Nicholas Guenzel, Lani Zimmerman, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway, Hongying Daisy Dai, Fang Qiu, Dennis McChargue
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Peer Recovery Coaches for Addiction Recovery Among Indigenous Americans.","authors":"Nicholas Guenzel, Lani Zimmerman, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway, Hongying Daisy Dai, Fang Qiu, Dennis McChargue","doi":"10.1177/10783903251319789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer recovery coaches (PRCs) have experienced addiction and are trained to help others in recovery. Indigenous American (IA) adult PRCs may fill gaps of culturally specific support in addiction.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims were to: (1) evaluate the feasibility of implementing a PRC intervention compared to an attention control group recovering from a substance use disorder, (2) compare PRC and attention control groups on relapses and secondary outcomes, and (3) measure PRC strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this feasibility trial, we recruited a total of 120 adult IAs with substance use disorders. Ninety participants were randomized to the PRC group which received support from a PRC and 30 to the attention control group which received support from a research nurse. Both groups received weekly support for 12 weeks. Participants completed surveys weekly during the 12-week intervention and then monthly for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups had similar quantities of alcohol consumed, days of alcohol use, and days of drug use except that the PRC group had fewer days of alcohol use in the first 3 weeks of the intervention phase (2.05 vs. 3.5 days, <i>p</i> = .04). \"Support and advocacy\" was the most common PRC intervention. PRCs were widely accepted by individuals who completed the program, receiving positive feedback from 79% of participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot demonstrated that racially concordant PRC services likely have high acceptability among IA populations. Future studies may draw on these findings by having trained IA coaches recruit and work with individuals in-person to assist with retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"10783903251319789"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903251319789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Peer recovery coaches (PRCs) have experienced addiction and are trained to help others in recovery. Indigenous American (IA) adult PRCs may fill gaps of culturally specific support in addiction.
Aims: The aims were to: (1) evaluate the feasibility of implementing a PRC intervention compared to an attention control group recovering from a substance use disorder, (2) compare PRC and attention control groups on relapses and secondary outcomes, and (3) measure PRC strategies.
Methods: In this feasibility trial, we recruited a total of 120 adult IAs with substance use disorders. Ninety participants were randomized to the PRC group which received support from a PRC and 30 to the attention control group which received support from a research nurse. Both groups received weekly support for 12 weeks. Participants completed surveys weekly during the 12-week intervention and then monthly for 3 months.
Results: The two groups had similar quantities of alcohol consumed, days of alcohol use, and days of drug use except that the PRC group had fewer days of alcohol use in the first 3 weeks of the intervention phase (2.05 vs. 3.5 days, p = .04). "Support and advocacy" was the most common PRC intervention. PRCs were widely accepted by individuals who completed the program, receiving positive feedback from 79% of participants.
Conclusion: This pilot demonstrated that racially concordant PRC services likely have high acceptability among IA populations. Future studies may draw on these findings by having trained IA coaches recruit and work with individuals in-person to assist with retention.
背景:同伴康复教练(prc)有过成瘾经历,并接受过帮助他人康复的培训。美国原住民(IA)成人prc可能填补了成瘾方面文化特异性支持的空白。目的:目的是:(1)与从物质使用障碍中恢复的注意控制组相比,评估实施PRC干预的可行性;(2)比较PRC和注意控制组在复发和次要结局方面的差异;(3)衡量PRC策略。方法:在这项可行性试验中,我们共招募了120名有物质使用障碍的成年IAs患者。90名参与者被随机分配到PRC组,由PRC提供支持;30名参与者被随机分配到注意对照组,由一名研究护士提供支持。两组均接受为期12周的每周支持。在12周的干预期间,参与者每周完成一次调查,然后在3个月内每月完成一次调查。结果:两组的酒精消耗量、酒精使用天数和药物使用天数相似,但PRC组在干预期的前3周酒精使用天数较少(2.05 vs 3.5天,p = 0.04)。“支持和倡导”是中国最常见的干预措施。prc被完成项目的个人广泛接受,从79%的参与者那里得到了积极的反馈。结论:该试点表明,种族和谐的中华人民共和国服务可能在IA人群中具有很高的可接受性。未来的研究可能会利用这些发现,让训练有素的内部人教练进行招聘,并亲自与个人合作,以帮助留住员工。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).