and their families and highlight challenges in implementation of evidence-based care: 1) Systemic Barriers to Perinatal and Infant Care, 2) Impact of Increasing Polysubstance Use on Neonates and Mothers, and 3) Stigma and Judgment from Healthcare Providers toward Perinatal Women with Substance Use Disorders.

Conclusions

Themes reflected how broad and interconnected systemic issues contribute to inadequate care and support for mothers and newborns in the context of rising fentanyl and polysubstance use. Themes echoed the root of the problems lies in systemic failures—issues within the healthcare system, societal attitudes, and policy frameworks that collectively fail to meet the complex and evolving needs of families affected by the ever-changing landscape of substance use.
系统障碍和耻辱:医疗保健提供者对芬太尼危机中的围产期和新生儿护理的看法。
妊娠期间芬太尼使用的增加给阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)妇女及其新生儿戒断综合征或新生儿阿片类药物戒断综合征(NAS/NOWS)婴儿的护理带来了新的挑战。尽管治疗阿片类药物影响的二联体很复杂,但关于芬太尼对围产期和新生儿护理影响的医护人员观点的研究很少。目的:从医疗保健提供者的角度探讨芬太尼给围产期OUD妇女及其婴儿经历NAS/NOWS带来的动态挑战。方法:来自太平洋西北地区的15名医疗保健提供者(新生儿科医生、妇产科医生、执业护士、注册护士和儿科医生)完成了一项在线定性调查,其中混合了李克特型和开放式问题。反身性专题分析用于分析开放式回答。结果:从提供者数据中出现了三个主题,反映了解决围产期妇女及其家庭复杂需求的系统性失败,并突出了实施循证护理的挑战:1)围产期和婴儿护理的系统性障碍,2)增加多物质使用对新生儿和母亲的影响,以及3)医疗保健提供者对物质使用障碍的围产期妇女的污名和判断。结论:主题反映了在芬太尼和多物质使用上升的背景下,广泛和相互关联的系统性问题如何导致对母亲和新生儿的护理和支持不足。主题反映了问题的根源在于系统失灵,即卫生保健系统、社会态度和政策框架内的问题,这些问题共同未能满足受不断变化的药物使用情况影响的家庭复杂和不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信