Improving relationship-centered care through evaluation meetings with the resident-family-caregiver triad in nursing homes: a qualitative study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Johanna E R Rutten, Ramona Backhaus, Hilde Verbeek, Erica de Vries, Jan P H Hamers, Katya Y J Sion
{"title":"Improving relationship-centered care through evaluation meetings with the resident-family-caregiver triad in nursing homes: a qualitative study.","authors":"Johanna E R Rutten, Ramona Backhaus, Hilde Verbeek, Erica de Vries, Jan P H Hamers, Katya Y J Sion","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12425-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing and improving relationship-centered care has gained increased importance in long-term care. However, quality improvement strategies are predominantly based on quantitative quality measures for care professionals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how narrative data collected with Connecting Conversations is used in evaluation meetings to improve RCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach using structured observations was used. The participants were care professionals, residents and family members from two nursing home wards. The participating wards organized evaluation meetings to discuss the experienced quality of care based on narrative data collected with Connecting Conversations. To analyze the process of improving RCC, the organization of these meetings and the content were observed by independent researchers, and detailed notes were taken. The data were analyzed thematically by using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, three evaluation meetings were organized. Primarily, care professionals were invited to discuss the results of the interviews. One ward organized a meeting for care professionals, residents and family members, and the other decided not to invite them. The discussion of themes related to experienced quality of care within the evaluation meetings was less profound than during the interviews. In total, 12 overarching themes concerning experienced quality of care were discussed in the Connecting Conversations' interviews. Nine themes were also mentioned in one or more evaluation meetings (i.e., activities for residents, personalized attention and preferences of residents, feeling at home and communication within the care triad).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When using narrative data on quality of care to improve relationship-centered care, the full potential of narrative data is underutilized as discussions focussed on incidental problem solving rather than deeper reflections on the meaning of events in providing relationship-centered care. Establishing trust within the care triad of care professionals, family members, and residents is essential to improve relationship-centered care collaboratively.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12425-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Providing and improving relationship-centered care has gained increased importance in long-term care. However, quality improvement strategies are predominantly based on quantitative quality measures for care professionals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore how narrative data collected with Connecting Conversations is used in evaluation meetings to improve RCC.

Methods: A qualitative approach using structured observations was used. The participants were care professionals, residents and family members from two nursing home wards. The participating wards organized evaluation meetings to discuss the experienced quality of care based on narrative data collected with Connecting Conversations. To analyze the process of improving RCC, the organization of these meetings and the content were observed by independent researchers, and detailed notes were taken. The data were analyzed thematically by using conventional content analysis.

Results: In total, three evaluation meetings were organized. Primarily, care professionals were invited to discuss the results of the interviews. One ward organized a meeting for care professionals, residents and family members, and the other decided not to invite them. The discussion of themes related to experienced quality of care within the evaluation meetings was less profound than during the interviews. In total, 12 overarching themes concerning experienced quality of care were discussed in the Connecting Conversations' interviews. Nine themes were also mentioned in one or more evaluation meetings (i.e., activities for residents, personalized attention and preferences of residents, feeling at home and communication within the care triad).

Conclusion: When using narrative data on quality of care to improve relationship-centered care, the full potential of narrative data is underutilized as discussions focussed on incidental problem solving rather than deeper reflections on the meaning of events in providing relationship-centered care. Establishing trust within the care triad of care professionals, family members, and residents is essential to improve relationship-centered care collaboratively.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信