Accuracy validation and user performance analysis of two new self-monitoring blood glucose systems.

IF 0.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tun-Yu Huang, Yu-Hsi Chen, Yu-Ching Li, Yen-Hsin Chiu, Hui-Jun Kang, Chih-Yu Chen
{"title":"Accuracy validation and user performance analysis of two new self-monitoring blood glucose systems.","authors":"Tun-Yu Huang, Yu-Hsi Chen, Yu-Ching Li, Yen-Hsin Chiu, Hui-Jun Kang, Chih-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1530/EDM-24-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Patients with diabetes require regular blood glucose monitoring. We evaluated the precision and user performance of two blood glucose monitoring systems, the accuracy results of GlucoTeq BGM200 and DiaRite BGM300, adhering to the EN_ISO 15197:2015 standards, which require blood glucose ≥100 mg/dL, >95% of the data within ±15% difference, and when blood glucose <100 mg/dL, >95% of the data within ±15 mg/dL. This study assessed their conformity with the YSI analyzer and other leading systems. Participants (n = 101), 18 years of age were included, covering a diverse demographic. Accuracy was determined using the YSI analyzer as the standard, employing linear regression, a consensus error grid and Bland-Altman analyses. The performance of both system users showed 100% conformity within zone A of the consensus error grid, high linear regression coefficients and minimal bias in the Bland-Altman analysis. Subjective satisfaction analyses showed average scores of 4.59 and 4.62 for BGM200 and BGM300, respectively. Comparison with other systems revealed high regression coefficients (CONTOUR®PLUS; R 2 = 0.9960, BGM200; R 2 = 0.9927, BGM300; R 2 = 0.9915, Accu-Chek® Guide; R 2 = 0.9910). Both systems demonstrated reasonable accuracy and user performance comparable to competitors' products and met international standards. Their reliability in real-world scenarios and high user satisfaction make them valuable tools for diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Learning points: </strong>Reasonable accuracy: GlucoTeq BGM200 and DiaRite BGM300 complied with EN ISO 15197:2015 standards, achieving >95% accuracy validated against the reference method the YSI analyzer. High user satisfaction: both systems scored highly (4.59-4.62/5), reflecting ease of use, reliable operation and clear result interpretation. Competitive performance: comparable to leading devices such as CONTOUR®PLUS, with strong correlation coefficients (>0.99). Regulatory compliance: the trial met stringent international standards with a diverse participant group and robust methodology. Broad applicability: reliable for clinical and home use, supporting effective diabetes management.</p>","PeriodicalId":37467,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EDM-24-0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Patients with diabetes require regular blood glucose monitoring. We evaluated the precision and user performance of two blood glucose monitoring systems, the accuracy results of GlucoTeq BGM200 and DiaRite BGM300, adhering to the EN_ISO 15197:2015 standards, which require blood glucose ≥100 mg/dL, >95% of the data within ±15% difference, and when blood glucose <100 mg/dL, >95% of the data within ±15 mg/dL. This study assessed their conformity with the YSI analyzer and other leading systems. Participants (n = 101), 18 years of age were included, covering a diverse demographic. Accuracy was determined using the YSI analyzer as the standard, employing linear regression, a consensus error grid and Bland-Altman analyses. The performance of both system users showed 100% conformity within zone A of the consensus error grid, high linear regression coefficients and minimal bias in the Bland-Altman analysis. Subjective satisfaction analyses showed average scores of 4.59 and 4.62 for BGM200 and BGM300, respectively. Comparison with other systems revealed high regression coefficients (CONTOUR®PLUS; R 2 = 0.9960, BGM200; R 2 = 0.9927, BGM300; R 2 = 0.9915, Accu-Chek® Guide; R 2 = 0.9910). Both systems demonstrated reasonable accuracy and user performance comparable to competitors' products and met international standards. Their reliability in real-world scenarios and high user satisfaction make them valuable tools for diabetes management.

Learning points: Reasonable accuracy: GlucoTeq BGM200 and DiaRite BGM300 complied with EN ISO 15197:2015 standards, achieving >95% accuracy validated against the reference method the YSI analyzer. High user satisfaction: both systems scored highly (4.59-4.62/5), reflecting ease of use, reliable operation and clear result interpretation. Competitive performance: comparable to leading devices such as CONTOUR®PLUS, with strong correlation coefficients (>0.99). Regulatory compliance: the trial met stringent international standards with a diverse participant group and robust methodology. Broad applicability: reliable for clinical and home use, supporting effective diabetes management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports publishes case reports on common and rare conditions in all areas of clinical endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism. Articles should include clear learning points which readers can use to inform medical education or clinical practice. The types of cases of interest to Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports include: -Insight into disease pathogenesis or mechanism of therapy - Novel diagnostic procedure - Novel treatment - Unique/unexpected symptoms or presentations of a disease - New disease or syndrome: presentations/diagnosis/management - Unusual effects of medical treatment - Error in diagnosis/pitfalls and caveats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信