Comparison of Molecular Testing Methodologies for CIC-Rearranged Sarcomas.

Selene C Koo, Maria Cardenas, Patricia Stow, Jennifer Neary, David A Wheeler, Zonggao Shi, Larissa V Furtado
{"title":"Comparison of Molecular Testing Methodologies for CIC-Rearranged Sarcomas.","authors":"Selene C Koo, Maria Cardenas, Patricia Stow, Jennifer Neary, David A Wheeler, Zonggao Shi, Larissa V Furtado","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0407-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Molecular detection of a capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) rearrangement is critical for diagnosing CIC-rearranged sarcoma (CIC-RS) but is analytically challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To compare the technical performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), and DNA methylation profiling for CIC-rearrangement detection in a large, mainly pediatric cohort.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 44 distinct patient tumors that were positive, equivocal, or suggestive for CIC rearrangement, including 18 central nervous system and 26 extra-central nervous system solid tumors. Forty tumors underwent FISH to detect CIC rearrangement, 31 underwent transcriptome sequencing, and 34 underwent methylation array analysis. Results for tumors tested by multiple testing modalities were compared.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Fusions were detected in 27 cases: CIC::double homeobox 4 (DUX4) (n = 15), CIC::NUT midline carcinoma family member 1 (NUTM1) (n = 4), CIC::leucine twenty homeobox (LEUTX) (n = 3), CIC::NUT family member 2B (NUTM2B) (n = 1), ataxin 1 (ATXN1)::NUTM1 (n = 1), ATXN1::NUT family member 2A/B (NUTM2A/B) (n = 1), CIC::DUX4 proximity effect (n = 1), and dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (DOCK1)::DUX4 (n = 1). Twenty-five tumors were tested by all 3 testing modalities. Apparent false-negative rates were 20% (3 of 15) for CIC FISH, 14% (2 of 14) for transcriptome sequencing, and 14% (2 of 14) for methylation array analysis. Both false-negative methylation array results had CIC::LEUTX fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Awareness of molecular testing pitfalls in the appropriate detection of CIC rearrangement is critical. Any CIC FISH result may need to be further confirmed, either with unequivocal immunohistochemical support or by another molecular method. A positive RNA-seq or methylation array analysis result may be sufficient evidence for a diagnosis of CIC-RS in the appropriate histologic context. A negative or inconclusive/unclassified RNA-seq or methylation array analysis result in a tumor with high initial suspicion for CIC-RS likely requires careful reevaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0407-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Molecular detection of a capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) rearrangement is critical for diagnosing CIC-rearranged sarcoma (CIC-RS) but is analytically challenging.

Objective.—: To compare the technical performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), and DNA methylation profiling for CIC-rearrangement detection in a large, mainly pediatric cohort.

Design.—: The study cohort consisted of 44 distinct patient tumors that were positive, equivocal, or suggestive for CIC rearrangement, including 18 central nervous system and 26 extra-central nervous system solid tumors. Forty tumors underwent FISH to detect CIC rearrangement, 31 underwent transcriptome sequencing, and 34 underwent methylation array analysis. Results for tumors tested by multiple testing modalities were compared.

Results.—: Fusions were detected in 27 cases: CIC::double homeobox 4 (DUX4) (n = 15), CIC::NUT midline carcinoma family member 1 (NUTM1) (n = 4), CIC::leucine twenty homeobox (LEUTX) (n = 3), CIC::NUT family member 2B (NUTM2B) (n = 1), ataxin 1 (ATXN1)::NUTM1 (n = 1), ATXN1::NUT family member 2A/B (NUTM2A/B) (n = 1), CIC::DUX4 proximity effect (n = 1), and dedicator of cytokinesis 1 (DOCK1)::DUX4 (n = 1). Twenty-five tumors were tested by all 3 testing modalities. Apparent false-negative rates were 20% (3 of 15) for CIC FISH, 14% (2 of 14) for transcriptome sequencing, and 14% (2 of 14) for methylation array analysis. Both false-negative methylation array results had CIC::LEUTX fusion.

Conclusions.—: Awareness of molecular testing pitfalls in the appropriate detection of CIC rearrangement is critical. Any CIC FISH result may need to be further confirmed, either with unequivocal immunohistochemical support or by another molecular method. A positive RNA-seq or methylation array analysis result may be sufficient evidence for a diagnosis of CIC-RS in the appropriate histologic context. A negative or inconclusive/unclassified RNA-seq or methylation array analysis result in a tumor with high initial suspicion for CIC-RS likely requires careful reevaluation.

cic -重排肉瘤分子检测方法的比较。
上下文。-: capicua转录抑制因子(CIC)重排的分子检测对于诊断CIC重排肉瘤(CIC- rs)至关重要,但在分析上具有挑战性。-:比较荧光原位杂交(FISH)、全转录组测序(RNA-seq)和DNA甲基化分析在大型儿科队列中检测cic重排的技术性能。-:研究队列包括44例不同的患者肿瘤,这些肿瘤呈阳性、模棱两可或提示CIC重排,包括18例中枢神经系统和26例中枢外神经系统实体瘤。40例肿瘤行FISH检测CIC重排,31例进行转录组测序,34例进行甲基化阵列分析。比较多种检测方式对肿瘤的检测结果。-:融合检测27例:CIC::双同源盒4 (DUX4) (n = 15), CIC::NUT中线癌家族成员1 (NUTM1) (n = 4), CIC::亮氨酸二十同源盒(LEUTX) (n = 3), CIC::NUT家族成员2B (NUTM2B) (n = 1), ATXN1::NUT家族成员2A/B (NUTM2A/B) (n = 1), CIC::DUX4邻近效应(n = 1),以及细胞分裂专用者1 (DOCK1)::DUX4 (n = 1)。25例肿瘤采用所有3种检测方式进行检测。表观假阴性率CIC FISH为20%(15人中有3人),转录组测序为14%(14人中有2人),甲基化阵列分析为14%(14人中有2人)。两组假阴性甲基化结果均存在CIC::LEUTX融合。-:意识到分子检测的缺陷在适当检测CIC重排是至关重要的。任何CIC FISH结果可能需要进一步确认,无论是明确的免疫组织化学支持还是其他分子方法。在适当的组织学背景下,阳性rna序列或甲基化阵列分析结果可能是诊断CIC-RS的充分证据。阴性或不确定/未分类的RNA-seq或甲基化阵列分析导致最初高度怀疑CIC-RS的肿瘤可能需要仔细重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信