Quantitative beam optimization for radiotherapy of peripheral lung lesions: A pilot study in stereotactic body radiotherapy

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hamed Hooshangnejad, Jina Lee, Leslie Bell, Russell K. Hales, Khinh Ranh Voong, Sarah Han-Oh, Kai Ding, Reza Farjam
{"title":"Quantitative beam optimization for radiotherapy of peripheral lung lesions: A pilot study in stereotactic body radiotherapy","authors":"Hamed Hooshangnejad,&nbsp;Jina Lee,&nbsp;Leslie Bell,&nbsp;Russell K. Hales,&nbsp;Khinh Ranh Voong,&nbsp;Sarah Han-Oh,&nbsp;Kai Ding,&nbsp;Reza Farjam","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify beam optimization for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The new beam optimization approach was based on maximizing the therapeutic gain (TG) of the beam set by minimizing the average physical depth of the lesion with respect to the beam's eye view (BEV). The new approach was evaluated by replanning the 25 SBRT lesions retrospectively to assess if a better plan is achievable in all aspects. Difference in 25 Gy isodose line volume (IDLV<sub>25</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>), IDLV<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>15</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>10</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and IDLV<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub> between the two plan cohorts were calculated as a measure of plan size and fitted in a linear regression model against the changes in the lesion depth with respect to the BEV to assess the relationship between the changes in the treatment depth and that of the plan size.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Beam optimization achieved a better plan in all cases by lowering the depth of treatment with an average of % 20.03 ± 12.30 (3.66%–45.78%). As the depth of treatment decreases, the size of the plan also decreases. We observed a reduction of % 4.64 ± 4.55 (0.02%–21.58%, <i>p</i> &lt; 3.8 × 10<sup>−5</sup>), %5.16 ± 5.54 (0.03%-24.68%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005), %6.46 ± 6.95 (−1.35%-29.05%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.009), %12.83 ± 9.06 (0.89%–37.65%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and %14.01 ± 9.87 (1.43%–41.84%, <i>p</i> &lt; 4.5 × 10<sup>−6</sup>) in IDLV<sub>25</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>20</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>15</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, IDLV<sub>10</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, and IDLV<sub>5</sub> <sub>Gy</sub>, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Physical depth of the lesion with respect to the BEV is inversely proportional to the TG of a beam-set and can be used as a robust and standard metric to select an appropriate beam-set for SBRT of the peripheral lung lesions. Further evaluation warrants the utility of such concept in routine clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To quantify beam optimization for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of peripheral lung lesions.

Method

The new beam optimization approach was based on maximizing the therapeutic gain (TG) of the beam set by minimizing the average physical depth of the lesion with respect to the beam's eye view (BEV). The new approach was evaluated by replanning the 25 SBRT lesions retrospectively to assess if a better plan is achievable in all aspects. Difference in 25 Gy isodose line volume (IDLV25 Gy), IDLV20 Gy, IDLV15 Gy, IDLV10 Gy, and IDLV5 Gy between the two plan cohorts were calculated as a measure of plan size and fitted in a linear regression model against the changes in the lesion depth with respect to the BEV to assess the relationship between the changes in the treatment depth and that of the plan size.

Results

Beam optimization achieved a better plan in all cases by lowering the depth of treatment with an average of % 20.03 ± 12.30 (3.66%–45.78%). As the depth of treatment decreases, the size of the plan also decreases. We observed a reduction of % 4.64 ± 4.55 (0.02%–21.58%, p < 3.8 × 10−5), %5.16 ± 5.54 (0.03%-24.68%, p < 0.005), %6.46 ± 6.95 (−1.35%-29.05%, p < 0.009), %12.83 ± 9.06 (0.89%–37.65%, p < 0.0001), and %14.01 ± 9.87 (1.43%–41.84%, p < 4.5 × 10−6) in IDLV25 Gy, IDLV20 Gy, IDLV15 Gy, IDLV10 Gy, and IDLV5 Gy, respectively.

Conclusion

Physical depth of the lesion with respect to the BEV is inversely proportional to the TG of a beam-set and can be used as a robust and standard metric to select an appropriate beam-set for SBRT of the peripheral lung lesions. Further evaluation warrants the utility of such concept in routine clinical use.

Abstract Image

肺外周病变放射治疗的定量射束优化:立体定向体放射治疗试验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信