Selecting Competent Reverse Transcription Strategies to Maximise Biodiversity Recovery With eRNA Metabarcoding.

IF 5.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Fuwen Wang, Wei Xiong, Xuena Huang, Aibin Zhan
{"title":"Selecting Competent Reverse Transcription Strategies to Maximise Biodiversity Recovery With eRNA Metabarcoding.","authors":"Fuwen Wang, Wei Xiong, Xuena Huang, Aibin Zhan","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.14092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both environmental DNA (eDNA) and environmental RNA (eRNA) have been widely adopted for biodiversity assessment. While eDNA often persists longer in environments, eRNA offers a more current view of biological activities. In eRNA metabarcoding, extracted eRNA is reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) for metabarcoding. However, the efficacy of various reverse transcription strategies has not been evaluated. Here we compared the biodiversity recovery efficiency of three strategies: random priming with hexamers, oligo(dT) priming and taxa-specific priming using Mifish-U for fish in both high- and low-biodiversity regions. Our results demonstrate that reverse transcription strategies significantly impact biodiversity recovery. Random priming consistently detected the highest number of taxa in both low- and high-biodiversity regions. In low-biodiversity areas, oligo(dT) performed comparably to random hexamers; however, in high-biodiversity regions, random hexamers outperformed oligo(dT), particularly in recovering rare taxa. While taxa-specific priming was comparable to the other strategies for high-abundance taxa, it was less effective for rare taxa, thus limiting its utility for comprehensive biodiversity assessment. These differences are largely due to the multiple binding sites for random hexamers compared to the fewer or absent sites with oligo(dT) and taxa-specific primers under high eRNA degradation. Combining random hexamers and oligo(dT) significantly improved taxa recovery, especially for low-abundance species, supporting its best practice in eukaryotes. For prokaryotes or genes lacking polyadenylation, random priming is favoured over taxa- or gene-specific priming. Collectively, these findings underscore the critical importance of selecting appropriate reverse transcription strategies in eRNA metabarcoding, with significant implications for effective biodiversity monitoring and conservation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":" ","pages":"e14092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.14092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both environmental DNA (eDNA) and environmental RNA (eRNA) have been widely adopted for biodiversity assessment. While eDNA often persists longer in environments, eRNA offers a more current view of biological activities. In eRNA metabarcoding, extracted eRNA is reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) for metabarcoding. However, the efficacy of various reverse transcription strategies has not been evaluated. Here we compared the biodiversity recovery efficiency of three strategies: random priming with hexamers, oligo(dT) priming and taxa-specific priming using Mifish-U for fish in both high- and low-biodiversity regions. Our results demonstrate that reverse transcription strategies significantly impact biodiversity recovery. Random priming consistently detected the highest number of taxa in both low- and high-biodiversity regions. In low-biodiversity areas, oligo(dT) performed comparably to random hexamers; however, in high-biodiversity regions, random hexamers outperformed oligo(dT), particularly in recovering rare taxa. While taxa-specific priming was comparable to the other strategies for high-abundance taxa, it was less effective for rare taxa, thus limiting its utility for comprehensive biodiversity assessment. These differences are largely due to the multiple binding sites for random hexamers compared to the fewer or absent sites with oligo(dT) and taxa-specific primers under high eRNA degradation. Combining random hexamers and oligo(dT) significantly improved taxa recovery, especially for low-abundance species, supporting its best practice in eukaryotes. For prokaryotes or genes lacking polyadenylation, random priming is favoured over taxa- or gene-specific priming. Collectively, these findings underscore the critical importance of selecting appropriate reverse transcription strategies in eRNA metabarcoding, with significant implications for effective biodiversity monitoring and conservation efforts.

选择合适的逆转录策略,最大限度地利用eRNA元条形码恢复生物多样性。
环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)和环境RNA (environmental RNA, eRNA)已被广泛用于生物多样性评价。虽然eDNA通常在环境中存在的时间更长,但eRNA提供了一种更现代的生物活动观点。在eRNA元条形码中,提取的eRNA被逆转录成互补DNA (cDNA)进行元条形码编码。然而,各种逆转录策略的疗效尚未得到评估。本研究比较了六聚体随机启动、寡聚体(dT)启动和Mifish-U特异性启动三种策略对高、低生物多样性地区鱼类的生物多样性恢复效率。我们的研究结果表明,逆转录策略显著影响生物多样性的恢复。无论在生物多样性高还是低的区域,随机引物检测到的分类群数量都是最高的。在低生物多样性地区,寡聚体(dT)的表现与随机六聚体相当;然而,在高生物多样性地区,随机六聚体优于寡聚体(dT),特别是在恢复稀有分类群方面。在高丰度分类群中,特异启动与其他策略具有可比性,但在稀有分类群中效果较差,限制了其在生物多样性综合评价中的应用。这些差异很大程度上是由于随机六聚体的多个结合位点,而在eRNA高降解下,低聚物(dT)和分类特异性引物的结合位点较少或缺失。结合随机六聚体和寡聚体(dT)显著提高了分类群的恢复,特别是对低丰度物种,支持其在真核生物中的最佳实践。对于原核生物或缺乏聚腺苷化的基因,随机引物优于分类群或基因特异性引物。总之,这些发现强调了在eRNA元条形码中选择合适的逆转录策略的重要性,对有效的生物多样性监测和保护工作具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信