Automatic skin flash optimization in breast and chestwall VMAT with static angle modulated ports: Effect of HU and flash margin size on plan quality and robustness.
IF 2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Emily Hubley, Brandon Koger, Taoran Li, Michael Salerno, Ryan M Scheuermann, Lei Dong, Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
{"title":"Automatic skin flash optimization in breast and chestwall VMAT with static angle modulated ports: Effect of HU and flash margin size on plan quality and robustness.","authors":"Emily Hubley, Brandon Koger, Taoran Li, Michael Salerno, Ryan M Scheuermann, Lei Dong, Boon-Keng Kevin Teo","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin flash is typically added to breast and chestwall plans to ensure robust target coverage in the presence of respiratory motion, anatomic changes, and small setup uncertainties. Adding skin flash in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans is an iterative and manual process. RapidArc dynamic (RAD) is a new solution that integrates a dynamic collimator and static-gantry angle modulated ports directly into arc delivery. The automatic skin flash tool (ASF) allows users to automatically add skin flash directly within the optimizer. The user must select the thickness and Hounsfield Units (HUs) of the flash region, but the optimal values are not currently known. For 13 left- and right-sided breast and chestwall patients, RAD plans were created with no skin flash and with ASF with thickness of 5 to 20 mm and HU of -500 to 0 HU. To assess plan quality, DVH metrics for planning target volume (PTV), heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast were recorded. To assess plan robustness, the isocenter was shifted 5 mm, moving the target 5 mm anteriorly into the flash region. The changes in clinical target volume (CTV) D95% and D99% were recorded. A paired t-test was used to determine if changes in plan quality or robustness were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The addition of ≥ 7 mm of skin flash resulted in robust plans. Varying the HU did not affect robustness. Increasing the skin flash beyond 10 mm increased PTV V105%. This increase was much larger in the 0 HU plans than in the -350 HU plans. We therefore recommend using -350 HU and 7-10 mm of skin flash for anticipated inter- and intra-fraction motion of 5 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Skin flash is typically added to breast and chestwall plans to ensure robust target coverage in the presence of respiratory motion, anatomic changes, and small setup uncertainties. Adding skin flash in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans is an iterative and manual process. RapidArc dynamic (RAD) is a new solution that integrates a dynamic collimator and static-gantry angle modulated ports directly into arc delivery. The automatic skin flash tool (ASF) allows users to automatically add skin flash directly within the optimizer. The user must select the thickness and Hounsfield Units (HUs) of the flash region, but the optimal values are not currently known. For 13 left- and right-sided breast and chestwall patients, RAD plans were created with no skin flash and with ASF with thickness of 5 to 20 mm and HU of -500 to 0 HU. To assess plan quality, DVH metrics for planning target volume (PTV), heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast were recorded. To assess plan robustness, the isocenter was shifted 5 mm, moving the target 5 mm anteriorly into the flash region. The changes in clinical target volume (CTV) D95% and D99% were recorded. A paired t-test was used to determine if changes in plan quality or robustness were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The addition of ≥ 7 mm of skin flash resulted in robust plans. Varying the HU did not affect robustness. Increasing the skin flash beyond 10 mm increased PTV V105%. This increase was much larger in the 0 HU plans than in the -350 HU plans. We therefore recommend using -350 HU and 7-10 mm of skin flash for anticipated inter- and intra-fraction motion of 5 mm.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic