Comparison of postoperative pain severity between primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Zemedkun Getahun, Mebratu Kebede, Mebratu Tilla, Gedion Asnak, Margherita Iuzzolino, Alemu Urmale, Hailemariam Getachew, Abebayehu Zemedkun, Tsegaye Demeke, Milion Abdi, Ashagire Sintayehu, Getahun Dendir
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative pain severity between primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Zemedkun Getahun, Mebratu Kebede, Mebratu Tilla, Gedion Asnak, Margherita Iuzzolino, Alemu Urmale, Hailemariam Getachew, Abebayehu Zemedkun, Tsegaye Demeke, Milion Abdi, Ashagire Sintayehu, Getahun Dendir","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cesarean section was associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Uncertain differences exist between parturient who undergo a primary cesarean section and a repeat cesarean section in terms of post-operative pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the degree of postoperative pain in patients who had primary and repeat cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted on 336 patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria and underwent caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Study participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. An independent sample t test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare symmetric and asymmetric data, respectively. Time to first analgesic request was analyzed using log rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cox-regression for covariates. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were done using the chi-square test. The significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high Risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain in repeated caesarean section compared to primary caesarean section in both incisional pain (RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], p = 0.002) and visceral pain (RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], p = 0.001). In comparison to the primiparas, parturient with repeated cesarean sections had highest post-operative pain severity in NRS with median NRS of 5(IQR, 3-5) at the 4th hour (p < 0.001) for the incisional pain and 6(IQR, 5-7) at the 8th hour for visceral pain, respectively, for the repeated group. The primiparas group had a longer median time to first rescue analgesic administration (median [minute], 875.7[95% CI, 750.3-1001]; P < 0.001)) than the repeated group (median [minute], 534.8 [95% CI, 426.8-642.8]; P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to primary CS, repeated cesarean had a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, both visceral and incisional; within 48-h. In future endeavors of crafting postoperative analgesic plans, it is imperative to take into account individual variations and distinctions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02951-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The cesarean section was associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Uncertain differences exist between parturient who undergo a primary cesarean section and a repeat cesarean section in terms of post-operative pain.

Objective: To compare the degree of postoperative pain in patients who had primary and repeat cesarean sections.

Method: An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted on 336 patients who fulfilled eligibility criteria and underwent caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Study participants were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. An independent sample t test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare symmetric and asymmetric data, respectively. Time to first analgesic request was analyzed using log rank Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cox-regression for covariates. Comparisons of categorical variables between groups were done using the chi-square test. The significance was determined at a P value of < 0.05.

Results: There was a high Risk of moderate to severe postoperative pain in repeated caesarean section compared to primary caesarean section in both incisional pain (RR, 1.364[95% CI, 1.12-1.66], p = 0.002) and visceral pain (RR, 1.66[95% CI, 1.40-1.66], p = 0.001). In comparison to the primiparas, parturient with repeated cesarean sections had highest post-operative pain severity in NRS with median NRS of 5(IQR, 3-5) at the 4th hour (p < 0.001) for the incisional pain and 6(IQR, 5-7) at the 8th hour for visceral pain, respectively, for the repeated group. The primiparas group had a longer median time to first rescue analgesic administration (median [minute], 875.7[95% CI, 750.3-1001]; P < 0.001)) than the repeated group (median [minute], 534.8 [95% CI, 426.8-642.8]; P < 0.001.

Conclusions: Compared to primary CS, repeated cesarean had a high incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, both visceral and incisional; within 48-h. In future endeavors of crafting postoperative analgesic plans, it is imperative to take into account individual variations and distinctions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信