Joseph P. Kowalski, Brett G. Erickson, Qiuwen Wu, Xinyi Li, Sua Yoo
{"title":"Characterization, commissioning, and clinical evaluation of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) system","authors":"Joseph P. Kowalski, Brett G. Erickson, Qiuwen Wu, Xinyi Li, Sua Yoo","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article investigates the performance of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimetry system (myOSLchip, RadPro GmbH International, Remscheid, Germany) through the application of the commissioning framework for luminescent dosimeters as described in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 191 (AAPM TG191) report. Initial clinical experiences and dosimetric results are also presented. The following properties of the system were characterized: linearity correction factors ranged from -0.5% to +3% for dose levels spanning 0.1 to 20 Gy. Beam quality correction factors (relative to 6 MV) ranged from -4.5% (2.5FFF) to +4.5% (15MV) for photon beams and +1.9% (6 MeV) to +4.3% (20 MeV) for electron beams. An average (µ) signal loss per reading of -2.13% ± 0.20% was measured, however greater signal loss was observed in the first reading (µ = -2.6% ± 0.46%). An initial decline in individual element sensitivity relative to baseline was observed from 0–15 Gy cumulative dose (µ = -1.98% ± 0.55%), with negligible further deterioration from 15–32 Gy (µ = -2.38% ± 0.85%). Post-irradiation, there was a transient OSL signal which faded with a half-life of 1.8 min; this signal enhancement was +5% at 5 min post-irradiation and +1% at 15 min relative to 24 h. Dosimeter response was not dependent on average dose rate in the range of 100–2500 MU/min. With respect to clinical testing, equal or superior performance compared with aluminum oxide OSLs (nanoDots) is shown for a range of clinical techniques and modalities including TSET, TBI, en-face electrons, and pacemaker/out-of-field measurements. The feasibility of myOSLchip to serve as a primary clinical in vivo dosimetry system and direct replacement for Landauer's microStar system is demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article investigates the performance of a commercial BeO optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimetry system (myOSLchip, RadPro GmbH International, Remscheid, Germany) through the application of the commissioning framework for luminescent dosimeters as described in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 191 (AAPM TG191) report. Initial clinical experiences and dosimetric results are also presented. The following properties of the system were characterized: linearity correction factors ranged from -0.5% to +3% for dose levels spanning 0.1 to 20 Gy. Beam quality correction factors (relative to 6 MV) ranged from -4.5% (2.5FFF) to +4.5% (15MV) for photon beams and +1.9% (6 MeV) to +4.3% (20 MeV) for electron beams. An average (µ) signal loss per reading of -2.13% ± 0.20% was measured, however greater signal loss was observed in the first reading (µ = -2.6% ± 0.46%). An initial decline in individual element sensitivity relative to baseline was observed from 0–15 Gy cumulative dose (µ = -1.98% ± 0.55%), with negligible further deterioration from 15–32 Gy (µ = -2.38% ± 0.85%). Post-irradiation, there was a transient OSL signal which faded with a half-life of 1.8 min; this signal enhancement was +5% at 5 min post-irradiation and +1% at 15 min relative to 24 h. Dosimeter response was not dependent on average dose rate in the range of 100–2500 MU/min. With respect to clinical testing, equal or superior performance compared with aluminum oxide OSLs (nanoDots) is shown for a range of clinical techniques and modalities including TSET, TBI, en-face electrons, and pacemaker/out-of-field measurements. The feasibility of myOSLchip to serve as a primary clinical in vivo dosimetry system and direct replacement for Landauer's microStar system is demonstrated.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic