Effects of Exercise Intervention on Functional Mobility among Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Quantitative Evidence

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yanxia Chen MSc , Tao Huang PhD , Zhizhong Li MSc , Peisi Wang MSc , Zhihui Cheng MSc , Chun Xie PhD , Yuhan Zhang MSc , Kun Wang PhD
{"title":"Effects of Exercise Intervention on Functional Mobility among Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Quantitative Evidence","authors":"Yanxia Chen MSc ,&nbsp;Tao Huang PhD ,&nbsp;Zhizhong Li MSc ,&nbsp;Peisi Wang MSc ,&nbsp;Zhihui Cheng MSc ,&nbsp;Chun Xie PhD ,&nbsp;Yuhan Zhang MSc ,&nbsp;Kun Wang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of exercise interventions on functional mobility among older adults with cognitive impairments such as dementia or mild cognitive impairment, followed by further investigation on the possible moderators of exercise-induced effects on this outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A meta-analysis of controlled trials on exercise interventions reporting functional mobility outcomes was conducted. PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies published in English-language journals through July 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Clinical and community settings across 15 countries, including a total of 1104 older adults with cognitive impairment, were involved in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We computed pooled effect sizes based on standardized mean difference (SMD) using the random-effects models. The subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted for multiple moderating variables (eg, exercise, sample, and study characteristics). The study quality was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This meta-analysis finally included 22 studies. Results revealed that exercise interventions effectively improved functional mobility as compared with that of the control group (SMD, −0.42; 95% CI, −0.61 to −0.24; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Exercise intervention characteristics (ie, weekly training frequency and session duration) and sample characteristic (ie, percentage of women) moderated the exercise-induced effects on this interesting outcome. Subgroup analyses showed intervention with low frequency (1–2 times/wk) (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.01 to −0.42; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) had a larger improvement in mobility, followed by medium frequency (SMD, −0.33; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.10; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). In addition, interventions with a session duration of &gt; 60 minutes (SMD, −0.60; 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.36; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 45 to 60 minutes (SMD, −0.60; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.29; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) had a significant improvement in mobility. Moreover, exercise training had a significant improvement in mobility for studies with a high percentage of women (SMD, −0.49; 95% CI, −0.67 to −0.31; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>Exercise intervention is a promising way to improve functional mobility among older adults with cognitive impairment. Further evidence suggests that larger effects were observed in exercise intervention features of more than 45-minute session duration 1 to 3 times a week for at least 6 weeks regardless of exercise type. In addition, women benefit more from exercise interventions than men. Our study highlights that health care providers should prioritize integrating structured exercise programs into routine care for this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 105516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of exercise interventions on functional mobility among older adults with cognitive impairments such as dementia or mild cognitive impairment, followed by further investigation on the possible moderators of exercise-induced effects on this outcome.

Design

A meta-analysis of controlled trials on exercise interventions reporting functional mobility outcomes was conducted. PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies published in English-language journals through July 2024.

Setting and Participants

Clinical and community settings across 15 countries, including a total of 1104 older adults with cognitive impairment, were involved in the study.

Methods

We computed pooled effect sizes based on standardized mean difference (SMD) using the random-effects models. The subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted for multiple moderating variables (eg, exercise, sample, and study characteristics). The study quality was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale.

Results

This meta-analysis finally included 22 studies. Results revealed that exercise interventions effectively improved functional mobility as compared with that of the control group (SMD, −0.42; 95% CI, −0.61 to −0.24; P < .001). Exercise intervention characteristics (ie, weekly training frequency and session duration) and sample characteristic (ie, percentage of women) moderated the exercise-induced effects on this interesting outcome. Subgroup analyses showed intervention with low frequency (1–2 times/wk) (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.01 to −0.42; P < .001) had a larger improvement in mobility, followed by medium frequency (SMD, −0.33; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.10; P < .01). In addition, interventions with a session duration of > 60 minutes (SMD, −0.60; 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.36; P < .001) and 45 to 60 minutes (SMD, −0.60; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.29; P < .001) had a significant improvement in mobility. Moreover, exercise training had a significant improvement in mobility for studies with a high percentage of women (SMD, −0.49; 95% CI, −0.67 to −0.31; P < .001).

Conclusions and Implications

Exercise intervention is a promising way to improve functional mobility among older adults with cognitive impairment. Further evidence suggests that larger effects were observed in exercise intervention features of more than 45-minute session duration 1 to 3 times a week for at least 6 weeks regardless of exercise type. In addition, women benefit more from exercise interventions than men. Our study highlights that health care providers should prioritize integrating structured exercise programs into routine care for this population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信