Hamed Hooshangnejad, Jina Lee, Leslie Bell, Russell K. Hales, Khinh Ranh Voong, Sarah Han-Oh, Kai Ding, Reza Farjam
{"title":"Quantitative beam optimization for radiotherapy of peripheral lung lesions: A pilot study in stereotactic body radiotherapy","authors":"Hamed Hooshangnejad, Jina Lee, Leslie Bell, Russell K. Hales, Khinh Ranh Voong, Sarah Han-Oh, Kai Ding, Reza Farjam","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify beam optimization for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The new beam optimization approach was based on maximizing the therapeutic gain (TG) of the beam set by minimizing the average physical depth of the lesion with respect to the beam's eye view (BEV). The new approach was evaluated by replanning the 25 SBRT lesions retrospectively to assess if a better plan is achievable in all aspects. Difference in 25 Gy isodose line volume (IDLV<sub>25</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>), IDLV<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>15</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>10</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and IDLV<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> between the two plan cohorts were calculated as a measure of plan size and fitted in a linear regression model against the changes in the lesion depth with respect to the BEV to assess the relationship between the changes in the treatment depth and that of the plan size.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Beam optimization achieved a better plan in all cases by lowering the depth of treatment with an average of % 20.03 ± 12.30 (3.66%–45.78%). As the depth of treatment decreases, the size of the plan also decreases. We observed a reduction of % 4.64 ± 4.55 (0.02%–21.58%, <i>p</i> < 3.8 × 10<sup>−5</sup>), %5.16 ± 5.54 (0.03%-24.68%, <i>p</i> < 0.005), %6.46 ± 6.95 (−1.35%-29.05%, <i>p</i> < 0.009), %12.83 ± 9.06 (0.89%–37.65%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and %14.01 ± 9.87 (1.43%–41.84%, <i>p</i> < 4.5 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) in IDLV<sub>25</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>15</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>10</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and IDLV<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Physical depth of the lesion with respect to the BEV is inversely proportional to the TG of a beam-set and can be used as a robust and standard metric to select an appropriate beam-set for SBRT of the peripheral lung lesions. Further evaluation warrants the utility of such concept in routine clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To quantify beam optimization for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung lesions.
Method
The new beam optimization approach was based on maximizing the therapeutic gain (TG) of the beam set by minimizing the average physical depth of the lesion with respect to the beam's eye view (BEV). The new approach was evaluated by replanning the 25 SBRT lesions retrospectively to assess if a better plan is achievable in all aspects. Difference in 25 Gy isodose line volume (IDLV25Gy), IDLV20Gy, IDLV15Gy, IDLV10Gy, and IDLV5Gy between the two plan cohorts were calculated as a measure of plan size and fitted in a linear regression model against the changes in the lesion depth with respect to the BEV to assess the relationship between the changes in the treatment depth and that of the plan size.
Results
Beam optimization achieved a better plan in all cases by lowering the depth of treatment with an average of % 20.03 ± 12.30 (3.66%–45.78%). As the depth of treatment decreases, the size of the plan also decreases. We observed a reduction of % 4.64 ± 4.55 (0.02%–21.58%, p < 3.8 × 10−5), %5.16 ± 5.54 (0.03%-24.68%, p < 0.005), %6.46 ± 6.95 (−1.35%-29.05%, p < 0.009), %12.83 ± 9.06 (0.89%–37.65%, p < 0.0001), and %14.01 ± 9.87 (1.43%–41.84%, p < 4.5 × 10−6) in IDLV25Gy, IDLV20Gy, IDLV15Gy, IDLV10Gy, and IDLV5Gy, respectively.
Conclusion
Physical depth of the lesion with respect to the BEV is inversely proportional to the TG of a beam-set and can be used as a robust and standard metric to select an appropriate beam-set for SBRT of the peripheral lung lesions. Further evaluation warrants the utility of such concept in routine clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic