Characterization, commissioning, and clinical evaluation of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) system

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joseph P. Kowalski, Brett G. Erickson, Qiuwen Wu, Xinyi Li, Sua Yoo
{"title":"Characterization, commissioning, and clinical evaluation of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) system","authors":"Joseph P. Kowalski,&nbsp;Brett G. Erickson,&nbsp;Qiuwen Wu,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Sua Yoo","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article investigates the performance of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimetry system (myOSLchip, RadPro GmbH International, Remscheid, Germany) through the application of the commissioning framework for luminescent dosimeters as described in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 191 (AAPM TG191) report. Initial clinical experiences and dosimetric results are also presented. The following properties of the system were characterized: linearity correction factors ranged from -0.5% to +3% for dose levels spanning 0.1 to 20 Gy. Beam quality correction factors (relative to 6 MV) ranged from -4.5% (2.5FFF) to +4.5% (15MV) for photon beams and +1.9% (6 MeV) to +4.3% (20 MeV) for electron beams. An average (µ) signal loss per reading of -2.13% ± 0.20% was measured, however greater signal loss was observed in the first reading (µ = -2.6% ± 0.46%). An initial decline in individual element sensitivity relative to baseline was observed from 0–15 Gy cumulative dose (µ = -1.98% ± 0.55%), with negligible further deterioration from 15–32 Gy (µ = -2.38% ± 0.85%). Post-irradiation, there was a transient OSL signal which faded with a half-life of 1.8 min; this signal enhancement was +5% at 5 min post-irradiation and +1% at 15 min relative to 24 h. Dosimeter response was not dependent on average dose rate in the range of 100–2500 MU/min. With respect to clinical testing, equal or superior performance compared with aluminum oxide OSLs (nanoDots) is shown for a range of clinical techniques and modalities including TSET, TBI, en-face electrons, and pacemaker/out-of-field measurements. The feasibility of myOSLchip to serve as a primary clinical in vivo dosimetry system and direct replacement for Landauer's microStar system is demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the performance of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimetry system (myOSLchip, RadPro GmbH International, Remscheid, Germany) through the application of the commissioning framework for luminescent dosimeters as described in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 191 (AAPM TG191) report. Initial clinical experiences and dosimetric results are also presented. The following properties of the system were characterized: linearity correction factors ranged from -0.5% to +3% for dose levels spanning 0.1 to 20 Gy. Beam quality correction factors (relative to 6 MV) ranged from -4.5% (2.5FFF) to +4.5% (15MV) for photon beams and +1.9% (6 MeV) to +4.3% (20 MeV) for electron beams. An average (µ) signal loss per reading of -2.13% ± 0.20% was measured, however greater signal loss was observed in the first reading (µ = -2.6% ± 0.46%). An initial decline in individual element sensitivity relative to baseline was observed from 0–15 Gy cumulative dose (µ = -1.98% ± 0.55%), with negligible further deterioration from 15–32 Gy (µ = -2.38% ± 0.85%). Post-irradiation, there was a transient OSL signal which faded with a half-life of 1.8 min; this signal enhancement was +5% at 5 min post-irradiation and +1% at 15 min relative to 24 h. Dosimeter response was not dependent on average dose rate in the range of 100–2500 MU/min. With respect to clinical testing, equal or superior performance compared with aluminum oxide OSLs (nanoDots) is shown for a range of clinical techniques and modalities including TSET, TBI, en-face electrons, and pacemaker/out-of-field measurements. The feasibility of myOSLchip to serve as a primary clinical in vivo dosimetry system and direct replacement for Landauer's microStar system is demonstrated.

Abstract Image

商用BeO光激发光(OSL)系统的表征、调试和临床评估。
本文通过应用美国物理学家协会医学任务小组191 (AAPM TG191)报告中描述的发光剂量计调试框架,研究了商用BeO光刺激发光(OSL)剂量测定系统(myOSLchip, RadPro GmbH International, Remscheid, Germany)的性能。初步临床经验和剂量测定结果也提出。在0.1 ~ 20gy的剂量水平范围内,线性校正因子范围为-0.5% ~ +3%。光束质量校正系数(相对于6 MV)范围为-4.5% (2.5FFF)至+4.5% (15MV),电子束为+1.9% (6 MeV)至+4.3% (20 MeV)。测量到每次读取的平均信号损失(µ)为-2.13%±0.20%,但第一次读取时观察到更大的信号损失(µ= -2.6%±0.46%)。从0-15 Gy累积剂量(µ= -1.98%±0.55%)观察到单个元素相对于基线的初始灵敏度下降,从15-32 Gy(µ= -2.38%±0.85%)观察到可忽略的进一步恶化。辐照后出现瞬态OSL信号,其半衰期为1.8 min;照射后5分钟信号增强为+5%,照射后15分钟信号增强为+1%(相对于24小时)。剂量计的响应不依赖于100-2500 MU/min范围内的平均剂量率。在临床测试方面,与氧化铝ols(纳米点)相比,在包括TSET、TBI、正面电子和起搏器/场外测量在内的一系列临床技术和模式中表现出相同或更好的性能。myOSLchip作为主要临床体内剂量测定系统和直接替代Landauer的microStar系统的可行性被证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信