Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on bone mineral density, bone metabolism markers, and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on bone mineral density, bone metabolism markers, and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yimei Tan, Shuanghua Liu, Qizhi Tang","doi":"10.1007/s00592-025-02468-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically assess randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on fracture incidence, bone mineral density, and bone metabolism markers in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From database setup to March 21, 2024, a search was conducted across nine Chinese and English databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied to assess potential bias. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to explore sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonist was not significantly associated with an increased risk of fracture (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.36; P = 0.41). Additionally, improvement in lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.07 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.09, P < 0.00001), hip neck BMD (MD = 0.05 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08, P = 0.0001) and total hip BMD (MD = 0.06 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.07, P < 0.00001) was superior to the control group. Similarly, GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly improved P1NP (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.59, P = 0.01), OC (MD = 1.46 ug/L, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.83, P < 0.00001), 25-OH-D (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83, P = 0.02), and b-ALP (MD = 0.91ug/L, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.63, P = 0.01) while reducing β-CTX (SMD = - 0.34, 95% CI - 0.54 to - 0.14, P = 0.001). There was no significant impact on other bone metabolism markers, including N-MID-OT (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.86, P = 0.05), ALP (SMD = - 0.00, 95% CI: - 0.25 to 0.25, P = 0.98), Calcium (MD = 0.00 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.04, P = 0.94) and Phosphate (MD = 0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.07, P = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on elevated fracture risk. There was a statistically significant improvement in BMD and certain bone turnover markers (β-CTX, P1NP, OC, b-ALP, and 25-OH-D). However, due to some limitations, further high-quality clinical studies with sufficient follow-up time are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02468-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To systematically assess randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on fracture incidence, bone mineral density, and bone metabolism markers in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: From database setup to March 21, 2024, a search was conducted across nine Chinese and English databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied to assess potential bias. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to explore sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.
Results: Twenty-five studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonist was not significantly associated with an increased risk of fracture (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.36; P = 0.41). Additionally, improvement in lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.07 g/cm2, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.09, P < 0.00001), hip neck BMD (MD = 0.05 g/cm2, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08, P = 0.0001) and total hip BMD (MD = 0.06 g/cm2, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.07, P < 0.00001) was superior to the control group. Similarly, GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly improved P1NP (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.59, P = 0.01), OC (MD = 1.46 ug/L, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.83, P < 0.00001), 25-OH-D (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83, P = 0.02), and b-ALP (MD = 0.91ug/L, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.63, P = 0.01) while reducing β-CTX (SMD = - 0.34, 95% CI - 0.54 to - 0.14, P = 0.001). There was no significant impact on other bone metabolism markers, including N-MID-OT (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.86, P = 0.05), ALP (SMD = - 0.00, 95% CI: - 0.25 to 0.25, P = 0.98), Calcium (MD = 0.00 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.04, P = 0.94) and Phosphate (MD = 0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.07, P = 0.57).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on elevated fracture risk. There was a statistically significant improvement in BMD and certain bone turnover markers (β-CTX, P1NP, OC, b-ALP, and 25-OH-D). However, due to some limitations, further high-quality clinical studies with sufficient follow-up time are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
期刊介绍:
Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.